Jump to content

XXRDJisDoctorDoom

The Marvel / MCU Thread || From Blade to Secret Wars, All Things Marvel!

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, ddddeeee said:

Raimi's shooting a new horror movie in January. If he's directing DS3, it won't be for 2026.

That's plenty of time. Horror movies do not have Marvel level budgets or shoots with some very few exceptions like IT 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





Here is why Spider-Man 4 might not release on December 18th, 2026:

 

There's currently an undetermined Denis Villeneuve/WB/Legendary film on that date, which could be Dune: Messiah or something else.

Spider-Man would probably have enough muscle to bully it off that date, but it would risk not having IMAX screens if the other side doesn't blink. Since Denis claimed the date first, he almost certainly got first dibs on IMAX exclusivity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



7 hours ago, HummingLemon496 said:

Here is why Spider-Man 4 might not release on December 18th, 2026:

 

There's currently an undetermined Denis Villeneuve/WB/Legendary film on that date, which could be Dune: Messiah or something else.

Spider-Man would probably have enough muscle to bully it off that date, but it would risk not having IMAX screens if the other side doesn't blink. Since Denis claimed the date first, he almost certainly got first dibs on IMAX exclusivity.

It was never going to. It's July 2026

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, HummingLemon496 said:

Somebody is saying $1.4-1.6B WW for Spider-Man 4. If it's a multiverse (or multiverse related) movie with connections to Doomsday on December 18th, 2026 then it could absolutely do that.


If the rumors are true then IW numbers/more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



9 hours ago, HummingLemon496 said:

Here is why Spider-Man 4 might not release on December 18th, 2026:

 

There's currently an undetermined Denis Villeneuve/WB/Legendary film on that date, which could be Dune: Messiah or something else.

Spider-Man would probably have enough muscle to bully it off that date, but it would risk not having IMAX screens if the other side doesn't blink. Since Denis claimed the date first, he almost certainly got first dibs on IMAX exclusivity.

Yeah because it's taking the July date Marvel "mysteriously" took off the schedule. If it really does tie into the end of Venom 3 somehow they're probably waiting to announce that/sign Hardy

Link to comment
Share on other sites



DP3 beating Barbie makes me wonder if the R-Rating has any hinderance on the DOM gross of movies. In other countries they make it so that anybody below 17/18 straight up can't see it but in the US any kid can watch it as long as they have somebody who's 18+ with them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, HummingLemon496 said:

DP3 beating Barbie makes me wonder if the R-Rating has any hinderance on the DOM gross of movies. In other countries they make it so that anybody below 17/18 straight up can't see it but in the US any kid can watch it as long as they have somebody who's 18+ with them

 

The answer is no, it doesn't. The only hindrance to R ratings having massive box offices is that studios typically make sure that their biggest pieces of content can appeal to the most people, and the most appealing films at the box office tend to be PG13. If Endgame, The Force Awakens or Avatar for some reason had an R rating, they would maybe lose 1-2% of their DOM BO.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites



3 hours ago, HummingLemon496 said:

DP3 beating Barbie makes me wonder if the R-Rating has any hinderance on the DOM gross of movies. In other countries they make it so that anybody below 17/18 straight up can't see it but in the US any kid can watch it as long as they have somebody who's 18+ with them


 

 

 

It was rated R because of blood and stuff so most people didn’t care. If it was because of sex/nudity then it would have hurt. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites









19 minutes ago, HummingLemon496 said:

Doctor Strange 2 had more hype than Deadpool 3 but it only made 2/3rds of it in domestic total. It's crazy how much they fumbled the bag. With good reception it would've made more than Maverick WW-China.

I wouldn't say that. Deadpool was/is considerably more popular as a character than Strange was, even before Wolverine was added. The real tell is Deadpool HELD much better, though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



4 hours ago, MightyDargon said:

I wouldn't say that. Deadpool was/is considerably more popular as a character than Strange was, even before Wolverine was added. The real tell is Deadpool HELD much better, though.

Nah, DS2 was more hyped. If it had as good reception as D&W it would've opened higher than D&W's $211.44M. DS2 was PG-13 so kids could add to the hype.

  • Like 1
  • ...wtf 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





1 hour ago, HummingLemon496 said:

Nah, DS2 was more hyped. If it had as good reception as D&W it would've opened higher than D&W's $211.44M. DS2 was PG-13 so kids could add to the hype.

The reception affected the legs not the OW. Even though the reviews were not great they were still in the mid 70's on RT.  Good enough to not cause it to go from 211+ to a mere lowly 187. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.