ecstasy Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Cumberflop is totally catching fire Tumbl'r Sensation! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyGossamer Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Again, subjective. SUBJECTIVE. I love Shane Black's work, I always have. IM3 plays better as a sequel to Kiss Kiss Bang Bang than either IM2 or Avengers. And I love that James Gunn and Edgar Wright are about to be given the reigns to gigantic projects that will still feel like James Gunn and Edgar Wright movies. Harrumph, harrumph, harrumph... Couldn't agree more. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopher Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Only the pristine with the right TASTE saw through the sham that was The Avengers and knew that the other 200m superhero movie was TRULY (rolling the Rs) the BEST. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecstasy Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Only the pristine with the right TASTE saw through the sham that was The Avengers and knew that the other 200m superhero movie was TRULY (rolling the Rs) the BEST. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoolioD1 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiMOKmp0uZc 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishstick Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Careful with Cumberflop people. You know that Cumberflop is also in The Floppit and Floppit movies are on mod`s "endagered species - protect at all costs!" list. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chewy Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Watching both is one thing. Which did the discerning ones like better? Let's ask them, but make sure not to ask the tasteless ones. Should be easy to tell them apart 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leatherface Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Let's ask them, but make sure not to ask the tasteless ones. Should be easy to tell them apart Of course it is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishstick Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Only the pristine with the right TASTE saw through the sham that was The Avengers and knew that the other 200m superhero movie was TRULY (rolling the Rs) the BEST. TA was enormously fun and loaded with re-watchable charisma, lines, chemistry and interaction. It also had isnanely hot villain who attracted women unlike that other 200M movie starring Mumbles. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyGossamer Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Self-aware humor is the easiest, laziest kind there is. Not to mention the plot twist in IM3 that is totally lame. There's no edge to Iron Man 3. It's a Disney movie through and through. So... You didn't enjoy much of the humor in Trek 2 I take it then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockNrollaDIM Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Careful with Cumberflop people. You know that Cumberflop is also in The Floppit and Floppit movies are on mod`s "endagered species - protect at all costs!" list. :rofl: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
druv10 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 (edited) lol, Leatherface having an epic meltdown. Epicness will continue when Thor:TDW bludgeons STID and ends the year in top 5. Edited May 17, 2013 by druv10 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leatherface Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 So... You didn't enjoy much of the humor in Trek 2 I take it then? There was just enough and the movie was in no way kid friendly while The Avengers was neutered so even a 6 year old could enjoy it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiffMan Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 You know we have all these reasons why it didn't do well yesterday. People didn't know it opened yesterday. Too long in between films. Nobody knows who Cumberbatch is. How about a simple one? Most people decided to not go see the film yesterday. This. STiD is my most anticipated movie of the year, I'm old enough to have seen Wrath of Khan when it was released, and am a pretty huge Trek fan. So a big group of us are going to see it Saturday because that's the only day we could manage it and we bought tickets before the release date changed. I'm the target demographic and didn't see it yesterday. Big deal. I'll probably still see it twice this weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leatherface Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 lol, Leatherface having an epic meltdown. Epicness will continue when Thor:TDW bludgeons STID. The first Thor was one of the better Marvel movies because the director was actually something of an auteur. So what do they do? Go and get an unknown who can be bullied with ease. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chewy Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 There was just enough and the movie was in no way kid friendly while The Avengers was neutered so even a 6 year old could enjoy it I too am OUTRAGED that they made a movie 6 year olds can enjoy. How? Dare? They? Genre movies should only be enjoyed by males aged 14-30 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deathlife Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Very disappointed.Maybe Pararmount should have cut a deal and slapped a Marvel logo in front of this.I'm not the biggest Marvel cheerleader but those guys are full (at the moment) of so much win that its not funny anymore. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leatherface Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 I too am OUTRAGED that they made a movie 6 year olds can enjoy. How? Dare? They? Genre movies should only be enjoyed by males aged 14-30 God forbid they make a smart movie as opposed to one so dumbed-down that six year olds can follow it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChD Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Obviously it needs to be a three year wait. God. Of course. Cause against Avengers it's box office would be A-M-A-Z-I-N-G. 400M OW. Let's be serious. It'll make more this year, with the extra 1 year wait in which apparently people have been obliviated of this movie, than it would ever make against Vengies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted May 17, 2013 Author Share Posted May 17, 2013 http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=daily&id=startrek12.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
