mother! | 09.15.17 | Paramount | Darren Aronofsky, Jennifer Lawrence | Razzie Awards frontrunner

[straggler]

9 minutes ago, 75livesinDerry said:

 

oh it is, but I somewhat admire your passion for the movie nonetheless  

Helps to be a cinephile. We will not see something like this anytime soon. It was jaw-droppingly insane. Still amazed someone made this.

[75Live]

2 minutes ago, straggler said:

Helps to be a cinephile. We will not see something like this anytime soon. It was jaw-droppingly insane. Still amazed someone made this.

 

I am too, just haven't seen the movie yet.  Maybe I will feel that way, but maybe I won't.  I doubt I will like is as much as you seem to, but never know

[Kingp0va]

1 hour ago, Cochofles said:

You have got to be kidding.

People have already mentioned how this flopping will not impact Jlaw's career in the least, and I'll say this: I LOVE Lively, and her Hollywood profile was certainly boosted by the success of The Shallows, but Jennifer Lawrence is still the Hollywood starlet most likely to get sent the hottest scripts in town and cast in the hottest properties around. She has the box office numbers and the awards luster. Livelty might get there eventually, but she still is not on the same level as Jlaw, stardom-wise.

yeah, im trolling with blake, i doubt she'll ever come to close to jlaw's peak or get an oscar nom, but she's so underrated because of her looks

[That One Girl]

3 hours ago, Kingp0va said:

so another flop for jlaw, she cant breathe, thank god blake replaced her as the princess of hollywood

 

lmao you're fucking delusional

[Kingp0va]

6 minutes ago, That One Guy said:

 

lmao you're fucking delusional

and you cant read the posts before replying

[straggler]

Rex Reed labeled this the worst movie of the century. Future classic confirmed. 

[That One Girl]

Just now, Kingp0va said:

and you cant read the posts before replying

 

I saw this post while catching up on this thread so excuse me for not being up to date

[TalismanRing]

James Verniere/ Boston Herald

 

Yes, points for being original. But why is it so boring and unpleasant? Calling Lars von Trier. All is forgiven.

 

[AJG]

4 minutes ago, TalismanRing said:

James Verniere/ Boston Herald

 

Yes, points for being original. But why is it so boring and unpleasant? Calling Lars von Trier. All is forgiven.

 

Where is the lie in this statement?

 

I was told this was gonna be thought provoking. That I was gonna be debating what it all means. 

[TalismanRing]

10 minutes ago, AJG said:

 

Where is the lie in this statement?

 

I was told this was gonna be thought provoking. That I was gonna be debating what it all means. 

 

Maybe, but apologizing to and longing for Von Triers....  

[TalismanRing]

43 minutes ago, straggler said:

Rex Reed labeled this the worst movie of the century. Future classic confirmed. 

 

Reed (messy as he is) can sure write a blistering negative review (filled to the brim with SPOILERS)

 

http://observer.com/2017/09/darren-aronofsky-mother-worst-movie-of-the-year/

 

 

Edited September 15, 2017 by TalismanRing

[WrathOfHan]

Don't read the Cleveland Plain Dealer's review because it spoils the films most shocking moment in the first sentence. The author is defending what he wrote in the comments by saying the film has no spoilers. Fucking asshole.

[AJG]

6 minutes ago, TalismanRing said:

 

Maybe, but apologizing to and longing for Von Triers....  

100% agree.

 

Nymphomaniac was not the erotic thriller I thought it would be. 

[Alli]

8 minutes ago, TalismanRing said:

 

Reed (messy as he is) can sure write a blistering negative review (filled to the brim with SPOILERS)

 

http://observer.com/2017/09/darren-aronofsky-mother-worst-movie-of-the-year/

 

 

I thought he was fired from the observer...

[AJG]

3 minutes ago, WrathOfHan said:

Don't read the Cleveland Plain Dealer's review because it spoils the films most shocking moment in the first sentence. The author is defending what he wrote in the comments by saying the film has no spoilers. Fucking asshole.

Kinda. To anyone raised with the materials this film is based on I can see how there wouldn't be full spoilers, but the true spoilers lie in how events take place rather than what the events are.

[straggler]

17 minutes ago, TalismanRing said:

 

Reed (messy as he is) can sure write a blistering negative review (filled to the brim with SPOILERS)

 

http://observer.com/2017/09/darren-aronofsky-mother-worst-movie-of-the-year/

 

 

Very spoilery. Be forewarned.  

Edited September 15, 2017 by straggler

[Jeriosnal]

This might actually damage Lawrence's career, as audiences will not trust her judgment after this.  If she isn't in the Tarantino movie, ooh boy.  Red Sparrow could be lousy, and then Kinberg's X-Men movie?  

[That One Girl]

2 minutes ago, Jeriosnal said:

This might actually damage Lawrence's career, as audiences will not trust her judgment after this.  If she isn't in the Tarantino movie, ooh boy.  Red Sparrow could be lousy, and then Kinberg's X-Men movie?  

 

it won't damage her career because not enough people will see it.

[TalismanRing]

11 minutes ago, Alli said:

I thought he was fired from the observer...

He was layed off with a lot of other long time staff. Maybe he's a freelancer for them now.

[Jeriosnal]

4 minutes ago, That One Guy said:

 

it won't damage her career because not enough people will see it.

True of Serena, but not this.  This is opening wide.