ThePhasmid

To mistake careful attention to visual fidelity as pretentious art is pretty much the thesis for Hollywood short funding time vs. budget. Congrats, you're an idiot.

The original had the same complaints of it being too deliberately paced and languid. That's why the studio forced Harrison to do a voice over, which was staunchly defended by some fans (Guillermo Del Toro oddly joining the ranks of the few). It's hilarious in its perfunctory "beat by beat" explanation of things that are so obvious on the surface. Blade Runner 2049 is equally as visually stunning and beguiling to those who are not commonly drawn to aesthetic mastery. Furthermore, the sequel to the grandfather of futuristic anime stylized motion and atmosphere made the Ghost in the Shell translation look like cheap imitation.

De Palma's style in the original cannot be underestimated. Aesthetically speaking, it's hard to top the original. The Langley heist is one of the most breathtaking action sequences of the 90s. Rogue Nation is a close second, and Ghost Protocol a close third. III and II are entertaining despite being the lesser entries.

Yes, but does Renner want to take the mantle? Does he? I'd accept with open arms.

I like the cut of your jib, sir. Until you mentioned Lautner and Stewart. Paramount et al. has better sense than to cast those milquetoast actors lacking the magnetic charisma of Cruise. Unlike the snooty Brits, I don't think we're opposed to casting an international star in the lead role of the hot shot IMF agent. We'll branch beyond our oceanic borders to find the best talent possible for this massive action franchise. Shady accent and all.

Since this series is clearly shaping up to be the American version of Bond, who would be an acceptable replacement of Cruise for Hunt? Cruise is inevitably going to have to take a backseat to the role, and solely stick to producing duties with this beloved action franchise. Who can seriously replace Cruise's magnetism? It's gonna be tough, but I don't see how Cruise/studios avoid it.

Rogue Nation turned out amazing despite its OG release date being pushed up to a nightmarish degree. 5 months cut off of post production. It's incredible how the opera sequence turned out to be one of the best espionage sequences of the new millennium on such a pressured schedule. McQuarrie now has plenty of flexibility with the schedule. This sequel is gonna be something special. My most anticipated action blockbuster of the summer right now.

I knew this was going to make it, but it still hurts.

Breakout suggests a film that people knew would do well, but not as well as it inevitably turned out to be. This isn't necessarily based upon the total number it brought in, but rather how much better it performed than what everyone thought it would. I'm gonna go ahead and toss the die on "Ready Player One". Black Panther has the marketing and franchise connection. That's a gimme. RP1 has a chance to surprise, and mark Spielberg's official return to blockbuster cinema.

Get Out was a relative surprise, but I chose "It". It wrecked all records despite everyone being somewhat tempered with its chances. We all knew it was going to do well, but HOLY SHIT!

I will cringe a bit when I see Blade Runner 2049 show up. It's one of the best sci-fi sequels ever made, and the best film I've seen all year. Damn shame it didn't do so well at the BO.

Despite my reservations from the absence of a modern great auteur, Denis, this looks very effin' entertaining. It might end up making more than the original despite whatever critical reaction comes its way. That is a fantastic action driven trailer tailor made for general audiences.

Fireplace cracking. Stockings hung. Die Hard trilogy and Forrest Gump marathons/re-runs on the TV. Another Star Wars film slaying at the BO. Merry Christmas, y'all.

I don't know how to answer this question. However, objectively speaking, Avatar deserves a sequel. If by pure, you mean the almighty dollar is the singular force of continuing an artistic vision in Hollywood, I would say that is a definitive yes.

All of these franchises have had terrible films attached to their name. X-3, X-Men Origins, the first two Thor films, Iron Man 2, Batman Forever, Batman & Robin, Catwoman, Superman Returns, Green Lantern, the first few Harry Potter films, almost all of the SW prequels, etc. I don't care what studio released it, but the worst of the worst being Fant4stic.

I hope this breaks the Goldblum sequelitis (Thor doesn't count as he's a new player). Honestly, I don't see it in the trailer. At this point, I'd rather watch a "proper" sequel to Cronenberg's rendition of The Fly as directed by Mr. Del Toro. Brundle didn't fully perish during the transport. His spirit lived on as consciousness embraced by the insect world. Think about it...it makes more sense than people returning to this shitty island. It'd be like an R rated version of Antz.