Jump to content

Yandereprime101189

Free Account+
  • Posts

    2,859
  • Joined

Everything posted by Yandereprime101189

  1. I mean, that Idris Elba lion movie could work as a day and date movie. Regarding Firestarter
  2. Considering the source, It's really, REALLY not the most reliable, but I did want to bring it up. https://www.reddit.com/r/MarvelStudiosSpoilers/comments/um64ob/tv_bryce_dallas_howard_in_final_talks_to_direct/
  3. On a few forums and message boards, Bryce Dallas Howard may be tapped to direct.
  4. The funniest thing about the movie is that it nearly copies Dracula Untold beat by beat in some sequences and plot points. It's even funnier when you realize both movies are written by the same people.
  5. Marvel has hundreds of thousands of unique heroes and villains they can make movies with that can be unique and different from other entries in the MCU canon. That's why it survives.
  6. Somewhere I read that El Muerto basically appears in only like two comics. I have a sinking feeling this movie may just.......be brushed under the rug.
  7. I'd like to say, with the Bridemaids situation is that sometimes the score might not actually matter that much. You would think a B-grade movie would still be considered good but apparently to many Cinemascore is like a strict parent
  8. Basically this from what I've read or been told. Though Psycho Goreman is more R-rated Power Rangers/Guyver
  9. I don't necessarily personally believe it. A24 does tend to be more Indie darling than wide reaching audience pleasing films, but that's kinda changed with X which was basically one of the best pure slashers in years.
  10. Well in the battle between multiverse movies, Doctor Strange obviously run financially and has the most eyes on it. Lol, no hate on Everything Everywhere. I heard it's fantastic but it's too much of an art film for the GA.
  11. Wanda makes a better Michael Myers/Slasher in this than Michael Myers was in Halloween Kills. I now really want to see a big-budget superslasher movie. Also, Wanda's clearly not dead. Despite the castle falling on her, there is obvious red flash as it falls prety much implying she teleported.
  12. The CGI looks fine as always, spectacular even and it'll probably be fun and a hit but I didn't really have much of a reaction to it. I did like the final notes hinting at "I see you" at the end though. Theater was dead silent.
  13. The complaint about there being too much Wanda doesn't make any sense when SHE'S THE ACTUAL VILLAIN OF THE MOVIE, so of course her screentime is gonna equal Strange's. Also Agatha Harkness being terrified of her and warning Wanda "what have you done" at the end of Wandavision pretty much foreshadowed how absolutely nightmarishly powerful she is.
  14. I wouldn't have posted that if I didn't. Bumblebee was set in the late 80s with this one taking place several years later in the 90s and following the ending where Bumblebee reuinted with Optimus and the robot designs are supposed to be the same as they were in Bumblebee.
  15. This is being described as the direct sequel to Bumblebee, so technically they are pursuing it.
  16. At the date it's currently at, I don't think Oppenheimer is going to break the bank at the box office. Barbie and The Marvels are now likely going to eat it alive. That said, I need more Goose.
  17. Probably any genetics company can clone dinosaurs now after the disaster of Jurassic World and the auction.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.