SpiderByte Posted November 2, 2023 Share Posted November 2, 2023 I can't imagine how they even would, Doom reportedly isn't in Fantastic Four, for literally the first time in the history of that franchise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porthos Posted November 2, 2023 Share Posted November 2, 2023 (edited) 6 hours ago, SpiderByte said: 8 billion for Disney is almost nothing though. In September they announced 60 billion for the Parks. 8 for full control of Hulu is honestly a steal, id have guessed at least 10. It's not gonna be 8b as the absolute lowest is 8.6b. Likely gonna be closer to or over 9b when all is said and done, even after accounting for the offset/dues/back payment that @Potiki mentioned. 6 hours ago, Jonwo said: It was rumoured to be high as $26bn. No no no, that's confusing overall value of Hulu with how much Disney needs to pay for the 33% share!!! Ain't no one out there who thinks Hulu is worth $78b! 😉 Edited November 2, 2023 by Porthos 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MovieMan89 Posted November 2, 2023 Share Posted November 2, 2023 4 hours ago, WittyUsername said: They’ve obviously shown a questionable track record at best, but MyTimeToShine is claiming that Marvel does not in fact plan on replacing Kang with Dr. Doom. There is no “righting” the Kang ship at this point. It doesn’t even matter if Majors were to have a full recovery with the public, people don’t care about the character. Move on from that anchor or watch it sink the franchise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderByte Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 1 hour ago, MovieMan89 said: There is no “righting” the Kang ship at this point. It doesn’t even matter if Majors were to have a full recovery with the public, people don’t care about the character. Move on from that anchor or watch it sink the franchise. I don't really think just suddenly pivoting to Doom fixes those problems. Recasting Majors fixes any real issues with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic Draper Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 (edited) https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/streaming-tv-ratings-oct-2-8-2023-1235635865/ Big drop from the first season Edited November 3, 2023 by Dominic Draper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porthos Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 4 minutes ago, Dominic Draper said: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/streaming-tv-ratings-oct-2-8-2023-1235635865/ Big drop from the first season As I mentioned in the Streaming Tracking thread, it's not strictly apples-to-apples given Loki S1 had an extra day-and-two-thirds to rack up more views (dropping at 12am Pacific on Wed vs 6pm Pacific Thr). Then again, as the article does note, that Nielsen figure also includes any and all S1 "catch up" viewing, so it cuts both ways. Was there a drop off? Absolutely. Do we know how much? Not to the precision THR and others are claiming. Was it quite a bit? Oh yes. Yes, indeed. Will we know more by this time next week? Yep. (is this yet another reason why the guilds have been fighting tooth and nail for streaming numbers in their contract fights??? DING DING DING DING) 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arlborn Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, Porthos said: As I mentioned in the Streaming Tracking thread, it's not strictly apples-to-apples given Loki S1 had an extra day-and-two-thirds to rack up more views (dropping at 12am Pacific on Wed vs 6pm Pacific Thr). Then again, as the article does note, that Nielsen figure also includes any and all S1 "catch up" viewing, so it cuts both ways. Was there a drop off? Absolutely. Do we know how much? Not to the precision THR and others are claiming. Was it quite a bit? Oh yes. Yes, indeed. Will we know more by this time next week? Yep. (is this yet another reason why the guilds have been fighting tooth and nail for streaming numbers in their contract fights??? DING DING DING DING) Great context for numbers as usual Porthos, lovely to have you around. The funny thing about whatever the drop off ends up being is that this season is even more enjoyable than the first one for me and anyone else I personally talked to about it. Quantumania plus Majors effect in action? Maybe some people just don’t wanna see more of Kang, at all. Repeat with me for the 69th time guys: They really need to kill Kang off in Loki. Edited November 3, 2023 by Arlborn 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderByte Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 It's worth noting season 1 was, and I believe still is (not accounting for multiple episodes releases) the biggest premiere they've had, so even a dip is still a successful show for the platform. Echos trailer is reportedly tomorrow, which I'm sure won't be at all bombarded with idiots after the dumbass South Park thing about diversity where everyone thinks Cartman is apparently the character the authors use as the voice of reason and not the guy they use for all the shit they think is stupid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porthos Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 10 minutes ago, Arlborn said: Quantumania plus Majors effect in action? Maybe some people just don’t wanna see more of Kang, at all. Whoooo, boy. I dunno. I'm leery of over-analyzing 3.5 days of data as if I had done that for The Mandalorian S3 even after a couple of weeks of data, I would have looked pretty damn silly as while it never quite got the insane levels of week-to-week pure viewership of Mando S2, it more or less held its audience as the season went on: Here is the Mando time charts I have: Mando Min View (Weekly) Min Added (Weekly) Min View (Total) Minutes (Total) Views (Total) Season 1 5420m* 315 5420m 315 17.21m S2 Week 1 1032m 52 6452m 367 17.58m S2 Week 2 955m 40 7407m 407 18.20m S2 Week 3 873m 35 8280m 442 18.73m S2 Week 4 939m 37 9219m 479 19.25m S2 Week 5 1210m 45 10429m 524 19.90m S2 Week 6 994m 32 11423m 556 20.54m S2 Week 7 1042m 38 12465m 594 20.98m S2 Week 8 1336m 44 13801m 638 21.63m S2 Week 9 1024m — 14825m 638 23.24m S2 Week 10 707m — 15532m 638 24.34m S2 Week 11 441m — 15973m 638 25.04m S2 Week 12 339m — 16312m 638 25.57m S3 Week -1 213m* — 16525m 638 25.90m S3 Week 1 823m 35 17348m 673 25.78m S3 Week 2 889m 42 18237m 715 25.51m S3 Week 3 1115m 56 19352m 771 25.10m S3 Week 4 795m 31 20147m 802 25.12m S3 Week 5 878m 41 21025m 843 24.94m S3 Week 6 1031m 45 22056m 888 24.84m S3 Week 7 1025m 51 23081m 939 24.58m S3 Week 8 1012m 39 24093m 978 24.63m S3 Week 9 498m — 24591m 978 25.14m S3 Week 10 319m — 24910m 978 25.47m S3 Week 11 242m — 25152m 978 25.72m S3 Week 12 205m — 25357m 978 25.93m Now the whole idea of "Total Views" (ie presuming 1 person watches THE ENTIRE CATALOGUE OF A SERIES exactly once) is highly highly flawed, but it's probably the least flawed measurement we peons can come up with until Nielsen (or someone else) graces us with something better. Anyway, if you look at S3 it started with about 21m to 23m views per week if folks were only watching the new episode that week, which was down from the cumulative total view of 25m-ish viewers. That's about a 10% drop, right??? Except... Except as the season went on, viewership went back up. Take S3 Week 4. That looks 795m looks bad right? Except if it was only folks watching that episode that week (and again it isn't but roll with me), that'd be 25.6m views that week! Then there is the Nielsen data that we have after the season was over as folks were catching up (or rewatching favs). When all was said and done, the "Total Views" of all of The Mandalorian got back to more or less where it was at the beginning of the season. And one might also note how strong Mando was post S2-finale as something of a compare/contrast (though AGAIN timing comes into play as Mando S2 had a midnight Fri release pattern vs Mando S3 Wed midnight release pattern) Does this mean there was no drop off in viewership after all? That it just took time for folks to catch up? Almost certainly not, as S2 was just a juggernaut some weeks (S2 Week 7, for instance would have been 27.4m views if everyone was just watching the new episode). But was it as much of a drop as it might have seemed at the beginning? Especially from those initial press reports which made the rounds? Again, no, almost certainly not. Thus I am... hesitant to over-interpret at this point in time. 🙂 ===== Now this does look to be a much larger drop off for Loki I have to say. But all I really am saying is we probably need more numbers before we can really comment. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderByte Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 Oh my God do we seriously need tracking for Nielsen ratings too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porthos Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 10 minutes ago, SpiderByte said: Oh my God do we seriously need tracking for Nielsen ratings too Yes? We've been doing it for a long time in the Streaming section. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MovieMan89 Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 Loki season 1 was still during covid streaming days, so it would be surprising if this didn’t drop big. Not really a fair benchmark this time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 9 hours ago, WittyUsername said: They’ve obviously shown a questionable track record at best, but MyTimeToShine is claiming that Marvel does not in fact plan on replacing Kang with Dr. Doom. once The Marvels becomes one of the biggest bombs of all time, all bets are off Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderByte Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 9 minutes ago, John Marston said: once The Marvels becomes one of the biggest bombs of all time, all bets are off You do realize that Blue Beetle, which made way less money than every other DC release this year, is the only one who's coming back right? So no, they are probably not pivoting all their plans on a dime next week. Jeesh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Train Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 11 hours ago, SpiderByte said: You do realize that Blue Beetle, which made way less money than every other DC release this year, is the only one who's coming back right? So no, they are probably not pivoting all their plans on a dime next week. Jeesh. I will believe it when I see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderByte Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 Deadpool just got beat to being Marvels first R rated release. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Reynolds Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 Hulu getting too , maybe due to strikes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderByte Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 2 minutes ago, Ryan Reynolds said: Hulu getting too , maybe due to strikes Could be, could be concern over content ratings, or just synergy now that Disneys about to own ALL of Hulu. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderByte Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 Even if it's timed, emphasizing the Hulu availability definitely makes me think theyre teeing up combining both services together in some way, or at least the same app. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liiviig 1998 Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 Color me surprised. This looks good. Whether that pans out into a good show will see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...