MightyDargon
-
Posts
941 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Everything posted by MightyDargon
-
Please stop making movie titles consisting of "(thing) Guy(s)". It always leads to a poor opening.
-
SHIT, Hayley Mills is still alive!?!???!
-
The Garfield Movie | Sony | May 24, 2024
MightyDargon replied to AMCTheater2000's topic in Box Office Discussion
....I could see it doing over 40 mil. Not over 50 unless it dramatically spikes. -
Considering I haven't heard any reports of If becoming a meme movie in any way, I'll take "no" over "flying pandas fart out peppermint bubbles and If becomes the next Gentleminions" for my theory on this one.
-
If isn't getting "Gentleminions". That ONLY happened because Minions was already popular.
-
What I'm saying is no one will pay for "WB" as a whole. Loads of unprofitable cable channels and other crap still.
-
I doubt people will want to buy all of WB and absorb its even more massive debt load either.
-
She can "go it alone" for now but all that will do will increase the likelihood that Paramount will end up getting sold for parts later. Most buyers aren't interested in dozens of unprofitable cable channels.
-
I'm increasingly skeptical on tracking given how much Fall Guy underperformed "studio tracking". It didn't underperform the actual tracking ON HERE but unless I see a big groundswell for IF I think Garfield will be the main "pure kids" movie.
-
I actually don't think the family market is as starved as people claim. Ghostbusters and Kung Fu Panda already came out. You'd think NOTHING targeted families since Wonka the way people on here talk.
-
Its real world performance tracks more to Metacritic than the "It coulda been Maverick" so I'll take my word that people use Metacritic over yours.
-
I seriously don't even remember the first Fall Guy trailer. This movie's marketing was a total botch compared to something like Civil War. Yeah a stuntman movie isn't "zeitgeisty" but they had no idea what they were selling compared to how comparable action films are usually marketed.
-
...okay, but I seriously don't remember that. It felt very muted even compared to the Civil War "THIS COULD HAPPEN TOMORROW" stuff.
-
That's one way of looking at it. The other way is that people did not seem very "buzzed" about seeing Fall Guy before or after reviews dropped, which would have been evident in a spike in advance sales. After all the hype it got ON HERE (but not really on other sites) it'll likely do a bit better than Civil War for its week 1 and cost the studio a lot more. If there had been a single scene or aspect to the movie that was "hyped" (even if it were controversial) I would have changed my tune.
-
General audiences use Metacritic all the time. It gets noted all the time for video games, it's not an obscure website. More importantly, it tracks how the critics actually feel about the movie other than good/bad. Fall Guy did not have the kind of "divisive" response Joker did that actually propelled the movie, nor did it have the near-universal praise of something like Oppenheimer or Minus One. It was "this is a good action movie" not "this is an absolute world beater and savior of movies".
-
Again, nobody is actually going to remember the "high" scores if the actual buzz is "good, not great" for a movie they weren't terribly interested in in the first place. Fall Guy's Metacritic is a more realistic 73/100.
-
There's a difference between "good but not great" Fresh reviews and "SEE NOW" Fresh reviews.
-
Geez, your act sucks. You're like the Vanilla Ice of doomposters.
-
Starting to think CJohn needs a ban, or at least a warning. My trolling is like Groucho Marx in comparison.
-
They shouldn't have done the whole Barbenheimer. They should have done Fall Guy Meets Guy from HARLEM instead.
-
Could they have possibly went with a title that doesn't sound like "Free Guy" to the vast majority of people who DON'T remember the Lee Majors series?
-
Let's put it this way.... the amount of people watching/not watching Fall Guy based on a single line about the miserable Depp/Heard relationship is absolutely miniscule.
-
The Sequel Trilogy aren't getting re-evaluated because they didn't introduce any new characters that people cared about and felt like inferior versions of the originals.
-
I'm sure you're correct on that. Problem is sticking Blunt/Gosling in the same film does not=Barbenheimer in hype terms.
-
Velma got an s2 because Zaslav only cares about animation for hatewatching/cheap pops on streaming. Velma s2 is already down to #10 on Max US, I very much doubt it gets an s3. It's not exactly Bojack in durability terms.
