Sunshine, Light, and Joy

 

This is a post that I've been thinking about for awhile. Recently, I opened up the discussion to other members of the staff to get their feelings on the matter, and their opinions generally matched mine, which is this:

Within the last year or so, there's been a steady increase of negative posts in movie threads. We've always had some heated discussions for some movies, but recently things have not only gotten more histrionic in those threads (generally speaking, the CBM ones), but they've started to spread to other franchises and other movies as well. I'm not talking about out-and-out trolling, I'm talking about members feeling they have to consistently shit on a movie (or studio, or star) simply because they aren't interested in the current project or projects. With every piece of news about a movie, it's now a virtual guarantee that there's a flood of people rushing to say they think it sucks, they don't like the current trailer/tv spot/actor/actress/director/concept. And I get it -- we all have movies we don't like, movies which we think are bad ideas, industry people that just don't appeal to us. But there's a fine line between expressing your opinion about this and doing it so often, with such consistency, that the collective emphasis of all of it basically brings down the entire thread and thus the entire forum.

There's no easy answer to this. We don't want to crush freedom of expression here. But at the same time, the spirit of this forum is for people to have fun talking about the movies they love and the box-office runs they love.

To have fun.

And while it may be fun -- in a sense -- to personally vent about a movie, or to vent at people who dare to enjoy something you don't, it doesn't bring fun to our community. In fact, it generally drags down the overall fun for everyone else. We've had people repeatedly mention to us over the last several months or so that in some cases they don't even bother going into some threads -- even for movies they're curious about! -- because they just don't want to deal with the overall mess those threads contain. And frankly, that matches the personal opinion of most of the staff as well.

So this post is both a request and a warning. 

The request: Next time you feel like taking a dump on a movie (or a topic) for the dozenth time, take a moment to consider whether it's really worth it. People probably already have a good idea of what your attitude about the project is. Maybe just put your posting energy into a movie that you enjoy and love or are excited about.

The warning: The staff is going to be taking a closer look at some of these threads and we'll be more active with temp thread-bans if we think it'll help the overall vibe of the forum. I'd rather we don't have to, but it's not going to constrain any of you too much if you aren't allowed to post about a movie you supposedly don't care about anyway.

Remember the words of Bill and Ted: "Be Excellent to Each Other".

They're just movies, guys. It's about having fun.

Welcome to The Box Office Theory — Forums

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Arlborn

Gold Account
  • Content count

    7,035
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

7,184 Likes

1 Follower

About Arlborn

  • Rank
    Blockbuster
  • Birthday

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    South America

Recent Profile Visitors

3,957 profile views
  1. I guess people were dismissing Transformers a bit too early over here. It's not a juggernaut anymore but it should make enough off this numbers for a sequel to make sense, no?
  2. Of course it is and I did acknowledge it. But "scammed"? Way too strong a word for something like that, that's all I meant.
  3. Scammed is a very silly word to use in this situation. I'm sure they had their own analysts assess how much it was worth for them and how risky it was, they can't claim to have been scammed. But yeah, I'm glad that the company itself won't fold or anything similar if this one doesn't do well. It would make it more difficult for them with distributors in the future but at least they're still alive.
  4. Precisely. This is gonna do great this weekend, hopefully.
  5. Small role? Shame. Maybe it will lead to a spin-off after all, who knows.
  6. I quite enjoyed all Transformers o some level, even the second but I do agree it has some uncomfortable parts.
  7. 40M? How though? 12.5 13 11.5 37M... Those are TF3 drops I'm giving it, which it seems to be kinda following so far(drop-wise)...
  8. It was a honorable defeat! 18k short is a lot better than 7M short @WrathOfHan This one is going over 26M though so it's fine.
  9. Don't forget my hundreds of likes @WrathOfHan
  10. From your mouthfingers to their earseyes please.
  11. It's a review aggregator; the ship has already long sailed on your whole "lazy" point from the moment RT came into existence and became popular. We all know anyone could actually just google each of their favorite critics reviews if they wanted to but the whole point of an aggregator is to make things easier, faster and more dynamic in an age where that's what most people want. Well, that and shiny numbers. But yeah, I'm glad you get my overall point.
  12. Oh I have no idea, it's just that once you start hearing studios talking about its impact on trades the whole "where there's smoke there's fire" scenario starts to play out in my head. The only thing I'd love for them to do is to make it easier for people to check the consensus among their favorite critics, I think that would make a lot of sense as a next step to make it more user-friendly but I imagine that's no what the studios have in mind for it. As i said, I have no idea.