John Marston Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 How come everything jumped well except STID? Fuck this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JarJarBinks Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 (edited) WB's early TUE #s: $1.940 m for Hangover 3 and $0.965 m for Great Gatsby. Also Pt. 1: WB's MON numbers were revised upwards, $1.609 m for Hangover 3 and $0.807 m for Great Gatsby. Also Pt. 2: it's possible that WED's holds could be a bit better than normal this week since Game 1 of the NBA Finals is on Thursday. Edited June 5, 2013 by JarJarBinks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Somewhat misleading given Revenge of the Fallen, which opened on a Wednesday, grossed $200M+ for an opening five-day and barely managed to double that. Still, either way, the $400M+ D mark's pretty impressive no matter where you start. Not many flicks have grossed $400M+ D. Well I wouldn't call it impressive given the huge opening weekend. The 400 M number is great. But if one relates it to the OW, it's really not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Gittes Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Somewhat misleading given Revenge of the Fallen, which opened on a Wednesday, grossed $200M+ for an opening five-day and barely managed to double that. Still, either way, the $400M+ D mark's pretty impressive no matter where you start. Not many flicks have grossed $400M+ D. If you take away $91m ROTF made in its first two days (leaving it with $311m), it still has a 2.85 multiplier. Would've had 2.5+ in any case IMO. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyGossamer Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 If you take away $91m ROTF made in its first two days (leaving it with $311m), it still has a 2.85 multiplier. Would've had 2.5+ in any case IMO. So, in your opinion, Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince had an impressive multipler as well 221/77 = 2.87... If you take away the $80M it grossed its first two days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecstasy Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Well I wouldn't call it impressive given the huge opening weekend. The 400 M number is great. But if one relates it to the OW, it's really not. Well you have to take into consideration the massive number of previews IM3 had. That really skewed the opening weekend numbers imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdeezy Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 To me, multipliers lose importance when a film has incredible massive openings. I mean, its over 170 mill in 3 days..thats ridiculous anyway you look at it. And this was one of the most competitive May schedules we've had in a while. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Well you have to take into consideration the massive number of previews IM3 had. That really skewed the opening weekend numbers imo. It's still part of Friday. I don't think it's really that much of a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 To me, multipliers lose importance when a film has incredible massive openings. I mean, its over 170 mill in 3 days..thats ridiculous anyway you look at it. And this was one of the most competitive May schedules we've had in a while. The opening was massive. People expected a gross higher than 400 M. It looks like it's gonna crawl to reach that mark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecstasy Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 It's still part of Friday. I don't think it's really that much of a difference. It added about 10m more or less to the opening weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecstasy Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 To me, multipliers lose importance when a film has incredible massive openings. I mean, its over 170 mill in 3 days..thats ridiculous anyway you look at it. And this was one of the most competitive May schedules we've had in a while. Agreed. To make 400m while other films are making over 200m and over 100m at the same time is quite incredible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordmandeep Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 With im3 the film got a boost in admissions and audiences showed up in huge numbers opening weekend...As it was an established franchise it really was never going to break much past IM1 admissions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Agreed. To make 400m while other films are making over 200m and over 100m at the same time is quite incredible. But I thought it wasn't supposed to be affected? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plain Old Tele Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 The opening was massive. People expected a gross higher than 400 M. It looks like it's gonna crawl to reach that mark. $400m is a huge amount of money and obvious IM3 is a huge blockbuster. However, the OW had people realistically talking about passing TDKR, and (less realistically) talking about $500m as a goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecstasy Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 $400m is a huge amount of money and obvious IM3 is a huge blockbuster. However, the OW had people realistically talking about passing TDKR, and (less realistically) talking about $500m as a goal. But it's like anything else on this board, over reactions abound. Don't recall what people were saying about TDKR. The only person I remember talking about 500m was BKB. However, the point is you can say what you want, but 400m amid all this competition is nothing to sneeze at regardless of how it got there. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecstasy Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 But I thought it wasn't supposed to be affected? Who said that? I didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Who said that? I didn't. Ehem. They know who they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 $400m is a huge amount of money and obvious IM3 is a huge blockbuster. However, the OW had people realistically talking about passing TDKR, and (less realistically) talking about $500m as a goal. Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plain Old Tele Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 But it's like anything else on this board, over reactions abound. Don't recall what people were saying about TDKR. The only person I remember talking about 500m was BKB. However, the point is you can say what you want, but 400m amid all this competition is nothing to sneeze at regardless of how it got there. You don't even need to say "competition". $400m is a huge gross, irregardless. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdeezy Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 But I thought it wasn't supposed to be affected? No one expected Gatsby to break out, but damn near everyone assumed STiD and FF6 were going to do major damage to IM3's run. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
