WittyUsername

I’m glad that Gunn seemingly isn’t doing what I feared, which is keeping his stuff from the DCEU canon, while ignoring everything else, but I’m not sure where that leaves the Suicide Squad related shows that are being made. Maybe those shows will explain it.

I find it fascinating how these studios are apparently willing to risk their actors going on strike, just so they won’t have to pay their writers. Bunch of scumbags. I sincerely hope the SAG strikes now.

Oh hey, apparently James Gunn confirmed that TSS and season one of Peacemaker aren’t canon to the DCU. I guess that’s good to know.

The comics side of Marvel has gone out of its way to do things that mimic what’s going in the films. That was why they replaced the white Nick Fury with Nick Fury Jr.

Wasn’t Barbie’s release date set last year, after the Discovery merger was already completed?

How hard is it for Hollywood to just pay their writers? They really want to risk actors going on strike too?

It’s weird that WB would try to spite Nolan by scheduling their movie on the same date as his, while also reportedly trying to court him back. Then again, nothing WB does nowadays should surprise me.

Does it feel a bit sad to anyone that Batman is able to have a bajillion standalone movies that don’t involve other DC properties, but Superman can’t? This is going to be the first “solo” Superman movie in over a decade, and they’re already making a big deal out of how it’s going to set up a larger DC Universe, and how other notable DC heroes will be in it.

RDJ has seemingly made it clear recently that Iron Man was mostly just a paycheck for him, and that he wasn’t especially passionate about it. Of course, that doesn’t mean he wouldn’t come back if they offered him a lot of money, but would it really be worth it if he’s just going to phone it in?

That’s too bad for Finn Wittrock.

What trailer?

Isn’t it usually rare for an MCU movie to have all these set photos and reports about cameos from the trades?

This movie is definitely losing Disney money, but I’d say The Flash is a more embarrassing bomb. At least this won’t have a completely abysmal multiplier.

Would Oppenheimer flavored ice cream be laced with uranium or something?

Would people be mad if he didn’t get to wear the mask?

Gal Gadot showed up to the premiere. Is she in the movie after all?

Please note: if a person who works in entertainment makes a big deal out of their faith, chances are that they have some pretty reactionary views.

This is the Ruby Gillman of DC movies.

I’m going to revise my predictions up a bit from $80-100 million to $90-110.

Why do people keep assuming that Indiana Jones has much value as a brand without Harrison Ford? What is supposed to set Indiana Jones apart from his imitators, if not Harrison Ford?

I think he should give WWII a rest after this.

Yeah, at this point, I don’t know if buy that Mission Impossible will be the undisputed winner of July.

If randos on Twitter want to believe there’s no CGI in his films, that’s their fault. Nolan has never claimed something like that.

I used the obvious examples to illustrate my point about how even people who aren’t well versed in filmmaking should be aware that Nolan’s films have CGI, hence why I said “most people with common sense.” Seriously, where are you getting this idea that Christopher Nolan wants people to believe he’s some expert magician who can do what no other filmmaker can do? To my knowledge, there have been no quotes from him where he claimed that his movies have absolutely no CGI. All he’s been on record of saying is that he prefers to use practical effects whenever possible.