My assumption at the time was the idea that you were denying the "all corporations are greedy" line I mentioned. My apologies for the confusion.
But just to go back here, I am also well aware that WB and Uni are not doing this out of the kindness of their hearts. I am also aware that AMC, Cinemark, Cineworld, and other major exhibitors also made these deals not out of the kindness of their hearts or preservation of the theatrical experience, but rather to appease shareholders.
However, the big issue here is the idea you are saying here that theaters should just put up with awful deals and demands from a major company with more money than God. The idea that Disney, one of the biggest media companies in history with hundreds, if not thousands of revenue sources, not only has to make deals for one revenue source that strongly favors them, but you encourage and believe the opposing team should just go with it? Even if they still get anguish from it at the end?
That right there is my major problem. The idea that a greedy company that is clearly not starved for money is justified in bullying exhibitors, which despite being in it for the money, is struggling to get by and is the only reason said greedy company is popular in the first place, just because they make popular movies people like...that does not bother you? You really don't think they should compromise, throw a bone, or be a touch nicer? You don't think this is a major problem with our broken and toxic capitalist system? You really don't think this is an issue, even a little bit?