Jump to content

Cookson

Free Account+
  • Posts

    1,729
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Cookson

  1. Going with 50-60 Dom and 130-150 in China. Another 100-150 from other OS territories. I think LP/UNI win regardless of how the film looks.

     

    NYCC panel can be watched live via collider in 20 minutes:

     

    https://www.google.com/amp/collider.com/pacific-rim-uprising-nycc-panel-watch-online/amp/

    • Like 1
  2. 9 minutes ago, a2knet said:

    I am sure WB had a whole team dedicated to what went wrong with PR1's marketing. That one opened to 37+ and did 100+, while Godzilla opened to 93+. And PR1 imo was the better creature movie.

    Honestly... Godzilla is Godzilla. But yes, the marketing for PR1 was pretty terrible. Makes you wonder why they greenlit the movie for almost a 200m budget if they weren't going to market it correctly.

     

    The funny thing is, I bet overall PR2 will be more profitable.

    • Like 3
  3. 3 hours ago, Hades said:

    It does not look that much worse than the cgi seen in Thor 3, Spiderman Homecoming, Justice League. The original tried its best to stay away from daylight scenes

    This is what I hoping for at this point. This is obviously a downgrade from the first...like really low. At this point I can only hope the cgi I better than Power Rangers. Need to see the full trailer myself still.

     

    The kaiju look really cool though.

  4. 2 minutes ago, Morieris said:

     

    Understandable, I see that point. I'm not even a huge fan of the first one, and there are plenty of other sequels I would have rather had made by WB before this one that probably would have been cheaper.

     

    A MV movie outside of Godzilla or Kong would have been cool. Are there any other monsters they could have used or would it have to be a new one from scratch? I just (vaguely) know what Universal owns regarding that.

    The MV is actually a WB/LP thing. As far as another monster besides Godzilla or Kong, I'm sure theres something they could do.

    • Like 2
  5. 3 minutes ago, Morieris said:

     

    Truth be told I had zero interest until John signed up so I'm mostly happy with this snippet so far, but even with the legit complaints about the robots, so far, from 2 seconds of footage, it looks pretty cartoonishly entertaining to me.

    To me it's not that the movie can't be entertaining, it's more of what was the point? The first did nothing at the box  office. LP could have gotten this same cast and done a low scale 75-100m MonsterVerse film to expand the universe theyre trying to get going more. That's another topic though.

    • Like 1
  6. 29 minutes ago, Bishop54 said:

    The robots seem to have no sense of mass or scale. At least the first film had clunky type robots, that would be the case with things this size. 

     

    This is my main concern with this film. You know the budget at max is like 100m for this. Worried the robots are going to look cartoony vs "clunky". The clunkyness is what I loved about the first one.

     

     

    • Like 1
  7. 11 hours ago, Stutterng baumer Denbrough said:

    I liked the movie but I didn't love it.  It did a lot of things right but it also changed some things or just ignored too much for me to love it.  I'd give it an 8/10 right now but that might go down tomorrow morning.  I think as a movie, it was good but as a massive fan of the book, they just kept too much out of it.

     

    It was scary and they did hit upon a lot of the disturbing stuff with the adults.

    I completely understand what you're saying, but with it being a movie it's going to have stuff cut out.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.