Yandereprime101189

Going to extremes? I'm being nice to this new Resident Evil. The director previously directed 47 Meters Down 1-2. The first film cost just over 5 million while the second cost 12 million. They cost less than this new Resident Evil and BOTH of them have far better CGI. The Underworld film series and previous Resident Evil series has similar budgets to this one. Again, better CG, better prosthetics too. Deep Blue Sea 3, a direct to video film from last year that has a budget of probably 2-5 million, has better CG. This film's 40 million. The only people that care and argue about CGI are forum users - which is what we are. The mass audience that makes Black Panther (aside from that one moment and the rhinos, Black Panther's CGI ain't that bad), Venom (red is a notorious color to animate and at least Carnage looks like he belongs in the enviornment) and all those big 100-200 million productions apparently don't care - a lot of people will overlook bad CGI if the rest of the film is good - so you might as well argue your point to a wall. But who knows, Viewer Anon says there's people that have seen it and liked it, so maybe, like Venom and Black Panther, there's more to like in the film that makes up for CG.

No Even the worst CGI in Black Panther is a billion times better than any of the CG monsters in this film's trailer. The same goes with Venom 2. Hell, Jungle Cruise looks to have better CGI than what this film has. At least with Black Panther, people got invested in what was going on that they didn't care about the CGI (it also helps that that fight moment is in a fully CGI background (and transition between them fairly well) compared to Resident Evil's placement of CG in live action plates.. With Resident Evil, the monsters are MEANT to elict fright, and they don't. I mean, look at this goddamn monstrosity. . It looks like it belongs with those cut-out aliens in Men in Black that were used as target practice. This thing is supposed to be a serious fright moment. Syfy and Roger Corman would be like "damn, let's go to the drawing board." League of Extraorinary Gentlemen has better CGI and it's almost TWENTY YEARS OLD. And EVERYONE shit on this moment from that film. This moment looks better than ANYTHING CGI from the Resident Evil reboot. https://youtu.be/l1SZ4ccagFQ?t=24 The previous Resident Evil films have better CG. This same director had better CGI in his 47 Meters Down movies.

But will it last the full 100 if it's not a hit? This is just supposed to be a standard biography or is Nolan twisting it?

I'm typtically easy on CGI, but Goddamn that's some bad CGI on some of the monsters. Overall thing looks like it belongs on Tubi or Crackle.

I guess no one wanted to see a Sopranos prequel after all.

Apparently people liked the first Venom a hell of a lot more than they liked the first Suicide Squad.

Disney buying out Marvel Studios killed Paramount.

They didn't kill the first

Considering I was half right, as a former writer for Deadline box office used to say TOLDJA!!!

It's totally a Rothman movie for this to be 90 minutes. He doesn't like movies over 2 hours apparently. . . at least he was that way during the Fox days.

Going by the release window, doing the rough math that means Shang-chi will either Debut on digital services, Tuesday October 19th or Disney+ Wednesday October 20th or Friday October 22nd.

Using the 45 day window, doing the rough math, Eternals will either Come out on digital services Tuesday December 21st, or come on Disney+ Wednesday December 22nd or Friday December 24th.

It just has to be good and gel with the audience, Frozen (which was still doing strong in my theater up till it's Blu release in March 2014), Frozen 2 and Moana all did great because they hit well with the general audience. Encanto looks like it will too - it also has the multiple female leads hook that Frozen had. Make the Disney Princess crossover Disney. It would literally be the animated equivalent of The Avengers.

Venom's runtime without credits was 92 minutes. If you don't count the Spiderverse preview, with credits it's 107 minutes. The 109 minute time makes more sense. It would still be 90+ minutes without credits (likely 95 minutes), but it's better than just altogether 90 minutes (that means it would be anywhere from 78-82 minutes without credits). Could be worst, this could be Winnie the Pooh all over again. 53 minutes without credits.

Chapek's words with Shang-Chi made it seem like it's gonna show up on the service after the 45 day window is up. But they'll likely release it on digital and 4K BR too. And with how they worded Encanto, yeah, they're definitely gonna go that path. Now the Fox films will be released on digital services first before HBO Max due to the HBO deal.

Disney's currently in experiment mode with Disney+. They're successful enough that they could release the movies for free on the service. But yes, I'd pay the Premier Access fee for Shang-chi, Eternals and Encanto without question.

Note the theatrical window press release doesn't mention anything about Antlers. I'm sensing a Hulu release incoming. Rosaline (and very likely Predator 5) are Hulu releases too.

Mhm, they usually release their monthly content update between the 15th-17th

Godzilla vs Kong was initially 140 minutes on AMC and that was with it being rated PG-13 almost a year in advance before it's actual runtime was revealed. Justice League was 150 minutes briefly on some theater sites before it's 120 minute runtime was revealed. 90 minutes is the standard placeholder time for Fandango. It's not impossible, when you compare it to similar Sony horror-tinge franchises like it's Screen Gem films, Resident Evil and Underworld. . .but it's 50/50

It's not even a bit scary but I'll be damned if that third act isn't nuts.

Pretty sure that's the standard placeholder time and the movie will probably be about the same length as the first.

Plus, if Sony follows the original Venom's release cycle, it'll be out on Blu/digital by December to get that holiday season dough.

Kek, alright.

Is anyone really clamoring for a Soprano prequel?

You SOB, I'm in!