Ha, a Guardian journalist I follow on twitter just called the movie empty trash - certainly at odds with her own paper which gave it 5 stars.
Also (I haven't seen the movie but tiny spoiler regarding a song choice):
Dang, hadn't seen the RT in a while so that's quite a drop. Are we now allowed to say the movie is critically divisive (remembering that's no bad thing)?
Matt Damon turned down a role in the first Avatar even though Cameron offered him a 10% profit cut. https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/culture/article/matt-damon-christian-bale-ford-v-ferrari-interview
I think the double standard comes about primarily because they still insist on using a waaaaay past his prime Arnold. It's that Star Wars conundrum of not having enough faith in the conceit without the familiar actors.
Well I guess that was inevitable. I hope they're paying Neill a lot of money.
(PS: him and Goldblum have aged exceptionally well. JP was over a quarter of a century ago!)
Haha, I knew they couldn't resist the RDJ baiting. Even after he dies we're going to have Rogue One style CGI 'reimaginings' of his Iron Man, aren't we?
Vox Lux was good, though I can see why many didn't care for it.
I didn't even know this film existed so have no opinion about it bombing critically, except to say it's a travesty that Jon Hamm isn't a huge movie star already.