Jump to content

SoSaysI

Free Account+
  • Posts

    459
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SoSaysI

  1. 10 minutes ago, Nova said:

    There are plenty of reasons to think that its previews to opening weekend will be comparable to other DCEU films. For one it's a DC film. Two it's aimed at females and female films tend to be more frontloaded. Three it's also a comic book film and those tend to be more frontloaded. 

     

    Having said all of that....there are some who believe that its presales will kick in, in the coming week and that it'll get really good WOM which would help its OW multiplier and legs down the stretch. 

     

    But like I don't understand this notion of acting like WW isn't going to be  frontloaded...and this is someone who thinks it will be backloaded...but it's not because I have actual evidence/reasons of it. Just that it's a hunch I have. But like I don't expect $12M in previews to become a $140M OW anymore than I expect a $17M OW to become a $200M+ OW for WW. And $31M in previews? There's zero evidence to show it's doing that. Absolutely none. 

     

    I would actually say the evidence shows that there is no way WW is doing anywhere near $31 million in previews.

    • Like 1
  2. 9 minutes ago, GiantCALBears said:

    No more likes but @DeeCee nailed it so far. Nice going man!

    Yeah, I'd be very interested to see how Rogue One is holding on day 2 in Australia.  That is probably actually the best indicator we have for how the rest of this weekend will go in the US.  Obviously a great number doesn't mean Rogue One will do great the rest of the weekend here or vice versa but that is probably the best predictor we can have for the rest of this weekend.

    • Like 1
  3. 4 minutes ago, Cmasterclay said:

    With a weekend IM from the preview of 4.5, only slightly less than TFA, this does 130.5 OW. That means baumer's club would be looking real good, FWIW. And honestly, I think its multiplier from preview might be even worse. I'd love for someone to explain to me how an adult-oriented spinoff for the fans will be more backloaded than the broadly appealing TFA. I just don't get it. 

    This same thing could have been said for Fantastic Beasts like a month ago. 

    • Like 3
  4. Just now, Bishop54 said:

    Gareth Edwards is off to a roaring start in regards to blockbusters lol.


    Godzilla was a pretty big hit and this will be a big hit.  So despite your sarcasm, yes, he is off to a good start in regards to blockbusters.  Russia wasn't big for TFA either.

  5. 22 minutes ago, MrFanaticGuy34 said:

     

    Yeah, but you make some stupid-ass clubs that are more targeted against anything Disney-related.

     

    Remember your "Finding Dory under $210M-club"? Fail. 

     

    Your "Doctor Strange under $150M"-club? Fail.

     

    And now, your "Fantastic Beasts to crush Moana by $200M"-club? Well, guess what? FAIL!

     

    And about you cheerfully admitting you loss?....Honestly, I don't think you're gonna learn something from failing 3 times this year. Cause you're gonna keep doing the same shit with other overly-lowballing clubs for upcoming Disney films.

     

    Like, what's next? Beauty and the Beast under $100M? Guardians of the Galaxy 2 under $200M? Pfft! Give me a break!

     

    I admit.....following the box office is fun. But you creating clubs like those 3.....that's just dumb.

     

    Don't forget that he also created quite possibly the dumbest club ever to be created on this board with his Fox to beat Disney in 2016 club when Fox is going to lose to Disney this year by well over $1 billion and Disney was already guaranteed to beat Fox by the time he started that club. 

    • Like 2
  6. 1 minute ago, Lestranger said:

    ID4R failure is a marketing failure. This was a great time to release a sequel. Nostalgia for the original will never be higher. They just dropped the ball with the marketing. It looks flaccid, every single frame of it. It looked like a boring version of Transformers. The quality of the film is nearly irrelevant for OW on a movie like this. This should have opened in low 100s with no problem at all. Fox face planted.

     

    Agreed.  While the critic reviews for this haven't been good so far, they aren't bad enough where they would have made people decide not to see the film if there was legitimate excitement and buzz for this.  Every piece of marketing made this movie look as boring and wooden as possible. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.