Eric Quinn

This is from Jordan Peele?! Wow.

http://screenrant.com/taylor-lautner-ditches-max-steel-for-stretch-armstrong-ross-46806/ So filmlover was kinda sorta right. Man, Lautner's career would've been really interesting if Abduction didn't bomb his career

http://deadline.com/2016/10/bleed-for-this-will-now-hit-theaters-in-november-1201830910/ No limited release. It's now going wide on Nov. 18th.

Implying it even had a chance to begin with.

It still looks better than last October.

I want to say it was Stretch Armstrong, although I could be wrong on that.

I still have no idea what it is or where it came from lol

What's SOTM?

Why that's very interesting *cough*Go to my club*cough*

1. La La Land 2. Fences 3. Moonlight 4. Passengers 5. Lego Batman 6. Rogue One 7. Fantastic Beasts 8. Moana 9. Doctor Strange 10. Silence

Did you get the Patriots Day trailer? If so, was it any good?

Who's @I Might Not Be A Curse, chopped liver?

Pay no attention to the troll.

It's September.

To be fair, I don't think many parents will take their kids to the movies on a school night.

I'm a simple man. I see Daisy Ridley's in a movie, I go to that movie.

My girl Anya's returning like a phoenix after Morgan turned her into ash.

The thing that's interesting is that 2015 was kind of a precursor to this; The only movies that ended their run at $200M were Mockingjay Pt. 2, Martian, Cinderella, and Spectre, and the latter two had some fudge in their numbers, so it's debatable if they truly count. I guess in today's world of rising ticket prices and shorter theater-to-ancillary windows, so this will likely be the new norm. I'm almost guaranteed that next year will be a repeat. Even the movies that I currently predict will be in the $200M range (Lego Batman, Kong, Fast 8, Apes, Dunkirk, Ninjago, Thor, Coco) I have a strong suspicion will fall below or rise above that range.

Looks decent, I guess.