Deathlife Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 I think it's the same 3-4 users claiming MoS run is disappointing.Which is just silly.Legs or no legs, any movie that gets to $700M is a success.Which actually makes TASM success even more surprising considering how well it did outside the states. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Futurist Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 Robocop director is great, his brazilian films set in favelas were amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecstasy Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 Thanks and very good memory. I still watch JC every now then, because it's on Starz/Encore all the time. Though it's mostly background noise these days while I'm doing other things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 How about JURASSIC PARK lV? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#ED Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 So Punisher really started the reboots? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitik Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 Which is just silly.Legs or no legs, any movie that gets to $700M is a success.Which actually makes TASM success even more surprising considering how well it did outside the states. TASM was a major disappointment according to a lot of folks here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redfirebird2008 Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 I should've put a bunch of angry faces at the end. Scanners head explosion GIF. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impact Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 If your going to get that technical-Batman was a reboot of Batman 66 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmacader Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 WORLD WAR Z: $7.68M Monday / $74.09M Domestic Total / 3,607 Locations / $2,128 Location Avg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 Where there complaints about HULK being rebooted after just 5 years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 WORLD WAR Z: $7.68M Monday / $74.09M Domestic Total / 3,607 Locations / $2,128 Location Avg. https://twitter.com/BoxOffice/status/349589776090935296 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 Can WWZ make 180 M or more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impact Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 Where there complaints about HULK being rebooted after just 5 years? Oh yeah there were-most people were saying " A new Hulk? But the last one was so bad" People on the forms were saying "But its Marvel so it should do better" I don't think most would realize the difference since Hulk 2003 still had a Marvel logo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 Oh yeah there were-most people were saying " A new Hulk? But the last one was so bad" People on the forms were saying "But its Marvel so it should do better" I don't think most would realize the difference since Hulk 2003 still had a Marvel logo And then there was a different Hulk again in the TA. I'm not sure if a solo film is still possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Gary Scott Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitik Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 Oh yeah there were-most people were saying " A new Hulk? But the last one was so bad" People on the forms were saying "But its Marvel so it should do better" I don't think most would realize the difference since Hulk 2003 still had a Marvel logo I'm sure there are a lot of folks out there who see the Marvel logo in front of all the X-Men movies and keep waiting for Wolverine to show up in the next Avengers movie. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redfirebird2008 Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 Where there complaints about HULK being rebooted after just 5 years? No because Ang Hulk blew dogs for quarters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impact Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 No because Ang Hulk blew dogs for quarters. Reason why you should not get a art house director to do a superhero film. (And someone who never read the comics or knew that much about the Hulk) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kvikk Lunsj Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 I'm sure there are a lot of folks out there who see the Marvel logo in front of all the X-Men movies and keep waiting for Wolverine to show up in the next Avengers movie. That is why Fox should hint at in the trailer and the TV spots. Wolverine could hit a 120m OW if that happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
