Lonergan, Parker, Scorsese, Villeneuve all look good to me (the first two's films have been seen and widely praised, Scorsese is Scorsese, and it feels like Sicario brought Villeneuve a ton of goodwill that could translate into a nom this time if he does justice to the supposedly incredible source material), which probably means that only one or two of them will get nominated in the end. But I'll go with them for now.
Not sure about the fifth guy. Eastwood and Hancock seem too safe/bland, Zemeckis hasn't made anything above-average since Cast Away, and did I miss the memo that Rob Reiner is suddenly a good director again after 20 years? Ang Lee's movie sounds fascinating but it also seems like something that could go off the rails pretty easily. I think I'll just go with James Gray because I'm a big fan and it's about time he got recognized already.