Jump to content

lilmac

Free Account+
  • Posts

    9,503
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by lilmac

  1. Here are tough ones: Kate Hudson Goldie Hawn Ryan Reynolds Zac Efron
  2. Thanks for this thread. I am reminded just how long it's been since I last saw SL. I am thinking back to the time NBC aired it unedited. The Year was 1997. Wow, time flies because that the last time I saw what is one of Spielberg's very best. Adding it to my netflix queue now... A+
  3. The film that started it all. Great characters, awesome villain, amazing space battle scenes, the beginnings of a fantastic journey. A+
  4. Lisa, thanks for your indepth explanation of why.
  5. http://imgur.com/a/G38SF Here's a guess: Previous casting descriptions matched with cast members. Late-teen female, independent, good sense of humour, fit. Daisy Ridley Young twenty-something male, witty and smart, fit but not traditionally good looking. John Boyega A late twentysomething male, fit, handsome and confident. Domhnall Gleeson Seventy-something male, with strong opinions and tough demeanour. Also doesn't need to be particularly fit. Max von Sydow A second young female, also late teens, tough, smart and fit. AXED? Forty something male, fit, military type. Oscar Isaac Thirtysomething male, intellectual. Apparently doesn’t need to be fit. Adam Driver
  6. $7.6/$29m A sequel to The Happening except instead of wind, snow is the enemy/monster. Rain of Pain
  7. Spielberg became widely seen as a mature director after Schindler's List. SL elevated him to the very elite, beyond just the most commercially successful director of all time. He became an auteur after SL.
  8. 1999 really was one of the best movie years in the last 30.
  9. Make that 3. Launched Lindsay Lohan's career too.
  10. How about we make a mini-game out of this? I'll name a celeb and you name the movie which made them famous. Kurt Russell
  11. That's a movie that is very rewatchable but shouldn't be. haha
  12. LA has alot of divorcees who can identify with the movie. *runs for cover*
  13. Isn't this a bit early for Saturday numbers??
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.