BadOlCatSylvester
-
Posts
2,572 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by BadOlCatSylvester
-
-
I will say, them announcing this cast now and not at Comic-Con is a likely indication they'll be sitting this year out too. Because let's face it, this is the only trump card they had for that, and they chose to play it now. If they still go this year, then all they'll have to show are Disney+ fodder.
-
4 minutes ago, crazymoviekid said:
Why is everyone so anti-Thunderbolts? Yes, it's a little bit on banking on the D+ shows, but it's also a Black Widow follow up. I want more Florence and David!!
That actually is a detriment to this movie, as Black Widow was not exactly a crowdpleaser. There's obviously the matter of Thunderbolts not being a known property and Marvel no longer having the goodwill to prop such properties up. They're actually taking a big risk here by still going full steam ahead with this movie, even going as far as moving the release up. There's something to be said for that.
-
1 minute ago, Brainbug said:
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH
IT LOOKS FUCKING AMAZIIIIIIIING
DAY ZERO
-
2
-
-
-
Never forget what they took from us:
NEVER FORGET.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, WorkingonaName said:
Putting this near Supes and JW doesn't seem like a wise idea.
Jurassic isn't making that date, and we all know it. Also, while Fantastic Four isn't an S-tier property, it definitely stands a hell of a lot more of a chance against Superman's third weekend than Thunderbolts ever could.
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, fabiopazzo2 said:
Maybe I'm a bad person but I was hoping they would delete this movie
I feel like they're too far along now to pull the plug, and/or are proud of what they have now after the creative overhaul last year. We'll just have to wait and see at this point.
-
Pedro sounds odd as Reed on paper, but he has the talent to make it work. I have no issues with the rest. Changing places with Thunderbolts is also a good idea, as that one would've been destroyed by Superman.
-
2
-
-
4 minutes ago, CJohn said:
Baby Peter is born in 2003 in this movie. Take from that what you want.
How big of a role do the Parkers have here? The original rumours were claiming they were key factors to the storyline, but that doesn't seem to be the case anymore from what I've read.
-
9 minutes ago, JustWatching said:
Two things. One, at least domestically they are marketing the hell out of this film. Just heard my second freakin radio spot for it this morning driving into work (on Q101 here in Chicago if anyone cares). Basically if you don’t know there’s a Bob Marley movie coming out today, you’re in a coma or dead.Second, there’s just nothing else out. Your V-day date night choices are One Love or Madame Web, and the latter is at 16% on RT.
One Love isn't exactly getting raves either. I feel like in that situation couples would be more likely to do something else, or just do a movie night at home with something good. There's no shortage of entertainment today.
-
51 minutes ago, grim22 said:
WTF does this mean
He hasn't changed one bit from the last Transformers press circuit. He was responsible for a lot of incomprehensible statements back then, muddying the waters regarding its continuity. Rise of the Beasts would have been so much better without his meddling. Hopefully he gets blocked in some way if we get another live action movie.
-
21 minutes ago, DInky said:
This is S.J. Clarkson's first movie but she's a a real TV veteran (and she's directed shows like the British Life on Mars which looked fantastic) so how is this movie so bad on a technical level?
You said it yourself. She is a television veteran, but this is the first feature film she ever directed. The sad part is, she tried to get in before by joining Star Trek 4 back in 2018, but that got shelved after pay disputes with the stars. I'll always wonder if this movie would've been better had Clarkson actually gotten to make Star Trek 4, and therefore score some serious experience in film.
-
2 minutes ago, JustLurking said:
this is what they chose to release?? like...willingly?
Judging by all the review scores it's scarily possible that this is how the final movie is going to be like.
-
9 minutes ago, Valonqar said:
Sony wanted its The Marvels. It got it.
I mean, as infamous of a flop as it is now, greenlighting that one made sense at the time. Captain Marvel was a billion dollar hit, and Marvel was still on top of the world and hadn't hit the slump they're currently in, so why not make another? Madame Web should never have gotten her own movie, and it would've flopped in any era as long as it was the Sony suits in charge.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Grand Cine said:
Should we laugh or cry , at this point ?
Well, I'm getting plenty of laughs from these reviews, so I'll take the former.
-
Also, this fan-driven superhero piece is starting off at 23%. And scores for these usually go down as more reviews are published. I'll leave you all to be the judge of that.
-
Just now, ScareLol said:
0% Top Critics (3.10 avg)
WHAT THE FUCK?! Someone needs to screenshot that!
-
Wait, are reviews live now?
-
22 minutes ago, John Marston said:
One of the reviews says that the Amazon researching spiders line isn’t in the Final Cut.
boycott
What the FUCK do you mean it isn't in the final movie?! No wonder why the reactions have been so bad. #ReleaseTheClarksonCut NOW!!!!!!
-
37 minutes ago, Goldenhour36 said:
What is going on with Sony? With all the investment they have, they can't get audience and critics satisfy with a Live Action Marvel Movie. Also the fact that Sony pointed out this was post to be one of their big 6 live action (Ghostbusters, Kraven, Karate Kid, Venom, Bad Boys) films of the year shows this is going to be a rough 100 anniversary.
A big problem they'll face in the years to come is that this whole franchise was built on smoke and mirrors. They prominently use the Marvel logo in all the promotional material to deceive people into thinking they're in league with the MCU as well. The thing is, that tactic relied single-handedly on the overall strength of the Marvel brand, and that brand value has nosedived starting with Multiverse of Madness. So now instead of a golden goose they're hitching themselves a ride to damaged goods, which will turn off a lot of people. What makes this even worse is that these movies are all spinoffs of Spider-Man, a character who is still big and can be without needing any help from the larger Marvel universe. Unless they pull another stunt like in 2019 and take Spidey back, I wouldn't be surprised if Venom 3 is the last of these.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Blaze Heatnix said:
I'm curious if the audience score is getting double digits for this one! lol
Anyway
I was about to post that! Not even Marvel's biggest champion liked it, and he hated it even more than Morbius! What the fuck is this movie?!
-
Holy shit, these are the most brutal reactions I've ever seen for a capefilm in years. Is this even getting to the double digits on Rotten Tomatoes?!
-
9
-
-
24 minutes ago, Speedorito said:
I don’t know why people still give him attention. Not only is he a hack who’s consistently off the mark, but he’s arrogant and either throws a tantrum or goes radio silent when whatever nonsense he says turns out to be wrong yet again.
This all makes me wonder how accurate his claims about Ballerina are, and if the movie is truly as bad as he claims.
-
1
-
-
Yeah, I don't think the TVA's relevance to this story is going to hurt it to the same level the Disney+ connections hurt The Marvels. Loki, at least its first season, was very popular and a big hit. The TVA can also be easily explained as a shady timeline protector without any Loki context needed. All people need to know is that this is a result of Wade tampering with time to save his loved ones. It's not like any of the Loki characters are going to be in this anyway.
-
3
-
Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire | March 29, 2024 | They're boyfriends now
in Box Office Discussion
Posted
I'd spoiler-tag this if I were you, as it features a character they haven't actually announced yet.