AVENGERS ENDGAME | 1939.4 M overseas ● 2797.8 M worldwide

[Tag 2]

2 hours ago, Nero said:

Population growth in India is at 1.5% now compared to 1960-70 it was 3%. So the population did increase but it wasn't much. Also movies in 20th century used to stay in theatres for more than 2-3 years and used to gross less but admission were high. Now movies don't last more than 2-3 months in theatres and also they gross more but admissions are way too low. So End game can be called as blockbuster movie in India whereas Titanic was just hit movie...

You are wrong,acorrding to india offical box office website,eight Hollywood movie was be called Blockbuster in India:Jurassic Park,Titanic spiderman3,2012,Furious7,The Jungle book, Avengers Infinity War,and EG.

You only consider about some movie on screen in more and more time,you forget the number of screen are increase ,and number of cinema.

[Tag 2]

2 hours ago, salvador-232 said:

Then why Chile went from 75 million admission in 1967 (with a population of 9 million) to 28m admission in 2018 (with a population of 18m)? And then why the number of cinemas in the center of the capital went from 37 in the 60's to just one today ? 

 

Is almost as there are different factors behind admissions than just population increase.

Yes,you are right,so there is no competition bewteen a movie which from two different,Titanic beat Chile box office record,EG did it too.In my country China,Titanic beat box office record,EG take the third place,after WW2  and The wandering earth.

[terrestrial]

Maybe for some here of interest...

 

In Germany we us comma and dots in the opposite way as in the US

Quote

year	admissions	Euro
2018	105,4 Mio.	899 Mio.
2017	122,3 Mio.	1.056 Mio.
2016	121,1 Mio.	1.023 Mio.
2015	139,2 Mio.	1.167 Mio.
2014	121,7 Mio.	980 Mio.
2013	129,7 Mio.	1.023 Mio.
2012	135,1 Mio.	1.033 Mio.
2011	129,6 Mio.	958 Mio.
2010	126,6 Mio.	920 Mio.
2009	146,3 Mio.	976 Mio.
2008	129,4 Mio.	795 Mio.
2007	125,4 Mio.	758 Mio.
2006	136,7 Mio.	814 Mio.
2005	127,3 Mio.	745 Mio.
2004	156,7 Mio.	893 Mio.
2003	149,0 Mio.	850 Mio.
2002	163,9 Mio.	960 Mio.
2001	177,9 Mio.	987 Mio.
2000	152,5 Mio.	824 Mio.
1999	149,0 Mio.	808 Mio.
1998	148,9 Mio.	818 Mio.
1997	143,1 Mio.	751 Mio.
1996	132,9 Mio.	672 Mio.
1995	124,5 Mio.	605 Mio.
1994	132,8 Mio.	628 Mio.
1993	130,5 Mio.	598 Mio.
1992	105,9 Mio.	456 Mio.
1991	120,0 Mio.	501 Mio.
1990	102,5 Mio.	425 Mio.
1989	101,2 Mio.	405 Mio.
1988	108,9 Mio.	420 Mio.
1987	108,1 Mio.	417 Mio.
1986	105,2 Mio.	401 Mio.
1985	104,2 Mio.	396 Mio.
1984	112,1 Mio.	413 Mio.
1983	125,3 Mio.	446 Mio.
1982	124,5 Mio.	433 Mio.
1981	141,3 Mio.	481 Mio.
1980	143,8 Mio.	463 Mio.
1979	142,0 Mio.	434 Mio.
1978	135,5 Mio.	383 Mio.
1977	124,2 Mio.	334 Mio.
1976	115,1 Mio.	303 Mio.
1975	128,1 Mio.	320 Mio.
1974	136,2 Mio.	314 Mio.
1973	144,3 Mio.	308 Mio.
1972	149,8 Mio.	295 Mio.
1971	161,4 Mio.	285 Mio.
1970	167,4 Mio.	277 Mio.
1969	180,6 Mio.	280 Mio.
1968	180,4 Mio.	268 Mio.
1967	215,6 Mio.	282 Mio.
1966	257,1 Mio.	301 Mio.
1965	294,0 Mio.	313 Mio.
1964	320,4 Mio.	318 Mio.
1963	366,0 Mio.	324 Mio.
1962	442,9 Mio.	363 Mio
1961	516,9 Mio.	398 Mio.
1960	604,8 Mio.	445 Mio.
1959	671,0 Mio.	473 Mio.
1958	750,0 Mio.	518 Mio.
1957	801,0 Mio.	518 Mio.
1956	817,5 Mio.	489 Mio.
1955	766,1 Mio.	443 Mio.
1954	735,6 Mio	406 Mio.
1953	680,2 Mio.	355 Mio.
1952	614,5 Mio.	308 Mio.
1951	554,8 Mio.	264 Mio.
1950	487,4 Mio.	222 Mio.

1950 it went upwards, the worst of the war aftermaths was done

 

1956 = 817.5m admissions, the highest recorded after the war

 

~ 1960 television started here to have an impact, 10 years after the first station opened people bought in high numbers TV (prices got more reasonable, people were back from earning to survive / rebuild to actually having some spending money). Cinema admissions down down down, beside the population increased and the people earn enough spending money for a cinema. But also for computers, consoles, games, smartphones, home theatres, music, travelling, high quality food, 3rd car for a family,....

 

'80/'90 home video starts to have an impact (VHS developed in 1976 in Japan)

 

Population increased from ~ 64m after the war to ~ 72m in 1960

Today its ~ 83m.

 

Last year was still a bad year....

 

Only to show why a sole 'but the population increased!' argument is not making a lot of sense.

 

 

I am getting so tired of those 'need to find anything to bring not needed comparisons' into a movies OS thread

 

 

 

 

[Tag 2]

3 hours ago, salvador-232 said:

Then why Chile went from 75 million admission in 1967 (with a population of 9 million) to 28m admission in 2018 (with a population of 18m)? And then why the number of cinemas in the center of the capital went from 37 in the 60's to just one today ? 

 

Is almost as there are different factors behind admissions than just population increase.

I think to compare different time movie, the best way to see them in their own time to get the list of which, as an example, the Titanic to break a UK box office record, in the UK box office ,007 :spectre is higher than the Titanic, but spectre only rank third place in Uk, so the Titanic is more popular in the UK;In China, the Titanic broke down China's box office record, Decetive China town(our local film) at the box office in China is higher ten times than the Titanic, but Decetive China town only take third place in China, so I can feel the Titanic is more popular.

Titanic break at least 57 markets box office record at 1998.

[Tag 2]

10 minutes ago, terrestrial said:

Maybe for some here of interest...

 

In Germany we us comma and dots in the opposite way as in the US

1950 it went upwards, the worst of the war aftermaths was done

 

1956 = 817.5m admissions, the highest recorded after the war

 

~ 1960 television started here to have an impact, 10 years after the first station opened people bought in high numbers TV (prices got more reasonable, people were back from earning to survive / rebuild to actually having some spending money). Cinema admissions down down down, beside the population increased and the people earn enough spending money for a cinema. But also for computers, consoles, games, smartphones, home theatres, music, travelling, high quality food, 3rd car for a family,....

 

'80/'90 home video starts to have an impact (VHS developed in 1976 in Japan)

 

Population increased from ~ 64m after the war to ~ 72m in 1960

Today its ~ 83m.

 

Last year was still a bad year....

 

Only to show why a sole 'but the population increased!' argument is not making a lot of sense.

 

 

I am getting so tired of those 'need to find anything to bring not needed comparisons' into a movies OS thread

 

 

 

 

I think to compare different time movie, the best way to see them in their own time to get the list of which, as an example, the Titanic to break a UK box office record, in the UK box office ,007 :spectre is higher than the Titanic, but spectre only rank third place in Uk, so the Titanic is more popular in the UK;In China, the Titanic broke down China's box office record, Decetive China town(our local film) at the box office in China is higher ten times than the Titanic, but Decetive China town only take third place in China, so I can feel the Titanic is more popular.

Titanic break at least 57 markets box office record at 1998.

 

Edited July 31, 2019 by Tag 2

[Doctor Stark]

I can’t tell if this is another Shivampa alt, or if it is JamesCameronScholar pretending to speak in broken English again.

Edited July 31, 2019 by Doctor Stark

[Tag 2]

2 hours ago, Nero said:

Population growth in India is at 1.5% now compared to 1960-70 it was 3%. So the population did increase but it wasn't much. Also movies in 20th century used to stay in theatres for more than 2-3 years and used to gross less but admission were high. Now movies don't last more than 2-3 months in theatres and also they gross more but admissions are way too low. So End game can be called as blockbuster movie in India whereas Titanic was just hit movie...

I have a India friend on Quora,he told me Titanic is really popular in India,everybody in India see that movie at 1998,and he look it in 5 times.

Titanic break Hollywood record in India,EG did it too,so they are both popular,Titanic was called Blockbuster in india,too.

[infamous5445]

4 minutes ago, Tag 2 said:

I have a India friend on Quora,he told me Titanic is really popular in India,everybody in India see that movie at 1998,and he look it in 5 times.

Titanic break Hollywood record in India,EG did it too,so they are both popular,Titanic was called Blockbuster in india,too.

No one is saying Titanic wasn't popular. What are you even arguing about at this point?

[terrestrial]

4 minutes ago, Tag 2 said:

I think to compare different time movie, the best way to see them in their own time to get the list of which, as an example, the Titanic to break a UK box office record, in the UK box office ,007 :spectre is higher than the Titanic, but spectre only rank third place in Uk, so the Titanic is more popular in the UK;In China, the Titanic broke down China's box office record, Decetive China town(our local film) at the box office in China is higher ten times than the Titanic, but Decetive China town only take third place in China, so I can feel the Titanic is more popular.

Titanic break at least 57 markets box office record at 1998.

 

there is no need to repost the same to different members. It was another time, too many details varied since then, it makes no sense at all to compare in such a way (in my POV it makes no sense to compare at all)

 

It would have been nice if you'd read my last sentence.

 

Maybe this helps:

This is not the Titanic thread, we all here know what Titanic managed (and other movies), we all are very aware about how a lot of details play into how to perceive certain details.

All of them got repeated here for at least ~ a hundred times (it feels like way more)

 

I can understand to a degree the wish to look into where another movie is still higher placed or whatever, especially around the time a record gets achieved (or nearly achieved), but the record is down, all is said, its done.

 

Lets get back to AEGs OS / ww BO! 

If details arise I am very interested into HV, digital... details worldwide, even merchandising.

After so many OT here, so many derailments... its enough in my POV. Like since a way too long time.

 

I gave the chart only to show why the sole population argument should get buried, like now and forever.

 

[Doctor Stark]

20 minutes ago, terrestrial said:

but the record is down, all is said, its done.

The record is done. It always will be. It is... inevitable.

[Tag 2]

18 minutes ago, terrestrial said:

there is no need to repost the same to different members. It was another time, too many details varied since then, it makes no sense at all to compare in such a way (in my POV it makes no sense to compare at all)

 

It would have been nice if you'd read my last sentence.

 

Maybe this helps:

This is not the Titanic thread, we all here know what Titanic managed (and other movies), we all are very aware about how a lot of details play into how to perceive certain details.

All of them got repeated here for at least ~ a hundred times (it feels like way more)

 

I can understand to a degree the wish to look into where another movie is still higher placed or whatever, especially around the time a record gets achieved (or nearly achieved), but the record is down, all is said, its done.

 

Lets get back to AEGs OS / ww BO! 

If details arise I am very interested into HV, digital... details worldwide, even merchandising.

After so many OT here, so many derailments... its enough in my POV. Like since a way too long time.

 

I gave the chart only to show why the sole population argument should get buried, like now and forever.

 

Yes,you got me,Titanic creat so many record in 1998,but somebody in this thread send a message:Just like Titanic isn't creat a record.A people in this thread told me Titanic is just a hit movie in India,but he don't know Titanic is really popular in India, it be called Blockbuster in india.

 

[Nero]

1 hour ago, Tag 2 said:

You are wrong,acorrding to india offical box office website,eight Hollywood movie was be called Blockbuster in India:Jurassic Park,Titanic spiderman3,2012,Furious7,The Jungle book, Avengers Infinity War,and EG.

You only consider about some movie on screen in more and more time,you forget the number of screen are increase ,and number of cinema.

Look at it like this : Sholay movie 250M admission. Hum apke he kaun, DDLJ - 150M+ admission. In that era Titanic 20M admission. Now at present Dangal 45M admission, Tiger Zinda Hai -40 M admission. Endgame - 20M+ admission. Judge for yourself

[terrestrial]

I hope the next time any movie nears any record-holder we will get an own xxx-movie appreciation thread, so there the people who feel the need to derail a movie's thread can celebrate their focus.

Not like fandom wars in dom, but more short-lived (like packed away a few months after 'something' happened) and definitive with good manners.

 

[Tag 2]

1 hour ago, Nero said:

Look at it like this : Sholay movie 250M admission. Hum apke he kaun,0 DDLJ - 150M+ admission. In that era Titanic 20M admission. Now at present Dangal 45M admission, Tiger Zinda Hai -40 M admission. Endgame - 20M+ admission. Judge for yourself

You should compare 90s movie,sholay is 70's movie,total different era.Hum Aqake Hai koun has 74m admission,which is highest 90's movie in india ,Titanic 20m,B2 has 120m admission  in india, which is highest 10's movie in india EG 20m,judge yourself

[ZeeSoh]

FFS its like you people have no self control whatsoever. An obvious alt or a movie fanatic comes in here and derails the thread and you people are all too happy to indulge in off topic back and forth arguments that has happened for fucking forever and that leads nowhere, instead of doing the right thing and ignore the trolls and report them for derailing. 

[Tag 2]

On 7/29/2019 at 11:15 PM, Charlie Jatinder said:

Admissions of Avatar were less than half of Titanic in India. Endgame beat Titanic admissions here. 

 

Same in case of Brazil.

I found some data,before Titanic,highest grossing film in Brazil only gross R15m,when Titanic release in Brazil,it break Brazil box offoce record and gross R75m,so Titanic definitely more popular in Brazil.

And worldwide,Titanic break 57 markets box office record,and beat Hollywood film record in india.

EG beat 18 markets box office record.

[JimiQ]

so what's the final estimated tally? 2796?

[aabattery]

@Tag 2 has been threadbanned for two weeks.

 

As a reminder, this is the Endgame thread. Keep the discussion of other stuff to the relevant threads.

 

Also don't repeat the same post, once is enough.

[terrestrial]

15 minutes ago, ZeeSoh said:

FFS its like you people have no self control whatsoever. An obvious alt or a movie fanatic comes in here and derails the thread and you people are all too happy to indulge in off topic back and forth arguments that has happened for fucking forever and that leads nowhere, instead of doing the right thing and ignore the trolls and report them for derailing. 

You are right , ignore is my friend, thx for the reminder!

[terrestrial]

6 minutes ago, aabattery said:

- snip -

just out of curiousity: who is that on your avatar picture?