They rank films, it's strange. All Time Blockbuster, Blockbuster, Super Hit, Hit, Semi-hit, Flop, Disaster, and I see so many analysts spending time developing various criterion for these rankings. Some of them base it on financial success, while others base on legs. It makes sense to judge based on these factors, but you don't see anyone on here trying to develop different rankings. It's just weird to me, to try and use a strict system to determine whether one film was more successful than another