Jessie Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 I watched this for the first time yesterday and it's a very well made film yet it wasn't even nominated. Surely that's not right, after all, a documentary about an idiot who decides to eat a McDonalds for every meal in a month got a nod, but this didn't lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoolioD1 Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 IIRC it was ineligible. I forget why. It's one of those categories that has weird rules. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Nevada Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 I really like the film, but it isnt a documentary; its propaganda. Propaganda I agree with, but still Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Alfred Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 It wasn't a great film, it was ok. The studio and Moore's arrogance cost them a nom. They decided to go for Best Picture and it made it ineligible for the documentary category. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webslinger Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 Michael Moore personally opted not to submit Fahrenheit 9/11 for Best Documentary, so no, it was not snubbed.I didn't really care for the film. I wasn't a fan of Bush, but Moore didn't bring much to the table that wasn't already fairly common knowledge at the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTF Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 (edited) I really like the film, but it isnt a documentary; its propaganda...This...and it wasn't eligible/wasn't submitted for consideration. Edited September 3, 2012 by FTF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
