CoolioD1 Posted January 20, 2015 Share Posted January 20, 2015 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementeleus Posted January 20, 2015 Share Posted January 20, 2015 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoolioD1 Posted January 20, 2015 Share Posted January 20, 2015 I'm looking forward to Linklater's guest appearance on the new season of Portlandia. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpha Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 HOODIE HOODIE HOODIE HOODIE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpha Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 Okay, so it's not the masterpiece the critics are raving about, but it's certainly the best film of 2014. The great thing about this movie is the acting and writing is so natural and organic. It's also impossible to ignore the massive achievement of filming a narrative feature over 12 years. Even though there's other films like the Up documentaries that have documented the lives of several people over the course of more than a decade, for a film that is actually scripted, and requires the dedication of so many actors and crew members, that it's just astonishingly unique and brilliant. It's a gimmick, yes, but gimmick is not an intrinsically bad word. Personally, that's why Richard Linklater should win Best Director at the Oscars this year, because of his dedication to such an enormous project, along with making a great film at that. Just a great movie that'll definitely stand the test of time. It's not one of the greatest ever, but it's ambition coupled with it's unconventional yet interesting narrative, organic acting, astounding screenplay and top-notch direction is genius. A Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 ^ Goodness, you're such a hipster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezen Baklattan Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 I feel like the naturalism and poignancy comes off a bit smoother in the Before trilogy, but it's such a unique and heartfelt achievement that I'm glad it's what is getting Linklater all this love. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luna Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 (edited) naturalism Before trilogy Edited January 21, 2015 by lisa 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luna Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 i'm just chuckling to myself at the awesomeness of that smiley. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadAtGender Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 This is an incredibly subtle film. There's very little in it that stands out and amazes, but it sort of layers and builds on itself to create this really wonderous thing. Around the two hour mark, it sort of hit me about just how difficult it must have been to pull this off. To keep the connection with the actors, some with appearances that are separated by several years, is amazing. And to have the consistency of character across that time makes it even more so. The story isn't deep in the sense that there's some message about greater meaning. But the film as a whole is sort of mind-blowing. It's about life. For Hawke and Arquette, they gave performances of a lifetime, because it took a good portion of their lifetimes to actually do. I don't know if I'd call it one of the greatest films of all time, but it's so incredibly unique I can't help but feel that the accolades are well deserved. For many films, we'll see something like them again, but I don't know if it'll be possible for anything like Boyhood to be done another time. Although it would be really cool to see someone try, though with an entirely different sort of story. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementeleus Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 Soderbergh had a glimmering of the same effect when he used clips of Terence Stamp from Ken Loach's 1967 film POOR COW as flashbacks for his character in THE LIMEY. Not quite the same thing, but very effective nonetheless. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyGossamer Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 (edited) Soderberg better direct a few more movies. Dude's such a freak talent. Limey's one his lesser seen gems. Edited January 21, 2015 by JohnnyGossamer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 The biggest compliment I can give this film is that for the first time in my life, it made me want to have kids. The first half of the film absolutely floored me. It had me laughing, crying and happy and giddy. It's kind of like watching a 3 hour Seinfeld episode. It's a story about nothing and yet everything. It's observant, poignant, touching, infuriating and so much more. I absolutely loved Hawke in this and he should have gotten a nomination over Cumberbatch. The last hour of the film is still good but it didn't quite live up to the first half. I still enjoyed it but at 2:45, it did feel a bit long. 8.5/10 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmlover Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 The biggest compliment I can give this film is that for the first time in my life, it made me want to have kids. The first half of the film absolutely floored me. It had me laughing, crying and happy and giddy. It's kind of like watching a 3 hour Seinfeld episode. It's a story about nothing and yet everything. It's observant, poignant, touching, infuriating and so much more. I absolutely loved Hawke in this and he should have gotten a nomination over Cumberbatch. The last hour of the film is still good but it didn't quite live up to the first half. I still enjoyed it but at 2:45, it did feel a bit long. 8.5/10 Hawke is nominated for this (in Supporting Actor). 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 Hawke is nominated for this (in Supporting Actor). Aha! I'm glad then. I thought he was lead, so good...glad he is. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 If for some reason they don't give it to Simmons, I hope Hawke gets it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementeleus Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 Hawke makes it all so effortless. You really forget he's acting. In fact, that's really true of all the principals -- more than anything else, I really felt like I personally knew the characters as people, and was rooting for them to be successful in their own ways. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadAtGender Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 Hawke seems to have an uphill battle for Supporting Actor. I could see Arquette getting Supporting Actress, though. (She's not my first choice, but Carmen Ejogo wasn't nominated, so...) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 My allegiance lies with Simmons, but if the academy decides that he is not quite their tempo, I hope Hawke is their man. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezen Baklattan Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 Hawke is probably second at this point, ahead of Norton, but I'd be shocked if Simmons didn't win. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...