Jump to content

sfran43

Weekend Thread: Hunter Killer - $420K preview

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, DAJK said:

Just imagine if Johnny English makes something like 100M in China. 

Universal would park a truck outside Rowan Atkinson's house to persuade him to make another one. 

 

Smallfoot is on course to outgross Storks both domestically and OS, $200m WW looks likely which after Ninjago and Storks is a boost in confidence for WAG. ASIB is just doing great business all round, 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites







Venom did 17.3 weekend os. 321.1 os cume and 508.4 ww.

21.6 more dom (2x the weekend) and 34.6 more current os (2x) gives 56.2 more for ~565 ww.

Japan should add 15 more and China 85 more for 665 ww. 700 is defn alive.

  • Astonished 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jiffy said:

I saw this pointed out on another forum and was wondering if anybody here knew the answer -- what was the last movie (before ASIB) to be #2 four weekends in a row?

 

3 hours ago, La Binoche said:

 

Sister Act was the last movie to be #2 for 4 weekends in a row without hitting the top spot (similar to ASIB)

 

Rush Hour 2 was the last movie to be #2 for 4 weekends in a row after debuting at #1. Patch Adams did the same a few years before RH2

Edited by BobDole
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Smallfoot had a great 17+ os weekend.

Quote

Warner Bros’ Smallfoot is another film closing in on $100M internationally with a $17.3M weekend in 78 markets. The drop was a slight 8% in holdover hubs for a total to date of $95M. There are school holidays in many offshore plays and the top opener this session was Russia with $3.6M (including sneaks) on 2,509 screens for No. 1. The yeti movie came in above nearly all comps, besting Mr Peabody And Shermanby 2%, The Emoji Movie by 16%, Captain Underpants by 38%, The Lorax by 54% and Storks by 57%.

 

In holds, China dipped just 12% from the opening weekend and has cumed $7.8M. France’s sophomore session was worth $2.8M on 545 to rank No. 2 behind the debut of Le Grand Bain (a sort of Full Monty à la française which is hitting a chord locally, taking $7.8M). The French cume on Smallfoot is $5.5M.

The UK saw an increase of 5% and has taken in $10M to date. Germany likewise bumped up, by 4%, to cume $2.5M.

I think it could do 140 os and along with 85 dom gets to a strong 225 ww (2.8x the 80 prod budget).

 

If the breakdown is

85 dom + 125 os-china + 15 china = 225,

it gets theatrical revenue of 

85*0.55+125*0.35+15*0.25 = ~94

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



next weekend:

 

33.0 - Bohemian Rapsody - 
27.0 - Nutcracker - 
12.0 - Nobody's Fool -
 
-50% Halloween - 16.0 - 154.7
-36% Star is Born - 9.0 - 164.0
-44% Venom - 6.1 - 196.0
-48% Goosebumps - 3.9 - 43.9
-49% Hunter Killer - 3.4 - 12.1
-33% Hate U Give - 3.4 - 23.4
-47% First Man - 2.6 - 42.1
-50% Smallfoot - 2.4 - 76.0
+1100% Suspiria - 2.2 - 2.5
-60% Night School - 1.3 - 73.8

-55% Mid90s - 1.3 - 5.3
-44% Old Man & the Gun - 1.0 - 9.2
+33% Beautiful Boy - 0.8 - 2.4
-50% Indivisible - 0.8 - 2.8
-50% Johnny English - 0.8 - 2.9
-79% Bad Times - 0.3 - 17.5
-71% House/Clock - 0.3 - 67.0
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





Quote

 

Not even a star-studded cast could save “London Fields” from pushing daisies at the box office.

 

The long-delayed mystery drama — starring Amber Heard, Billy Bob Thornton, Jim Sturgess, Johnny Depp, and Cara Delevingne — brought in a dismal $116,470 when it opened in 613 North American theaters. That means each venue sold just $190 worth of tickets. In other words, it was the second worst debut in recent history for a wide release (classified as any movie playing on over 600 screens) behind just “Proud American,” which launched with $96,076 in 2008, according to Box Office Mojo.

 

https://variety.com/2018/film/box-office/amber-heard-london-fields-worst-box-office-debut-1203007047/

 

This movie was made in 2013. Ouch.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





3 minutes ago, filmlover said:

I have not even heard of this movie till now. At this point, you should cut your loses and put it on Netflix.

Edited by ScoobyDoo21
Link to comment
Share on other sites







2 minutes ago, ScoobyDoo21 said:

I have not even heard of this movie till now. At this point, you should cut your loses and put it on Netflix.

They were so much suing case going on with people wanting to bury the movie, that I doubt Netflix was interested into buying it and get that controversy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites







  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.