Jump to content

Fancyarcher

Wednesday Actuals: Nolan - 3.4, BH6 - 1.8M

Recommended Posts

If it wasn't for Nolan we would be talking about what right now?

BH6 numbers?

Please.

 

BH6 numbers are more relevant to the topic of the thread (listed above as Wed Actuals) than random talk about Interstellar fans because that'd actually be talking about the numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





The problem with that is that later movies that were huge...like Star Wars and ET would have not been nearly as big because it would not have the same impact.

Not to mention that today we would still look back at the 70s and say the exact same thing. "Yeah...those CGI effects looked brand new back then, but today's immersive 3D environment movies would really make everyone in the 70s speechless!"

No matter what you do, every movie exists in its own time. The "impressive" movies of today will be quaint decades from now. We may be seeing the "been there done that" effect with the Hobbit movies. Is that what LOTR would make today?

I agree that each movie belongs in their own decade. Different times means movie were made to tailor different moods of the years. Some movies today that are huge would flop back then and vice versa. Adjusted numbers shows how popular a movie was at the time, not how popular it would be today.

In regards to LOTR I still think it would gross near the same amount if released today, it's well on its way to classic status and the effects are still pretty damn good. The reason Hobbit is fading is because they stretched 1 book with not nearly enough material into 3 movies and when they first came out everyone wanted a continuation of LOTR, which it was not.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites



I don't think there's an easy way to track old releases, short of getting your hands on corporate data from the time (any numbers announced to the public back then were domestic rentals only, not actual grosses). In the vast majority of cases, though (Disney perhaps excepted), I'd wager that a majority of the money came from the first-run release.

In a nutshell yep

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Yeah but the runs were much more longer, no ?

 

Yes, but they also didn't open up in 3,000+ theaters on 10,000+ screens

 

Look at Jaws first 6 weeks. It's widest release was 675 theaters on it's way to $260m dom unadjusted.

 

 

1975

Date

(click to view chart)

Rank Weekend

Gross

%

Change

Theaters Change / Avg. Gross-to-Date Week

#

Jun 20–22 1 $7,061,513 - 409 - $17,265 $7,061,513 1
Jun 27–29 1 $6,810,584 -3.6% 409 - $16,652 $21,116,354 2
Jul 4–6 1 $6,443,138 -5.4% 409 - $15,753 $36,954,111 3
Jul 11–13 1 $5,954,787 -7.6% 464 +55 $12,833 $49,516,476 4
Jul 25–27 1 $6,150,000 - 675 - $9,111 $69,725,376 6
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites























  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.