Klingo Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 Its not that, it's just the principle of the matter and really what THG series stands for. It would be hypocritical to make a 3D version of it. IMax felt the same to me. IMAX version of CF was way different than the standard. Course I would not watch any of the movies in 3D. I rarely see any movies in 3D. Last movie was Avatar. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethan Hunt Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 Huh? Why would it be hypocritical to make it 3D or IMAX? Nobody's forcing you to watch it in those versions.. The argument that it doesn't need to be in 3D I understand. But why the hell wouldn't you want in IMAX? I certainly would like bto watch the epic finale on the local big ass IMAX screen. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4815162342 Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 I just don't know why people just don't come out and say it is not a good drop instead of pretending otherwise and giving false impressions You really have no clue, do you? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 You really have no clue, do you? What do you mean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4815162342 Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 What do you mean BOFTA's drop is exactly what was expected when you look at Middle Earth numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 BOFTA's drop is exactly what was expected when you look at Middle Earth numbers. You can't compare directly to 2003. This year most movies increased in Friday . Also the Lotr movies were dropping from higher numbers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wormow Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 IMAX is fine, because CF did it for creative reasons because the entire arena was all IMAX, it's "another world" and it worked in the film seamlessly. 3D doesn't really do anything for the franchise, not really a fan of seeing blood splattered out of the screen. I don't know, it just doesn't seem right. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klingo Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 IMAX is fine, because CF did it for creative reasons because the entire arena was all IMAX, it's "another world" and it worked in the film seamlessly. 3D doesn't really do anything for the franchise, not really a fan of seeing blood splattered out of the screen. I don't know, it just doesn't seem right. We must have it! 300 Rise of Empire style blood splatter on our eyes! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aplandg Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 IMAX is fine, because CF did it for creative reasons because the entire arena was all IMAX, it's "another world" and it worked in the film seamlessly. 3D doesn't really do anything for the franchise, not really a fan of seeing blood splattered out of the screen. I don't know, it just doesn't seem right. My guess is with it being post converted and pg-13 we won't see blood splattered out of the screen. We probably won't see much "made for 3D" shots. Mostly just depth. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric is Quiet Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 Y'know what I'm surprised by? Not the legs of Hobbit or Mockingjay, but how people are "surprised" at WiB2's performance being better than they thought. Hasn't horror movies in the first week always have a decent opening weekend for the past 4 or so years? While not fantastic, they do fine on the first weekend. Marked Ones, Texas Chainsaw 3D, Devil Inside. Course they all drop down hard, but still. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxmoser3 Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 So besides the holdovers it was decent to see Woman's 7 million debut it looks like Relativity will be happy for the sequel's debut of around 15-16 million(though I think 14-15 million looks more possible) and if it doesn't completely disappear off the charts then a gross above 30 million Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cozmeesah Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 They can't wait until after Insurgent to see if they would release MJ2 in 3D, regardless anyone's feelings on it. You think they'd be okay with 6 months to do a shitty post conversion for their finale? If they had ANY intentions of 3D for MJ2, they'd have shot it that way from the get go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchumacherFTW Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 They can't wait until after Insurgent to see if they would release MJ2 in 3D, regardless anyone's feelings on it. You think they'd be okay with 6 months to do a shitty post conversion for their finale? If they had ANY intentions of 3D for MJ2, they'd have shot it that way from the get go. Need for Speed announced it with 6 weeks to go and looked Awesome in 3D. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 3D will not happen for MJ2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Empire Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 3D will not happen for MJ2. Thankfully. It doesn't need it at all. Most movies don't really. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aplandg Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 3D will not happen for MJ2. I'm not as convinced. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethan Hunt Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 Thankfully. It doesn't need it at all. Most movies don't really. 3D is just awful. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Empire Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 3D is just awful. I only like it if the movie is filmed in 3D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 2003: http://boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/?sortdate=2004-01-02&track=returnoftheking.htm Enough said. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethan Hunt Posted January 3, 2015 Share Posted January 3, 2015 I only like it if the movie is filmed in 3D. Well done 3D gives me headaches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.4de077df62dcc33d50a8c55ab8391582.jpg)
