ecstasy Posted January 30, 2012 Author Share Posted January 30, 2012 When Galapagos island admissions are counted.Should be soon, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichWS Posted January 30, 2012 Share Posted January 30, 2012 Like everybody else, I certainly did not see Underworld holding like that. Fourth film in the franchise facing off against a Liam Neeson vs. wolf pic? I thought 60% for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop54 Posted January 30, 2012 Share Posted January 30, 2012 The figure I posted for The Grey is indeed correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Craig Posted January 30, 2012 Share Posted January 30, 2012 $12,352,805 for Underworld Awakening. It didn't drop much at all from the estimates. Awesome!Sweet!!! Total Win for UA!!!Should be at about $50m going into SuperBowl weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecstasy Posted January 30, 2012 Author Share Posted January 30, 2012 (edited) The figure I posted for The Grey is indeed correct.I know you got it from Boxoffice.com. But are you sure it's correct? There is no daily breakdown for it. It's all one lump sum. Maybe the studios didn't give them the dailies. I don't know, lol. Edited January 30, 2012 by ECSTASY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishstick Posted January 30, 2012 Share Posted January 30, 2012 Like everybody else, I certainly did not see Underworld holding like that. Fourth film in the franchise facing off against a Liam Neeson vs. wolf pic? I thought 60% for sure.I think it`s inflated by the fact that Selene wasn`t in #3 since it was a prequel. If UA came out after UE it would most likely drop due to lack of Scott Speedman. But this way,m fans who boycotted #3 are now back in force. Still, Bitch India should turn people off so I guess that the movie would have done even better if it had Kate + Scott and no Bitch India. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop54 Posted January 30, 2012 Share Posted January 30, 2012 (edited) I know you got it from Boxoffice.com. But are you sure it's correct? There is no daily breakdown for it. It's all one lump sum. Maybe the studios didn't give them the dailies. I don't know, lol.On the front page it lists weekend actuals and that's the number they have for it. They wouldn't frontpage the list of actuals if it wasn't the real total. Edited January 30, 2012 by Bishop54 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecstasy Posted January 30, 2012 Author Share Posted January 30, 2012 On the front page it lists weekend actuals and that's the number they have for it. They wouldn't frontpage the list of actuals if it wasn't the real total.Ahh got it thanks! I see the breakdown is on Mojo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiccup Posted January 30, 2012 Share Posted January 30, 2012 Big drop for The Grey but still a great total compared to weekend predictions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopher Posted January 30, 2012 Share Posted January 30, 2012 Holy hopping hell, Hugo! Look at that 13% Sunday drop! Paramount might as well expand this back to 2000 theaters. Its PTA all month has been very strong. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecstasy Posted January 30, 2012 Author Share Posted January 30, 2012 4 Agneepath $1,140,464 -- 132 -- $8,640 $1,213,096 1 Eros EntertainmentThis is interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prime Mover and Shaker Posted January 30, 2012 Share Posted January 30, 2012 I think it`s inflated by the fact that Selene wasn`t in #3 since it was a prequel. If UA came out after UE it would most likely drop due to lack of Scott Speedman. But this way,m fans who boycotted #3 are now back in force. Still, Bitch India should turn people off so I guess that the movie would have done even better if it had Kate + Scott and no Bitch India.This is the first film I've seen India in. I thought she did alright - why the venom? Did she do a flick with Miranda Otto? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impact Posted January 30, 2012 Share Posted January 30, 2012 How embarsing Albert Nobbs has the worse PTA out of any film opening this weekend outside of a very limited IFC film.(Although I realized right as I was about to post this that Man on the Ledge had a lower PTA)Still very embarsing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenoZodiac Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Like everybody else, I certainly did not see Underworld holding like that. Fourth film in the franchise facing off against a Liam Neeson vs. wolf pic? I thought 60% for sure.Underworld 2 and 3 both dropped around 56-57% on the last weekend of January. I thought Awakening certainly won't do better, perhaps worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishstick Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 This is the first film I've seen India in.May that be the last. Venom is for yet another talentless Hollywood kid getting a role she isn`t suited for. The bitch is 18 playing the most unconvincing 12 years old ever. Whatever happened to 12 years old actresses? Oh, they don`t have parents in the business, right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fake Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 4 Agneepath $1,140,464 -- 132 -- $8,640 $1,213,096 1 Eros EntertainmentThis is interesting.Nice opening considering it is a Bollywood masala action film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop54 Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 May that be the last. Venom is for yet another talentless Hollywood kid getting a role she isn`t suited for. The bitch is 18 playing the most unconvincing 12 years old ever. Whatever happened to 12 years old actresses? Oh, they don`t have parents in the business, right.Did you even see Underworld Awakening? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishstick Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 No. I`m not contirbuting to Bitch India boxoffice but I`ve seen more than enough on that horrid show Secret Life of An American Teenager that started the Teen Mom craze. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop54 Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 No. I`m not contirbuting to Bitch India boxoffice but I`ve seen more than enough on that horrid show Secret Life of An American Teenager that started the Teen Mom craze.But since you haven't seen it how can you say she isn't credible as a 12 year old girl? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishstick Posted January 31, 2012 Share Posted January 31, 2012 Seen trailers. She definitely doesn`t look 12 but 12+ 6 at least. And synopsis says her character is 12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
