Jump to content

Eric is Quiet

The Marvels | November 10, 2023 | Abandon All Hope Ye Who Enter

Recommended Posts





30 minutes ago, SpiderByte said:

Cinemascore isn't critical response though. There are movies that suck ass with great cinemascore and vice versa. Gran Turismo got an A, are you gonna seriously claim it's more popular than Multiverse of Madness based on that?

I was talking about audience reception. OW of GOTG 3 was muted due to the meh audience reception of the past couple of MCU projects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So this movie looks ok. was not a big fan of Captain Marvel though, but I'll probably see it. I'm thinking $200-$250m dom. which would be fine.. imo. or would that be bomb territory? I just don't see any scenario where this tops $300m at this pount.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites





4 hours ago, B D Joe said:

Quorum has this between where Quantumania and GOTG 3 were at the same point in their tracking. An opening between those two sounds right to me.

They only opened about 10 million apart iirc, and Quorums reliability doesn't seem super consistent. I think that between Guardians and Quantumania will be more accurate in terms of its legs tho 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Reviews don't mean shit if audience disagrees or simply has no interest in a movie even with glowing reviews. Mario was rotten on RT yet smoked critically raved Spiderverse because more people both dom and OS were interested in animated Mario than animated Spidey. OS in particular didn't really care for such version of Spiderman. But Mario didn't have live action tradition so it was right up everyone's alley in animated form. But if we went with reviews alone, Mario should have bombed and Spideerverse made Barbie numbers. 

 

Likewise, GOTG Vol 3 had somewhat muted critical reception compared to the first movie (forgot about second one's reception) but audience reception far exceeded critical one. Not that critical one was bad but was more "it's fine" rather than "what a great movie". But audience was in the latter group hence amazing WOM. 

 

Just saying that reviews don't always save or sink a movie.

Edited by Valonqar
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Valonqar said:

Reviews don't mean shit if audience disagrees or simply has no interest in a movie even with glowing reviews. Mario was rotten on RT yet smoked critically raved Spiderverse because more people both dom and OS were interested in animated Mario than animated Spidey. OS in particular didn't really care for such version of Spiderman. But Mario didn't have live action tradition so it was right up everyone's alley in animated form. But if we went with reviews alone, Mario should have bombed and Spideerverse made Barbie numbers. 

 

Likewise, GOTG Vol 3 had somewhat muted critical reception compared to the first movie (forgot about second one's reception) but audience reception far exceeded critical one. Not that critical one was bad but was more "it's fine" rather than "what a great movie". But audience was in the latter group hence amazing WOM. 

 

Just saying that reviews don't always save or sink a movie.

Spider-verse put up amazing numbers on a 10 budget.

 

Reviews destroy a movie only when they are below a ten like with Fan4stic.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites



6 minutes ago, Human said:

Spider-verse put up amazing numbers on a 10 budget.

 

Reviews destroy a movie only when they are below a ten like with Fan4stic.  

 

I'm not disputing that Spuderverse was a successs. It just wasn't nearly as big success as Mario if we go by reviews only. It was raved, Mario wasn't yet more people bought tickets for Mario and lets not forget that many of those tickets were for kids so lower price. Mario slayed in spite of unfavorable reviews.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Valonqar said:

 

I'm not disputing that Spuderverse was a successs. It just wasn't nearly as big success as Mario if we go by reviews only. It was raved, Mario wasn't yet more people bought tickets for Mario and let’s not forget that many of those tickets were for kids so lower price. Mario slayed in spite of unfavorable reviews.

In fairness, there’s a lot of similarities to Mario and the majority of the Disney Renaissance remakes. It didn’t have to be good, but rather just appeal to nostalgia.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



The first Black Panther did $523M OS w/o China and Russia. Wakanda Forever was at $389M before its uneventful Chinese release, where it did just $15M.

The first Captain Marvel did $527M OS w/o China and Russia. If The Marvels is to release in China, it could do anywhere between Quantumania ($39M) and GOTG 3 ($87M) or anything really at this point.

A BP-WF level drop gets this to $275M domestic and about $670M worldwide before China.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites





26 minutes ago, Valonqar said:

Reviews don't mean shit if audience disagrees or simply has no interest in a movie even with glowing reviews. Mario was rotten on RT yet smoked critically raved Spiderverse because more people both dom and OS were interested in animated Mario than animated Spidey. OS in particular didn't really care for such version of Spiderman. But Mario didn't have live action tradition so it was right up everyone's alley in animated form. But if we went with reviews alone, Mario should have bombed and Spideerverse made Barbie numbers. 

 

Likewise, GOTG Vol 3 had somewhat muted critical reception compared to the first movie (forgot about second one's reception) but audience reception far exceeded critical one. Not that critical one was bad but was more "it's fine" rather than "what a great movie". But audience was in the latter group hence amazing WOM. 

 

Just saying that reviews don't always save or sink a movie.

 

You are way over-simplifying how important reviews are. 

 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Quantumania presales started off very strong and then died off when the bad reviews came out.  Then on the other hand, GOTG3 started off kinda tepid until the good reviews rolled in.  Then it definitely was up to the audience reception and we know how that went.  Not going to say your wrong about audience reception mattering, just that the baseline start after good or bad reviews really shifts the starting point for that reception.  

 

We don't have enough data to show it, but just from the universal rejection of Quantumania to the really slow start to GOTG3, the general public for the MCU might be at the 'wait for reviews' phase and not just storming out for everything just because. 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



2 minutes ago, Deep Wang said:

 

You are way over-simplifying how important reviews are. 

 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Quantumania presales started off very strong and then died off when the bad reviews came out.  Then on the other hand, GOTG3 started off kinda tepid until the good reviews rolled in.  Then it definitely was up to the audience reception and we know how that went.  Not going to say your wrong about audience reception mattering, just that the baseline start after good or bad reviews really shifts the starting point for that reception.  

 

We don't have enough data to show it, but just from the universal rejection of Quantumania to the really slow start to GOTG3, the general public for the MCU might be at the 'wait for reviews' phase and not just storming out for everything just because. 

 

Would say quantumania had started cooling off before reviews hit but they sure as hell didn't help

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





1 minute ago, Bob Train said:

Why didn't Disney move The Marvels 1 week up? That would have lengthened the PLF window and alleviated the 2nd weekend drop.

A few things probably. They're not worried about Hunger Games, they want to maximize the chances that the strikes end in time for a promo tour, and they want to stay relatively close to Thanksgiving so the film still has juice over the holidays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



6 minutes ago, Deep Wang said:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Quantumania presales started off very strong and then died off when the bad reviews came out.  Then on the other hand, GOTG3 started off kinda tepid until the good reviews rolled in.  Then it definitely was up to the audience reception and we know how that went.  Not going to say your wrong about audience reception mattering, just that the baseline start after good or bad reviews really shifts the starting point for that reception.  

Not quite correct, as AMWQ had pretty weak sales pace after the opening surge. The poor reviews only pushed it down further, to one of (the?) worst finishes for an MCU Thursday 

 

The common thread is that the previous MCU fare appears to have pushed more people into wait-for-reviews/WOM camp, and I would expect Marvels to have a similarly tepid start to presales, but with potential to recover for OW and beyond 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.