ravon80 Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 (edited) WTF is salander?www.google.com Edited December 24, 2011 by ravon80 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tawasal Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 GWTDT. Her name is Lisbeth Salander.Is it Rooney's character? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tawasal Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 www.google.com What's wrong if I ask the mempers in here. And it's more fun in here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glassfairy Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 Is it Rooney's character?Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladyevenstar22 Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 Internet hipster chicks swear by Salander. The rest of the world swears by Bella.ha ha ha :lol: nice ! even if its not meant as compliment its still funny! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
efialtes76 Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 BOM:http://boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopher Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 Jolie's movie bombed. The Artist had a surprisingly bad expansion, Marilyn had a terrible expansion. This is not the year of limited releases. Or wide releases, for that matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FilmBuff Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 It has been a bad year for Oscar contenders, none of the them were able to break into mainstream successes like last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Founder / Operator Shawn Robbins Posted December 24, 2011 Founder / Operator Share Posted December 24, 2011 (edited) It probably helped that last year's had a ton of mainstream appeal. King's Speech, True Grit, and even Black Swan had elements friendly to wide audiences. None of this year's do. Sadly, this Oscar season is looking like a pretty boring one in stark contrast to last year. The Academy is going to seriously regret their revoking of the 10 nominee rule, because unless Potter can sneak in with a nomination (and even that may not matter much) there's really no reason for people to watch the show this year.Well, other than Billy Crystal. Edited December 24, 2011 by ShawnMR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 Tin Tin's gross makes Tron Legacys look a lot better in comparison, which cheers me up immensely. Sorry I am so selfish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Founder / Operator Shawn Robbins Posted December 24, 2011 Founder / Operator Share Posted December 24, 2011 Tron had a solid marketing campaign. Tintin...I can't even begin to describe how awful Paramount has handled the film. Shame, too, because its quite good for the mo-cap animation genre.Then again, they probably saved some money by cutting back on the marketing...which might in turn help decide its fate when it comes to profitability. Still, chances of seeing that sequel aren't too good...and that kinda sucks, because this might have been the last best hope for mo-cap animated films. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonytr87 Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 It probably helped that last year's had a ton of mainstream appeal. King's Speech, True Grit, and even Black Swan had elements friendly to wide audiences. None of this year's do. Sadly, this Oscar season is looking like a pretty boring one in stark contrast to last year. The Academy is going to seriously regret their revoking of the 10 nominee rule, because unless Potter can sneak in with a nomination (and even that may not matter much) there's really no reason for people to watch the show this year.Well, other than Billy Crystal. War Horse, Hugo, and even Dragon Tattoo all have elements friendly to wide audiences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 War Horse, Hugo, and even Dragon Tattoo all have elements friendly to wide audiences.yeah, but they don't look like they will break out. Hugo is a flat out financial failure. No other way to describe it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockNrollaDIM Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 Damn. That's poor for DT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 Tron had a solid marketing campaign. Tintin...I can't even begin to describe how awful Paramount has handled the film. Shame, too, because its quite good for the mo-cap animation genre.Then again, they probably saved some money by cutting back on the marketing...which might in turn help decide its fate when it comes to profitability. Still, chances of seeing that sequel aren't too good...and that kinda sucks, because this might have been the last best hope for mo-cap animated films.yeah, but Tin Tin did have two huge names behind it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddddeeee Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 I don't think Jackson is a big name at all and Speilberg's name has been way overused this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FilmBuff Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 I could see War Horse doing about 60 million. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonytr87 Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 yeah, but they don't look like they will break out. Hugo is a flat out financial failure. No other way to describe itI know. What I was saying is mainstream appeal is not the sole reason last year's Oscar contenders broke out. Because this year we have quite a few that SHOULD appeal to a relatively wide audience, but they're not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 I know. What I was saying is mainstream appeal is not the sole reason last year's Oscar contenders broke out. Because this year we have quite a few that SHOULD appeal to a relatively wide audience, but they're not.well I hear Dragon Tattoo is a very dark depressing film and it is also based on a book so I don't see why it would break out. War Horse looks rather cheesy and ham fisted from the trailers IMHO so I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't break out. Hugo I am indeed confused why it is not doing better. I agree that there is a box office slump in general and maybe more people would check films like these out in a good box office year like 2009 or 2002 for instance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonytr87 Posted December 24, 2011 Share Posted December 24, 2011 I don't think Jackson is a big name at all and Speilberg's name has been way overused this year.He's a big name. I have no doubt that people know who he is. But that doesn't mean people are going to show up to everything he does outside of Tolkien. Same with Spielberg. As sad as it is, a director's name only draws people if it's paired with certain material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
