Eric is Quiet

Everyone's legs:

Actually, maybe there is. The way I see things, the reason why most movies succeed is through the marketing and timing. After all, trailers and TV spots are a major influence on people saying "Oh, I wanna see that" or "Looks lame. I'll just wait for Netflix" Something like Taken 2 and Pitch Perfect 2 managed to succeed because they took the basic premise, but upped the stakes with larger budgets and a bigger scope, and they showed that through the advertising, making it not seem like the exact same movie with one minor difference. They also arrived about three years or so after the first movie, which meant that the movies were still relevant and fresh in the general public's minds. Alice 2's marketing made it look like the first movie, but with Sacha Baron Cohen hamming it up. Not really a whole lot to get excited for, and that's not including how it had a six-year gap, that sweet spot where it isn't fresh in people's minds, nor nostalgic enough for the original viewers. Neighbors 2 was advertised as the same movie, but with sorority girls. Not really something fresh and a must-see, even with a two-year gap. TMNT 2 faced similar issues with Neighbors 2, as it really only had two new mutants to offer and again had marketing that gave it much differentiation from its predecessor. Ya see where I'm going with this?

For Deepwater Horizon, it's got Peter Berg and Mark Wahlberg teaming up again, right after Lone Survivor performed well, and the marketing seems to be pretty effective in interesting Middle America with their whole family vibe and survivor angle. I can see it doing around Lone Survivor numbers, maybe lower.

I agree with you on that, but June will have at least 3 strong performers, which is way better than May's 1.

Save us June from this catastrophe!

Sometimes I wish I had your naivete.

Snow white kinda sorta did save Disney. While the studio was doing well financially, Walt poured almost all of the studio's budget, as well as him mortgaging his own house in order to make the film possible, making it pretty much the Waterworld of the 30s, minus the crushing disappointment. But as said, Cinderella also was another big risk with a giant budget at the time, and could have closed the studio down, since a lot of money was lost during WWII. Sleeping Beauty though was a flop in the box office, which made the studio hesitant on another fairy tale until The Little Mermaid came and put Disney back into the limelight. (I'm a huge Disney nerd, BTW, so ask me any Disney-related questions at any time )

A Monster Calls has been moved up a week, now competing against Madea, Jack Reacher, Ouija, Joneses, and I'm Not Ashamed. Include limited American Pastoral into the fray, and that's 7 movies on one weekend.

TMNT 2: $34.6M Me Before You: $17.7M Popstar: $7M

Star Wars has less appeal to the GA than Assassin's Creed?

Even against Rogue One?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2016/05/30/sneak-peek-exclusive-cars-3-new-character-cruz-ramirez/84981778/?hootPostID=15e4821211580d8c480a7f4ec7f520ef

I definitely enjoyed the movie, but it's definitely a huge departure in quality from the previous ones. While it's admirable that Singer attempts to add in dozens of new characters in addition to the growing relationships between Charles, Erik, and Mystique, but it leaves a lot of things underdeveloped or flat-out uninteresting. The new actors did fine, but they didn't really have much going for them, outside of their short story arcs, and Quicksilver's reveal about Magneto being his father felt tacked on and unneeded. Not to mention, the climax felt overlong and way too small in scale for what is supposedly the X-Men's biggest baddie. That said, Charles, Erik, Quicksilver, and Mystique are likable and interesting as always, and I enjoyed Apocalypse (although I do wonder why he doesn't use his powers to make the X-Men fall into the earth). The Wolverine cameo was fun, if unneeded, and I do like the inner battle between Charles and Apocalypse. I do see plenty of potential here for the next movie to be another strong film in the franchise, so hopefully Apocalypse will lead to greener pastures in the future. 3/5

1. The Witch: 5/5 2. The Nice Guys: 4.5/5 3. Zootopia: 4.5/5 4. Deadpool: 4/5 5. Captain America: Civil War: 4/5 6. The Jungle Book: 3.5/5 7. Hail, Caesar!: 3/5 8. Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice: 3/5 9. X-Men: Apocalypse: 3/5

A $57M opener getting a 3.15 multiplier wasn't a good run?

Alas, poor Summer. I knew it, BOT; a season of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy; it hath borne me on many record giving massive money a thousand times; and now, how abhorred in my imagination it is! My gorge rises at it. Here hung those lips that I have kissed I know not how oft. Where be your success now? Your dollars? Your records? Your flashes of joy that were wont to set the table on a roar?

Actually, I'm 50/50 on whether I'm seeing it or not. Some stuff looks decent, but it kinda feels like something I'll probably rent on a boring weekend. I might watch it in the theater to support Samberg, but reviews will probably be the big deciding factor for me.

Uh...me?

I'm pretty sure the October movie's gonna be Gambit. I believe Gambit's planned to begin filming this fall, and New Mutants is still in development.

President's Day next year's gonna be a bloodbath. And a Marvel movie sandwiched between Black Panther and Flash?

Oh Ethan. You have not lived until you've seen Gone Girl. That movie still gives me goosebumps every time I watch it!

With Alice 2's box office following in the footsteps of other "Really? That's a thing?" followups like Ride Along 2 and The Huntsman: Winter's War, it makes me wonder what sequels next year will suffer the same fate of a dramatic drop from its predecessor? I don't know about you, but Cars 3 and Pirates 5 aren't looking so hot right about now.