-
Posts
5,143 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
"Lots of places..."
Recent Profile Visitors
4,097 profile views
Macleod's Achievements
Blockbuster (7/10)
3.2k
Reputation
-
On the other hand, this is no different than numerous filmmakers on high-profile genre projects over the last decade denying, denying, denying up front until the truth ultimately comes out. What I *could* see being the case is that this *is* a leaked photo, but of a prep for a flashback scene within the movie where "Superman" is first seen/revealed in public, with Kal-el's early costume. He updates his outfit some years later...with hopefully a longer cape! 😉 But I dig the logo choice. And the snow...which presumably (but not necessarily) signals some Fortress of Solitude action. And no, we haven't had any casting for any Martha/Jonathan Kent, yet, right? With Gunn being so traditional in re-establishing the rest (including Luthor's bald 'do'), it would be surprising to not see them much (or at all), here...but perhaps that's an angle he's taking?
-
Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire | March 22, 2024
Macleod replied to Eric Atreides's topic in Box Office Discussion
This clearly should have been the first movie out. At least going on trailers...but that's what they want you to think... Still haven't seen Afterlife (or that "other one"), forgive me. But I'd be more interested in seeing this. Let's see if this works the same way for the general audience. -
The Disney Thread | Iger will be with us until 2026
Macleod replied to A Marvel Fanboy's topic in Box Office Discussion
Netflix is a streamer by origin -- any titles we got from them on physical media were a bonus. Best Buy was a retail distributor; they had no hand in the organization or decision-making for any studio, other than getting some exclusive Steelbooks. Disney is now outsourcing to SONY, which yes, actually might help *increase* titles on the public market since they presumably will take away all of the physical labor work they had to preside over. Now it's really about executive sign-offs on certain titles and extras (which, give recent history, did come under some scrutiny within the studio organization, yes.) But I see hopeful things for this, as a still-semi-devoted collector of (and strong advocate for) physical media. If Disney/Sony sales go well, it will only encourage everyone else a little more to dig into catalogues. -
They say it right there: They will now "either minimize the character or excise him entirely." And the claim is that they were already making moves to minimize the character after Quantumania underperformed (but seriously, folks, I don't know why they expected that movie to "explode"). My guess is that they will drop Kang, period, and the focus will shift to building an antagonist like The Beyonder as well as possibly...Doom.
-
Haven't caught up with the last season, yet, but from the first two seasons, it is a good show, and yes, a damn sight better than any recent seasons I'd seen of the other CW DC superhero shows. But they were already cutting costs, and as I said in another thread here, Warner Bros. surely A) didn't want to be embarrassed again like during the SMALLVILLE/Superman Returns competition that happened, and B ) Yes, surely Zaslav and/or Gunn were involved in making the decision here, as others have said, Zaslav has been very clear about his feelings on this matter in interviews already! I also think it's amazing that it's even getting a 4th season!
-
Oh, they realized how good the show is? 😁 No, seriously folks, the show was already being shaved down in terms of budget and the unsure future of THE CW. Plus... Warners learned from their SMALLVILLE experience! 😁 They're not afraid of "competition" per se...but in the off-chance that Gunn's film underwhelms, they don't want the same kind of situation, again -- SMALLVILLE lasted 10 years on-air and is *still* loved and talked about to this day, while SUPERMAN RETURNS lasted...maybe 2 or 3 in mass cultural consciousness.