Matt Damon turned down a role in the first Avatar even though Cameron offered him a 10% profit cut. https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/culture/article/matt-damon-christian-bale-ford-v-ferrari-interview
I think the double standard comes about primarily because they still insist on using a waaaaay past his prime Arnold. It's that Star Wars conundrum of not having enough faith in the conceit without the familiar actors.
Well I guess that was inevitable. I hope they're paying Neill a lot of money.
(PS: him and Goldblum have aged exceptionally well. JP was over a quarter of a century ago!)
Haha, I knew they couldn't resist the RDJ baiting. Even after he dies we're going to have Rogue One style CGI 'reimaginings' of his Iron Man, aren't we?
Vox Lux was good, though I can see why many didn't care for it.
I didn't even know this film existed so have no opinion about it bombing critically, except to say it's a travesty that Jon Hamm isn't a huge movie star already.
Someone summed it up best talking about the 'Crimes' - the film has no second act. It's two hours of a first act that jumps straight to the third before the credits suddenly roll out of nowhere.
There'll be another but for god sake get a decent script first. If that means not allowing Rowling to do it then so be it.
Ah, glad reactions are good. Wasn't impressed by the trailer but I have a weakness for whodunnits and god knows and mid-budget movie aimed at adults is up against it these days.