Jump to content

jb007

Tuesday Actuals: JW 24.3M | DOWN GOES TDK TUESDAY | Not the Spielberg, Cameron, or Nolan thread!

Recommended Posts

Spielberg would never let that happen.

Tele just explained Jurassic World already carried a production budget between $180M and $190M... You really don't believe Spielberg wouldn't allow the production costs of the sequel to mega earner approach/exceed $250M? Not unlike Jurassic World, Spielberg's an executive producer on Transformers 2 and Transformers 3, no?

Edited by JohnnyGossamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Find me one cinephile, movie historian or film critic that thinks TA is among the greatest films ever made and I'll find you a unicorn.

It's all about genre and TA is considered to be one of the greatest superhero movies ever made. There aren't top critics, as far as I know, who claim the Matrix is the greatest film ever made. But it hailed as one of the greatest sci fi films. Again, all about genre.

Edited by Clavius
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Tele just explained Jurassic World already carried a production budget between $180M and $190M... You really don't believe Spielberg wouldn't allow the production costs of the sequel to mega earner approach/exceed $250M? Not unlike Jurassic World, Spielberg's an executive producer on Transformers 2 and Transformers 3 too, no?

None of those even pushed $300 million tough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



70M+ if I had to guess. Sunday gross will hold really well.

Sounds reasonable. 

 

Now the question is that whether JW affects IO or vice versa and whether that impact is severe. May be they will coexist without hurting each other much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



None of those even pushed $300 million tough.

Spielberg is very budget conscious. War of the World had the highest approved budget in history at the time, but I don't think he went beyond $130m or so. He is a very responsible filmmaker when it comes to budgets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly, if you start going down the "deserves" rabbit hole then none of the mega blockbusters deserved what they made.

 

LOTR earned every penny, to be honest it should have crossed the 1B mark DOM for every movie :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites



None of those even pushed $300 million tough.

Spielberg is very budget conscious. War of the World had the highest approved budget in history at the time, but I don't think he went beyond $130m or so. He is a very responsible filmmaker when it comes to budgets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But who says their opinions are right? Generally I agree with RT, but there are movies I like and they don't and vice versa.

Obviously one wouldn't always agree. But they are still experts. There's no one better to look at that come closer to giving a perfect view of films/ quality of visual effects/ CGI etc etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites



People really need to divorce their personal opinions when talking about the box office.  There will always be movies that one considers to be terrible that will make big money.

 

For what it's worth, movies with record breaking opening weekends had mixed receptions more often than not.  Like:

 

Jaws 2

Every Which Way But Loose

Star Trek: The Motion Picture

Return of the Jedi

Temple of Doom

Beverly Hills Cop II

Ghostbusters II

Batman Returns

Batman Forever

Dead Man's Chest

Spiderman 3

 

I'm sure some of these films some of you absolutely love and some you absolutely hate.

Edited by Tubes
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously one wouldn't always agree. But they are still experts. There's no one better to look at that come closer to giving a perfect view of films/ quality of visual effects/ CGI etc etc...

Oh come on. Critics can be so picky and hard to please, and they can be known to over analyze. To me theyre no better than audience opinions. My personal opinion is #1. Not the critics.

Edited by Jandrew
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



SW OT, Jaws, JP, ROTK, Close Encounters, Ttianic, T2, Alien/Aliens, Saving Private Ryan, some of the Indiana Jones films and some animated films are pretty much the only modern age "blockbusters" you see on All Time lists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Exactly, if you start going down the "deserves" rabbit hole then none of the mega blockbusters deserved what they made.

I am not talking about deserving in any particular aspect. I am jUST saying that the very top grossers should be exceptional in one way or the other just like they always have been.

Edited by Infernus
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Sounds reasonable. 

 

Now the question is that whether JW affects IO or vice versa and whether that impact is severe. May be they will coexist without hurting each other much.

 

It would be like there's another 160M+ opener this week. Busy theaters this weekend for sure. Lots of kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Obviously one wouldn't always agree. But they are still experts. There's no one better to look at that come closer to giving a perfect view of films/ quality of visual effects/ CGI etc etc...

That's over-rated calling them an "expert". It's stupid because again its just their opinion. What makes them an expert? Because they watched more films than me? Because they went to school? Anyone with eyeballs and some sense of a brain can do what they do. Sometimes critics can be so full of themselves and really nit pick a movie.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Spielberg is very budget conscious. War of the World had the highest approved budget in history at the time, but I don't think he went beyond $130m or so. He is a very responsible filmmaker when it comes to budgets.

But, he's an executive producer. Trust me, I'd love it if he decided to direct the next one. He was executive producer for...

 

Transformers 2 - $200M+

Transformers 3 - $190M+

Transformers 4 - $210M+

 

...At the very least, I expect a $210M+ production budget for the next Jurassic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



I am not talking about deserving in any particular aspect. I am jUST saying that the very top grossers should be exceptional just like they always have been.

 

But the point is that most (if not all) of the previous record-holders weren't considered exceptional (by either some or many). It's just the way things go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



That's what i am stressing. Its not about personal opinions I am talking about!! Its the opinions of critics and experts that i am stating and not personal opinions.

Avengers did win any awards, did not make the AFI top films of 2012. AFI look for good films that also have culture impact.
Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.