He didn't review cinematic technique, sure, but he did review screenwriting technique. I mean, it would be hilariously ironic, except your own posts are unnecessary long, convoluted, and making also meaningless points. So I guess that's irony squared? Anyways, yeah his review is his opinion. That's what a review is and in fact the best criticism pieces aren't impartial. It's an opinion piece and once again, it's a pretty valid one. You can feel free to disagree but considering how all you've done is try to discredit his opinion (hence why you try to claim he doesn't have a technical breakdown of the film's storytelling, which he does, but it's a rant), I take it you can't actually piece together a defense of the film.