Empire Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 Wyatt or Lin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted December 15, 2014 Author Share Posted December 15, 2014 Title was updated shortly after with Duncan's name removed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The47th Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I love the premise of this upcoming comic book, in which the ST09 crew helps out Sisko to fight the Dominion http://www.startrek.com/article/kirk-sisko-team-up-in-idws-latest-comics-out-wednesday And Q also pops out because...why not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Futurist Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Crossover with Transformers, with Decepticons taking the place of the borgs ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted December 16, 2014 Author Share Posted December 16, 2014 Chris Pine Hints at 'Star Trek 3' Film Date 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted December 16, 2014 Author Share Posted December 16, 2014 Lets throw Bird, Whedon, Phil Lord & Chris Miller, Besson and Colin Trevorrow into the mix. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orestes Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Hitchcock or bust. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidensSword Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 How about Neil Blomkamp and they introduce an android into the new crew? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted December 16, 2014 Author Share Posted December 16, 2014 How about Neil Blomkamp and they introduce an android into the new crew? I think Blokamp only does his 'original' movies. After Elysium I don't think he is the best choice, need to wait for Chappie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Futurist Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Lars Von Trier or GTFO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talkie Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 http://badassdigest.com/2014/12/15/whats-going-on-with-star-trek-3/ When the news broke I told you I heard Orci was off the movie in everything but credit, and he took to TrekMovie.com to deny this. We'll see. I talked to some folks and have heard two different narratives about what happened in Orci's final days on Trek 3: one is that he quit because Paramount's notes on his script were untenable and the other was that Paramount shut the picture down a month ago and spent the time talking to other filmmakers before officially taking Orci off the project. Edgar Wright was offered the movie, but I'm assuming his experience with Ant-Man made him unwilling to pick up someone else's unfinished film. Maybe both narratives are true. I wonder if Paramount basically forced Orci to quit. If he did quit it was a surprise to many members of his pre-production team, who didn't see it coming. But what would have made him quit? What was the source of the disagreement between Orci and Paramount? Guardians of the Galaxy. That's the movie that has a bug up Paramount's ass, and they want Star Trek 3 to feel more like Guardians. This comes on the heels of the first two movies being respectable, solid earners but not the kind of home runs Paramount needs. They want the third film to be huge, and they want it to be huge overseas especially. They look at Rocket and Groot and then they look at Keenser and they wonder why he doesn't have more of a role. But really, the way other studios are trying to ape Marvel is pathetic. It's just as bad as the descent into darkness after TDK. Hollywood studios don't value true originality unless it originates somewhere else and can be copied on the cheap. Which means that most studios don't value originality at all. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TServo2049 Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 (edited) Originality is too risky, so instead let's copy what has already been proven to work. Except that what has already been proven to work almost always started out as a risk. A classic Hollywood paradox. Edited December 17, 2014 by TServo2049 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidensSword Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 (edited) Star trek isn't guardians and guardians isnt star trek. They should focus on making an awesome star trek movie that people will support, not adding comedy characters. It says they want more profit but if you look at where the brand was, I think theyve already brought it back to a great place. Hollywood is never satisfied. Edited December 17, 2014 by RaidensSword 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinHood26 Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 FRANKES..... if only. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Futurist Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 FRANKES..... if only. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jessie Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 I think Blokamp only does his 'original' movies. After Elysium I don't think he is the best choice, need to wait for Chappie. Why not, it was a well directed movie, the script just wasn't that great and im sure he wont be writing the script for Star Trek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted December 18, 2014 Author Share Posted December 18, 2014 Why not, it was a well directed movie, the script just wasn't that great and im sure he wont be writing the script for Star Trek Might be so, but as of now think there are better choices. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jandrew Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Saying "Wyatt, Tyldum, Espinola, and Lin" doesnt help me. Who? Subtitles people, I need subtitles! But seriously can we notbe so vague in the titles? Not everyone here is Jack Nevada and knows the entite Hollywood roster. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinHood26 Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Saying "Wyatt, Tyldum, Espinola, and Lin" doesnt help me. Who? Subtitles people, I need subtitles! But seriously can we notbe so vague in the titles? Not everyone here is Jack Nevada and knows the entite Hollywood roster. You're on a movie forum. I think you should get with the program. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jandrew Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 You're on a movie forum. I think you should get with the program. Hush chil' fo momma get dat switch. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
