rockNrollaDIM Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 Is she? Getting peed on by Zac Efron doesn't exactly scream glamour That is so unfair. She peed on him, ok? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojoguy Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 thu looking likeTB 2.4,WTM 2,MI 1.8,Pla 1.4,Ely 1.2,KA2 900k Awful for MI! What a massive flop! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxmoser3 Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 That better than beautiful creatures?not in the l Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dashrendar44 Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 (edited) I appreciate their beauty but to be perfectly honest.. Audrey Hepburn and Grace Kelly do nothing for me. I much prefer (all mixed up) Ava Gardner, Raquel Welch, Ann-Margret, Cyd Charisse, Gene Tierney, they were red hot. OTOT, I was so shocked when I learn that Rita Hayworth was a totally fake Hollywood starlet made by studios, a spanish brunette girl turned into a hot ginger WASP. Plastic surgery was already raging in Hollywood. Edited August 23, 2013 by dashrendar44 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Nevada Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 (edited) I much prefer (all mixed up) Ava Gardner, Raquel Welch, Ann-Margret, Cyd Charisse, Gene Tierney, they were red hot. Yes! To me Audrey Hepburn and Grace Kelly were like pretty china dolls, but those you mentioned feel more like living, breathing women. You know what I'm trying to say? Edited August 23, 2013 by Jack Nevada Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxmoser3 Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 That better than beautiful creatures?not in the long run budget is 60 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.e012939110d2c4eb58cc16297e048d38.jpg)
