Olive Posted August 26, 2013 Share Posted August 26, 2013 No one said it flopped, we are just happy it's decreasing from the first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted August 26, 2013 Author Share Posted August 26, 2013 So hate that is. Objective is what needed, not hate or love. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olive Posted August 26, 2013 Share Posted August 26, 2013 Why are you keep defending shit movies like this and After Earth? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted August 26, 2013 Author Share Posted August 26, 2013 Justice Like all man are equal before laws, all movie are equal before box office. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olive Posted August 26, 2013 Share Posted August 26, 2013 Nope. Shitty movies deserve to die. The Smurfs 2 is one of them. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCS Posted August 26, 2013 Share Posted August 26, 2013 Why compare Smurfs 2 and Star Trek 2? Smurfs 2 is failing on its own terms like it deserves to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted August 26, 2013 Author Share Posted August 26, 2013 Why compare Smurfs 2 and Star Trek 2? Smurfs 2 is failing on its own terms like it deserves to. Smurfs 2 fails ? Okay, then Flopness failed on its own terms where it shouldnt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCS Posted August 26, 2013 Share Posted August 26, 2013 Smurfs 2 fails ? It's gross DOM and especially OS gross are very poor and disappointing as a sequel following the wildly successful Smurfs, yes. No need to mention Star Trek, just talking about Smurfs 2 as a sequel. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tupek Posted August 26, 2013 Share Posted August 26, 2013 People over estimated the potential of Star Trek. Not a few thought it would make $400 m. domestically. Thats on one hand. On the other hand, at least it surpassed the WW gross of its predecessor. As for The Smurfs 2. It will gross almost $200 less than the first movie WW. Though less people had increasing expectatives about that. The Smurfs 2 is more disappointing in my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted August 26, 2013 Author Share Posted August 26, 2013 STID gross DOM and especially OS gross are very poor and disappointing as a sequel following the wildly successful 09 Trek, yes. fixed for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCS Posted August 26, 2013 Share Posted August 26, 2013 Star Trek was not, and still is not, a big franchise OS but Smurfs was so this is the Smurfs thread so we talk about it's poor OS gross. I don't really care about Star Trek if it does good or bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tupek Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 It was not a big franchise overseas, still almost all people had predictions over $500 million for Trek 2. And still, at first glance, it was not a hard feat: the 2009 reboot made $386m WW. $500m WW looked easy to get. And its not getting there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 (edited) STiD increased 16% WW over his previous movie. Smurfs will decrease around 35% WW over his previous movie. So fuck your ridiculous logic firedeep and stop trolling. Smurfs 2 won't even make 70M DOM. Fucking pathetic. Edited August 27, 2013 by CJohn 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tower Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 (edited) This is the Smurfs thread. Also, Star trek went up WW, Smurfs went down. Star Trek didn't do very well but Smurfs is just terrible. Edited August 27, 2013 by Tower 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Yeah I'm not sure why fire deep keeps bringing up Trek. Talk about Treks disappointing performance in the Trek thread 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted August 27, 2013 Author Share Posted August 27, 2013 Who cares about what the previous movies did. Truth is Smurfs 2 is more profitable than Flopness, and that's all matters. thus makes Flopness a bigger disappointment than Smurfs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
POLYLOVE Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Star trek is so innocent to be your benchmark. Anyway, shitty movies deserve to die, for the good of movie industry. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Who cares about what the previous movies did. Truth is Smurfs 2 is more profitable than Flopness, and that's all matters. thus makes Flopness a bigger disappointment than Smurfs. You are just being ridiculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted August 27, 2013 Author Share Posted August 27, 2013 Not really. Smurfs 2 is obviously more profitable because it has half budget of STiD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilusha Bandara Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 (edited) Sony would have thought 400 OS would be a lock for this shit! Poor Sony. Their worst nightmare came true, this summer! Edited August 27, 2013 by The Joker 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
