Jump to content

kayumanggi

Mission: Impossible - Fallout | July 27 2018 | Paramount | Reactions coming in | "Best action movie since Fury Road"

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, AndyK said:

Well, there's a lot of positive comments about the stunts and not a lot about the story.

 

Reminds of the BR2049 reviews where ereryone talked about the visuals and not much else.

 

Dont expect reviewers who liked CMBYN to overly enjoy this type of movie.

It's not like CMBYN had an intricate plot. 

 

The plot in these movies doesn't matter. I feel like 4 or 5 of these MI movies are about Ethan going rogue after his own agency turns on him lol. It just needs to string together enough sense to get from one crazy set piece to the next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 minute ago, Rebeccas said:

It's not like CMBYN had an intricate plot. 

 

The plot in these movies doesn't matter. I feel like 4 or 5 of these MI movies are about Ethan going rogue after his own agency turns on him lol. It just needs to string together enough sense to get from one crazy set piece to the next.

Yeah, I'm just saying, some reviewers don't give great marks to this type of movie, cos they are snobs basically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



15 minutes ago, Rebeccas said:

How much does Tom make for these movies? I feel like it should be a lot.

Had the time it was one of the biggest contract ever (getting a rare for the time 100% video clause), making it possible to make 100m on a movie

https://weminoredinfilm.com/2015/08/03/why-paramount-walked-away-from-tom-cruise-in-2006/

 

Apparently on the third one, seeing how much more Cruise was making than the studio it changed apparently, but it must be still the nice back end deal.

 

The rumors (or maybe he got known since) for MI 2 was:

For Mission Impossible 2, Cruise’s cut of the theatrical gross increased to 30% and he also got 12% of the total video/DVD receipts with no expenses deducted by Paramount.

 

That is quite impressive, normally the point you get on home video is on 20% of the home ent gross, getting 12% of 100% of the revenues and around that era when dvd got extremely huge, was quite a lot.

Edited by Barnack
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



8 minutes ago, HesAPooka said:

His blurb make it seem like his problem is cruise and not the movie. Shouldn't review movies professionally if you can't put personal feelings aside

 

Movie reviews are inherently personal. Critics aren't robots; it's hard to critically evaluate a movie without having actual, personal opinions on the subject.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



4 minutes ago, aabattery said:

 

Movie reviews are inherently personal. Critics aren't robots; it's hard to critically evaluate a movie without having actual, personal opinions on the subject.

Have to disagree, It's no different than being a judge at the Olympics or a referee at the world cup. You put personal feelings aside and judge without biases, that's the job

 

 

 

xOQ6nGr.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Tom Cruise 's biggest movie since Oprah is MI4 with 240 adjusted.

His three biggest movies post Oprah and War of the Worlds Scientology heavy press tour are his three  Mission Impossible movies.

When he s not Ethan Hawke, he sttruggles to pass the 100m mark.

 

So 250m should be seen as the best MI6 can do.

 

300m would be really huge.

Edited by The Futurist
Link to comment
Share on other sites





4 minutes ago, HesAPooka said:

Have to disagree, It's no different than being a judge at the Olympics or a referee at the world cup. You put personal feelings aside and judge without biases, that's the job

 

 

 

xOQ6nGr.gif

 

That...sounds like a terrible way to watch movies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



3 minutes ago, HesAPooka said:

Have to disagree, It's no different than being a judge at the Olympics or a referee at the world cup. You put personal feelings aside and judge without biases, that's the job

 

 

 

xOQ6nGr.gif

 

A movie review is a lot what did you personally feel when judging it and is impossible to not take them into account nor would most of your reader you developed a relation with would want you to do.

 

Referring a world cup is quite different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





3 minutes ago, HesAPooka said:

Have to disagree, It's no different than being a judge at the Olympics or a referee at the world cup. You put personal feelings aside and judge without biases, that's the job

 

 

 

xOQ6nGr.gif

 

I think there's a big difference between judging a sport (where there are set rules and guidelines) and critiquing films, which are always gonna fall to subjective tastes and preferences. There's no such thing as objectivity in art.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites





Just now, HesAPooka said:

judging a movie based on merit and not personal feelings about the actor involved?

Obviously not with personal feeling about the actor involved even too it is impossible for an human to know and really control any of that, but personnal feeling about the movie you just watched yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.