Maxmoser3 Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 It was at 38%, now it's 52%. Not horrible but not great but a lot better than Snatched or Baywatch 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxmoser3 Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 RT update: its score is on-par with Bad Moms and is at 57% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxmoser3 Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 RT update: its score is on-par with Bad Moms and is at 57% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blankments Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 Updated predicts: OW: 21M DOM: 74M WW: 101M Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 On 2017-3-9 at 2:39 PM, baumer said: 100 mill for sure. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 So if the reviews for this were decent, why did it tank so miserably? I mean, this is going to what I though Hangover would do when I made the Hangover under Very Bad Things adjusted (18 mill). Ok, it might do more than that, but still, a disaster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franfar Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 On 4/25/2017 at 8:52 PM, franfar said: I re-watched the trailer for this, and it just looks like an extended SNL sketch. Not much chemistry between the actors at all, generic, a bunch of shit slapped together, etc. I think it could get some laughs, but I don't think this will be another Bad Moms scenario. But who knows, maybe I'm wrong. I just feel like it would've had more success a decade ago. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franfar Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 3 minutes ago, baumer said: So if the reviews for this were decent, why did it tank so miserably? I mean, this is going to what I though Hangover would do when I made the Hangover under Very Bad Things adjusted (18 mill). Ok, it might do more than that, but still, a disaster. Reviews are decent? It's mixed for critics and audiences. Average ratings are mediocre. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 3 hours ago, franfar said: Reviews are decent? It's mixed for critics and audiences. Average ratings are mediocre. I'm just going by what people said here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwoMisfits Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 (edited) 12 minutes ago, baumer said: So if the reviews for this were decent, why did it tank so miserably? I mean, this is going to what I though Hangover would do when I made the Hangover under Very Bad Things adjusted (18 mill). Ok, it might do more than that, but still, a disaster. If I had to guess... 1. Less appealing premise to women...(from the trailer, so not a spoiler - I haven't seen this) killing someone in a raunchy night and then covering it up in some way is not something they'd see themselves doing...ever...if you can't ever imagine the scenario, its humor is limited... 2. Bad weekend for release...I mean, Father's Day? The weekend moms and daughters are spending making their dads happy? Plus, the problem of the WW juggernaut made this choice worse... 3. Unlikeable and unidentifiable characters (which goes along with premise)...the previews didn't have a character you'd "root for" or "you'd see yourself as"...Bad Moms trailers gave you a "hero" and a "villain" in the trailers and gave you characters that you'd say "that's me" or "I totally know that person"...the best comedies have a small ring of truth in them...who in this movie is someone who people would say "yeah, I know that person"... I originally liked the 1st trailer...then I saw a few more and was totally turned off by the premise and characters...and I was probably in the original "planned demo" for this... I don't see a 5x for this...so it won't be Bad Moms...it will still probably get comedy legs, so it won't totally crash and burn... Edited June 17, 2017 by TwoMisfits 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmlover Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 7 minutes ago, baumer said: So if the reviews for this were decent, why did it tank so miserably? I mean, this is going to what I though Hangover would do when I made the Hangover under Very Bad Things adjusted (18 mill). Ok, it might do more than that, but still, a disaster. The plot probably just came across as too dark and mean-spirited. A murder (and the ensuing disposal of the body) isn't exactly an ideal fun girls night out. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franfar Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 (edited) 5 minutes ago, baumer said: I'm just going by what people said here. Based on what I see in this thread, they jumped on the early reviews as usual, before the overall % dropped. Edited June 17, 2017 by franfar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zakiyyah6 Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 This is one of those movies where I over predicted it but I completely understand why it failed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingp0va Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 People are so turned off by scarlett's hair, I'm completely sure this could have done better if she had long hair Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 3 hours ago, Kingp0va said: People are so turned off by scarlett's hair, I'm completely sure this could have done better if she had long hair You know, as funny as this sounds, I get it. She just doesn't look right in this film. It also doesn't help that there is a bunch of relatively unknown people in the cast. There's one surprise cameo and that doesn't really do anything to the plot either. I just felt that this was off in so many places. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezen Baklattan Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 On 4/29/2017 at 11:26 AM, filmlover said: Spoiler speculation: Hide contents I think the guy who they accidentally kill is really a criminal who tried to break into their home and Colton Haynes (who is seen in the trailer wearing a police uniform- a much more obvious male stripper costume- and then shirtless later) is the real stripper. Yup, that's exactly what happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjones1325 Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 If you know me, you might know that one of my favorite shows on TV right now is Broad City. It all started in 2014 when I met this girl named Cosette who was part of a Tribeca film program we attended for the summer. One day she was out shooting a small little scene Broad City and like the supportive friend I was, I eager to see her on TV. Somehow I found myself getting addicted to the show and not just because of my friend. So when word got out that in 2015 a screenplay written by Paul W. Downs and Lucia Aniello ended up on the blacklist on unproduced screenplays, I was eager to see it become a reality. Rough Night was undoubtedly one of my most anticipated movies to see this year and I don’t get anticipated for movies anymore. https://rendyreviews.com/movies//rough-night-review Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krissykins Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 8 hours ago, baumer said: You know, as funny as this sounds, I get it. She just doesn't look right in this film. It also doesn't help that there is a bunch of relatively unknown people in the cast. There's one surprise cameo and that doesn't really do anything to the plot either. I just felt that this was off in so many places. Meh. Considering how big SNL was this last season I'd say Kate McKinnon isn't "unknown" anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 3 hours ago, Krissykins said: Meh. Considering how big SNL was this last season I'd say Kate McKinnon isn't "unknown" anymore. So two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 I wonder what genius thought it would be good to release this on Father's Day weekend? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
