Jump to content

Neo

Alien: Covenant | 5/19/2017 | Who needs mystery?

Recommended Posts

I'm not comforted in the choice of the writer. Yes I know he was just one of the many writers of Green Lantern but that script was a mess. So I take it it'll be a reduced budget since it'll be just Shaw and David going to find "Paradise"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



I think the problem with Prometheus (and, similarly, Alien 3 & 4) is that the potential for a completely riveting tale is there, including huge questions like where did we come from, what's out there, how do we relate to it, etc.  Wonderful human questions, appropraitely wrapped up in a horror atmosphere, as that is definitely one possibility.

 

Few things frustrate us more than awesome potential only half-ass realized, and I thnk that aptly sums up the Alien franchise as a whole. ...and this applies very well specifically to Prometheus.  What a cool, cool idea, at times executed brilliantly, but ultimately fumbled enough to piss us off.

 

I am very much looking forward to Prometheus 2.  Yet I'm sure I'll be overwhelmed with cool possibilities that fall short in execution.

Edited by Prime Mover and Shaker
Link to comment
Share on other sites



I think the problem with Prometheus (and, similarly, Alien 3 & 4) is that the potential for a completely riveting tale is there, including huge questions like where did we come from, what's out there, how do we relate to it, etc.  Wonderful human questions, appropraitely wrapped up in a horror atmosphere, as that is definitely one possibility.

 

 

Kubrick has the good taste to keep it ambiguous in 2001. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kubrick has the good taste to keep it ambiguous in 2001. 

 

Ambiguous? He even didn't try to answer that question in 2001. I've seen that film two times and I hate the pretentious 'This answers where did we come from' statement.

 

The only think he suggests is that the evolution is always linked to violence.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Kubrick has the good taste to keep it ambiguous in 2001. 

 

Not so much ambiguous but Kubrick showed us things but didn't spell them out. So you interpret what you see but Kubrick's vision was clear as crystal and the whole movie illustrates and drives home that point: Mankind's evolution steps are painfully driven by an alien superior force and the unquenchable quest to understand its origin lead us beyond the borders of our conscience.

Edited by dashrendar44
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so much ambiguous but Kubrick showed us things but didn't spell them out. So you interpret what you see but Kubrick's vision was clear as crystal and the whole movie illustrates and drives home that point: Mankind's evolution steps are painfully driven by an alien superior force and the unquenchable quest to understand its origin lead us beyond the borders of our conscience.

 

Well, the movie did put us int that self-reflective inward journey of the mind. You cannot help to ponder about the whole Creation ideas even though the movie does not address it directly or explicitly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





why do people even hate on prometheus?

 

Because it's not a good movie. The script is terrible. Character development is non-existent. It's one of those movies that doesn't answer anything because it assumes we'll automatically we'll see the sequel.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites









why do people even hate on prometheus? it has a good box office and score on rotten tomatoes.. i personally liked it and i'm pretty sure most people did too

 

Because it's not a good movie. The script is terrible. Character development is non-existent. It's one of those movies that doesn't answer anything because it assumes we'll automatically we'll see the sequel.

 

This. The character motivations never make any sense. And they're poorly conceived: we're supposed to be following a scientific mission, but nothing in the setup or the actions makes that seem at all plausible. They might be the stupidest scientists shown on film... and considering there was a movie where Denise Richards played a nuclear physicist, that's saying something.

 

Plus the pacing is incredibly bad. It might not be the worst of any film I've seen, but it's close. There are multiple times when it's apparent that they suddenly remembered that "oh, yeah! this is supposed to be a sci-fi horror film" and then up and kill a bunch of characters.

 

There were only two scenes in the entire film that were remotely scary. One was the abortion. The other was the two guys in the relic with the worm thingy. (And that was predicated on them being monumentally stupid.)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites











Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.