Jump to content

LonePirate

Red Account
  • Posts

    1,885
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LonePirate

  1. For a film marketed at the art house crowd with such a middling reception from critics, V&A is performing better than almost anyone could have expected. After IT, V&A might have the most surprising run of any film released in September. It seems likely to outgross the far more high profile Battle of the Sexes, which would be quite a feat. I doubt anyone here has seen the film but if so, what did you think of it? What sort of crowd is it attracting?
  2. Wright and Hoeks were the acting standouts in the film. Ford had little to do and Davis brought nothing, even though she was part of the most interesting scene in the movie.
  3. Yes, the film most certainly was marketed as an action film. The scenes and accompanying music in this trailer give the appearance the film is an action film when in reality it is much more similar to Arrival than to Aliens.
  4. Most casual and young moviegoers could watch the BR2049 trailer and not have a clue what this movie was about. Perhaps even worse, the trailer (at least the main one I just rewatched on IMDB), hints that you need to have seen the first film in order to understand this one. Nobody likes homework assignments. Not only that but the trailer gives an entirely different impression of the film's pacing. In short, it's a well-crafted film that few want to see. It would have been better served by turning it into a television series, dumping Ford's character entirely and replacing Gosling with a TV star.
  5. After seeing BR2049, I'm thinking the Cinemascore will be a B or a B+. It plays more like a sci fi art film than a sci fi action film which I suspect is what many people are expecting when they walk in to see it. It's well made and another solid effort from Villeneuve, although it needs to be edited to remove some bloat.
  6. I just returned from BR2 and I, too, though the score was excellent. The cinematography was superb as well. The directing was solid. The acting was serviceable but unremarkable. Wright and Hoeks were the best of the bunch. The writing was fine, at least what there was of it. The effects were interesting, especially during that one scene involving three characters about the 2/3 point in the movie. However, the film is in desperate need of some editing. A good 45-60 minutes could have been cut, especially the numerous, long, silent tracking shots. Not only that but Leto's character would not have been missed even if all of his scenes had been left on the cutting room floor. Overall, I found it to be a good film, though not a great film. It is certainly skewing very old, although that's a bit tough to judge from a Friday matinee.
  7. I’m not that bullish on Blade Runner as some people are. Outside of the internet geek realm, the original/previous BR evokes far more “never heard of it” or “haven’t seen it” responses than it does “loved it” responses. Also, Gosling still has not proven he can open a movie to huge numbers despite being around for over a decade. Granted, the film’s strong reviews will undoubtedly help draw out more adults, which it is going to need as this is not a sci fi film with strong youth appeal like GotG. It’s running time also doesn’t help. I’m guessing somewhere around $45M for the weekend. I will be surprised if it exceeds $50M.
  8. I feel so old having watched almost all of these movies in theaters during their initial run. Where’s that Matrix tech where information is downloaded directly into your brain? It would speed up almost everything.
  9. Yeah, any movie that can’t hit a true 4.00 multiplier after opening north of $100M is an abject failure. Definitely pay no attention to GotG2 and SMH both failing to reach a 3.00 multiplier. Talk about franchise ending embarrassments!
  10. Wonder Woman is now just under $1M away from a 4.000 multiplier. I'm not sure she can make it but she will probably reach 3.995 or a little higher. It's still an amazing accomplishment, though.
  11. IT will likely finish with legs somewhere in the 2.6-2.8 range, which is a healthy multiplier for a horror film. I think people are unfairly expecting ridiculous multipliers after Split and Get Out. IT was never going to be a WOM giant given its massive OW. It's going to be a long time before we see another horror movie open north of $100M or cross $300M domestically.
  12. I hadn't realized it had been 20 years since Howard made a good film. And his highest grossing film is still a year away.
  13. The success of IT has changed nothing as of yet, let alone producing an impact for years. Also, you're now trying to use "a story" instead of "the story" to define the discussion and that distinction is significant. That's fine except the starting point was the post with "the box office stories" text. I wasn't arguing the "a story" point that you have now pivoted to here. Please feel free to continue discussing the "a story" subject. I may chime in again if you complete the 360 and return to "the story" discussion.
  14. There will likely be a 2017 wrap-up in late December or early January from many websites and publications. IT won't be the lead story in any of them. At best, the film will be name checked in the first paragraph or two before being discussed in more detail later in the story. Go back and read prior recaps if you think I'm wrong.
  15. Surprises are never the leading story. The top grosser is the lead story. Sometimes they overlap if you apply restrictive criteria, such as the story of the 2017 summer. When taking account the entire year, the surprises are not the lead story. People may have pet stories or favorite films or other agendas to push but it all comes down to money grossed in the end.
  16. A surprising gross is never a greater story than a higher gross. If that was the case, then Hidden Figures or Get Out would be the story. IT was pegged to be a hit at least two full months before being released. Very few predicted HF or GO to be massive successes the day before they opened.
  17. Beauty and the Beast (and most long term box office followers) would disagree. Beauty opened more than $50M above IT and will finish around $180M-$200M more domestically. Films that open in March are never the highest grossing film of the year come September, let alone by about $100M. That's what Beauty has accomplished this year. While IT is certainly a massive success and a huge story, it is not the story of the year. If the film can gross an additional $300M this year, then I will change my mind.
  18. Let me second the recommendation of Jackie Brown. The film is very entertaining with a terrific performance by Pam Grier. It made my list, fwiw.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.