I mean, any kind of disagreement is saying that the other side is “‘wrong’ in so many words,” right? Even just positively asserting one’s own view implies that other conclusions are wrong!
M37 has also used some language recently along the lines of “what I was expecting was smart/reasonable/correct base case, what other people were expecting was wrong.” I disagree on the merits, but beyond that I don’t really object to the framing — I’d certainly hope that people believe their own analysis is right, and it’s not like you can simultaneously believe that heading for 23 is right and heading for 20 is right and heading for 18 is right.