Brainiac5
-
Posts
2,998 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by Brainiac5
-
-
33 minutes ago, mahnamahna said:
Assuming a $50 million 2nd weekend, I'd say it's on pace for $300 million+ DOM.
$31 million 3rd weekend ($258 million)
$16.5 million 4th weekend ($291 million)
$10 million 5th weekend ($310 million)
$4 million 6th weekend ($319 million)
$2 million 7th weekend ($323 million)
$1 million 8th weekend ($325 million)
If it holds slightly better over its 2nd and 3rd weekends, it could even finish ahead of BvS DOM.
It should be #5 DOM for the year unless DM3 does better than the expected $280-320 million DOM.
I'll say anything over 300dom and we could be in for a very big weekend come 11/17/17?
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, cax16 said:12 minutes ago, WrathOfHan said:
So I guess 12M was the roof after all
So the plus side of 200domestic after its 1st 10days??
-
12 minutes ago, baumer said:
You know, I might have to eat some serious crow. Your numbers don't look that impossible. And if WW were to follow TMNT2, it would increase by 80% on Friday. We could be in for a very special number this weekend.
If it does these numbers then I would say 300dom could be on the horizon.
I always wanted the film to cross the mark but I didn't think it would have the steam to do so.
-
3 minutes ago, ZeeSoh said:
Iron Man 3 had a multi of 2.35 whereas GoTG2 will likely finish with a multi of 2.6 which is actually quite decent. But no lets ignore the numbers, we'll go along with whatever agenda you have. GoTG2 had a OW of 146, will finish with 380+, multi of 2.6. But it was not so well received, sure champ whatever you say.
I would have thought the film would have gotten a 2.8+ but 2.6x is damn good in today's Market.
This is the range I believe will start to be more and more common.
-
6 minutes ago, somebody85 said:
Oh no, not saying he did but the aspects that people have criticized the most from WW (the overuse of slo mo and the 3rd act seem like they were from Snyders vision). The colors worked here because of the setting (as far as WW1 and London) but some also wanted it to be brighter (I didn't notice or have a problem with it).
Hopefully DC movies will be as colorful as that island going forward.So Snyder is responsible for the slo-mo and 3rd act???
this is ludicrous.
This is typical hate train.
As he has never used SLO-mo in any of his Dceu films (yet).
-
4
-
-
39 minutes ago, baumer said:
I have a reaaaaaally hard time seeing WW finishing with a similar multiplier as MOS.
I don't as well but it would surprise me if it does.
-
3 minutes ago, baumer said:
OW can use previous films as an excuse. The multiplier usually comes from WOM... especially for an origin story. Films in universes like Harry Potter and Twilight have an insanely Looney fanbase that rushes out to see them. So they can't really count. But even the original Twilight and the original Potter had good multipliers.
Trust me many will blame those films if WW doesn't make over a2.5x.
-
The only bad thing about this projected 2.8x+ for WW will be if it only gets an 2.4x many will blame the previous films for it.
-
3
-
-
3 minutes ago, Arlborn said:
I've been saying for months that this one would do over 100M OW and over 300M dom. One objective down and one to go!
I believe she can do it.
My original prediction was 101 with a 3x.
So pissed I changed it.
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, filmlover said:
Missed my point but whatever.
Not really I see you are trying to make a point but it really has no weight to it as WW Multiplier will already say it's a better film anyway.
-
6 minutes ago, filmlover said:
Because it would make the negative reception BvS had (making more than half your total from opening weekend can in no way be spun as a positive) even more glaring and how much potential it would've had had it enjoyed a positive (or at least significantly less divisive) one.
Your reason still makes no sense
as Ww only needs another 97mil to surpass BVS Multiplier.
-
8 minutes ago, redfirebird2008 said:
Needs a 3.2 to get there. Difficult, but still very possible.
Possible but very doubtful.
I want the film to hit 300 domestic but o know a 2.9x is a lot to acquire.
-
8 minutes ago, filmlover said:
I want nothing more than for it to beat Batman v Superman's $330M total. Justice be served right there.
What justice?
I get the feeling that there's no reason behind you wanting WW to gross more than BVS or SS as it has no chance ,it will not get much more than a 2.7x(2.8xmax)
-
13 minutes ago, iJackSparrow said:
I think they will do ANYTHING to make sure that JL is a home run. And rightfully so. Delaying from November wouldn't be novel (it happened with both MoS, BvS and even WW and Aquaman to a certain extent) and it's not something no one should oppose given the circumstances. If they have to, I'm sure they will.
Why would they want the film to be delayed just because of a few additional add-ons??
The film is nearly complete and only needed a few extra scenes.
-
4
-
-
2 minutes ago, ArmGunar said:
1-2mil shy of 80%of SS opening so it's safe
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, keysersoze123 said:
Smaller than norm has always led to strong legs. There has never been a exception
Stop speaking common-Sense
-
14 minutes ago, brian.jensen.507464 said:
This article from Variety pointed out the issue that I'm talking about. This was written back in April, that was addressing the issue of Wonder Woman being buried in the marketing and not being heavily promoted. And this was basically written over two months ago. There was more marketing being done for Justice League, which isn't even out until November. And it points out how much promotion that BVS and Suicide Squad was getting a few months each films release.
It was obvious that WB was using a different approach with Wonder Woman.
Here's the link. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/warner-bros-mulls-releasing-films-881265
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkThis is a false in every way and they should be ashamed of themselves for making none existing point.
-
54 minutes ago, brian.jensen.507464 said:
It's pretty clear that WB spend more money marketing and promoting MOS, BVS, and Suicide Squad than what they spent on "Wonder Woman." But once "Wonder Woman" got rave reviews, they decided to go out for the marketing and promotion for "Wonder Woman", especially during the last two weeks of May, and right up to the release of the film in the first weekend of June.
That's what I was pointing out, but apparently you didn't read it.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkDude it's a known fact that the film Budget is significant lower than previous films in the universe.
why would WW have the same Marketing Budget as BVS or Man of steel when both films are maybe 100mil more in production.
You can't say the Marketing was amped up because of reviews as Marketing is one of the best things The company has always done with all of the films they have released connected to a DC property.
By the way if it is so what is wrong with the using it to their advantage???
Not a mother----ing thing
-
1
-
-
29 minutes ago, brian.jensen.507464 said:
Which isn't that great for Superhero films.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkIt is when your opening is 100+
-
1
-
-
21 minutes ago, baumer said:
And 2.5 isn't that great of a multiplier.
When your averaging 120mil for an opening weekend a 2.5x is actually good.
If WW can pull the 2.7-2.8 many are hoping for then the Dceu average will be 2.4-2.5x.
thats pretty good when none of your films has opened under 100mil.
this is a feat that is vastly overlooked.
-
Just now, baumer said:
Then take the Walmart previews out of the total. You can't have it both ways.
And you will still get a multiplier of 2.5x and 279 dom.
-
3
-
-
2 minutes ago, Hatebox said:
Well Civil War sucks for similar issues — motivations are all over the goddamn shop — so I agree with you!
I don't think CW had a incoherent story I just believe the films execution was weak.
-
2 minutes ago, Ethan Hunt said:
yeah sure BvS and MoS have problems but I don't think any of them have anything to do with being incoherent. Certainly can't see how they are less coherent than say Civil War or any number of other MCU movies
It's all about what supports your narrative.
i had no problem following the Original cut of BVS but many feel it wasn't coherent.
I saw 3 Story lines end up in one place.
Growing up I always thought that what a coherent story was but I guess the rules has changed.
-
4 minutes ago, mredman said:
The first Batman movie in Nolans trilogy "Batman Begins" made even less. MoS was the starter of the DCEU. Its so obvious a Superman sequel will make more than MoS. Now that they know this Supes and Cavill in the role.
Of course the should and they are doing one with the Vaughn news.
I know that they are I'm just more concerned with the films reception as Ot would seems most Superman Fans doesn't know what they want from the character.
MOS was everything I wanted from the character Superman Returns was not ,yet I'm told I like the wrong movie.
Iron Man 3 had a multi of 2.35 whereas GoTG2 will likely finish with a multi of 2.6 which is actually quite decent. But no lets ignore the numbers, we'll go along with whatever agenda you have.
Wonder Woman 11.7M Monday ERC pg 3
in Numbers and Data
Posted
She has always been Front and Center.
Notice she was in the Middle in the big fight in BVS and in its Marketing as well.
Also there's that shot With her and Aquaman and Cyborg,There's no doubt in my mind that will be a Key scene to focus on the Three.
Not too mention If the Story is Her and Bruce Starting The JL then that Makes Her the Main Co-Star.
If WB does push her More I see no problem in it as She is part of The universe and A new Dawn of the Face of The JL could be Upon us.
1st Batman was The key now they don't have to be so dependent on him.
Isnt This what Everyone wanted anyway?