shayhiri Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Hmm, Dubai is just a short budget flight from my place - shall I go there see it, juts to rub it in your Lawtard noses? Dubai was on my list anyway. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kowhite Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 3 hours ago, shayhiri said: Hmm, Dubai is just a short budget flight from my place - shall I go there see it, juts to rub it in your Lawtard noses? Dubai was on my list anyway. I can think of reasons not to go to Dubai... But this isn't one of them! Don't like...ok, I'm not going to finish this sentence... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennaJ Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 DIFF is in December, a short time before the movie is due for release, so by that time I assume it will probably already have press screenings etc elsewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobysaurus Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Dubai? Guess I'll be seeing this before everyone else 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A District 3 Engineer Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 I hate you but I'll love you when you give me your spoiler-free review. Anyways, looks like the media is pretty interested in that specific scene of the film, this is the second or third interview I see about it. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalo Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 3 minutes ago, A District 3 Engineer said: I hate you but I'll love you when you give me your spoiler-free review. Anyways, looks like the media is pretty interested in that specific scene of the film, this is the second or third interview I see about it. What an awkward interview, pratt didn't seem very comfortable talking about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kowhite Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 1 hour ago, Kalo said: What an awkward interview, pratt didn't seem very comfortable talking about it. Ha yeah, that interviewer was fishing for a sound bite. He didn't get it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 On 7/21/2016 at 5:54 AM, A District 3 Engineer said: Apparently, the film is debuting at Dubai film festival. Awesome. I go to Dubai all the time, it's just an hour away. I wanna see this shit. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Futurist Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 Does this movie even exist ? I am starting to have Meryl Streep doubts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kowhite Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 24 minutes ago, The Futurist said: Does this movie even exist ? I am starting to have Meryl Streep doubts. Whats...a Meryl Steep doubt? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Futurist Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 (edited) 5 minutes ago, kowhite said: Whats...a Meryl Steep doubt? From the movie, you guessed it, titled : Edited July 26, 2016 by The Futurist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klingo Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 Just now, The Futurist said: Does this movie even exist ? I am starting to have Meryl Streep doubts. Nope, since the lawsuit which is holding the company's JLaw motion capture which cannot be used in the film, its over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kowhite Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 (edited) Wait Chris Pratt molests Catholic children in this movie? Or...at least...Meryl Streep thinks he does? Wait I might be confused. Why would you cryo freeze Catholic children? Edited July 26, 2016 by kowhite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antovolk Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric is Quiet Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 14 minutes ago, antovolk said: 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayhawk the Hutt Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 So, is this finally gonna get a trailer? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennaJ Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 (edited) 2 hours ago, antovolk said: That quote is the opposite of reassuring to me - it basically says that due to the lawsuit, the movie will not feature the technology they were set on using. They basically started the process with one technology, and the finished movie will not feature any of it. a happy outcome in this case would have been if they could use the technology as intended and prepped. I dont just want the movie to come out when it's due, I want it to be as good as it can be. Being forced to abort a CGI tool well into post production is not my idea of "Won't be affected". For all we know, this may mean they got rid of the MOVA scene altogether or altered it greatly. Edited July 27, 2016 by JennaJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trifle Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 (edited) On 7/25/2016 at 10:25 PM, Klingo said: Nope, since the lawsuit which is holding the company's JLaw motion capture which cannot be used in the film, its over. Actually, since Sony said that that will not hold up the release, and since they since then set a December 23 opening in .... I think?.... Italy, I'm pretty sure it is going forward. I was going to post that Pratt interview. I agree he didn't look at ease, maybe because he was there for a different studio? But actors get asked about other projects all the time. I dunno. I am SO jealous of those who can see it in Dubai!! Definitely looking forward to the spoiler free reviews of everyone who doesn't hate any of the stars or is otherwise biased. And @shayhiri, that's not nice. We don't call you a 'Prince-of-Persia-tard', and that might have been a very nice movie. (Didn't see it.) 1 hour ago, JennaJ said: That quote is the opposite of reassuring to me - it basically says that due to the lawsuit, the movie will not feature the technology they were set on using. They basically started the process with one technology, and the finished movie will not feature any of it. a happy outcome in this case would have been if they could use the technology as intended and prepped. I dont just want the movie to come out when it's due, I want it to be as good as it can be. Being forced to abort a CGI tool well into post production is not my idea of "Won't be affected". For all we know, this may mean they got rid of the MOVA scene altogether or altered it greatly. Yeah. That sucks imho. However, we don't know how key this was to the final product. I assume if it impacted the quality Sony would take a different approach. Personally, I would have confidently assumed the preliminary injunction would have been modified. I know there was a hearing to modify the injunction on docket. Last week, I think? I was traveling and didn't keep up. Edited July 27, 2016 by trifle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trifle Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 @JennaJ from the Hollywood Reporter article in your quoted text: Quote If Digital Domain still has access to MOVA-captured facial data on current work, alternate approaches may be available to complete the shots. Another article had specified that that Digital Domain had already delivered the motion-captured facial data to Sony. So they could just be using a different VFX house - not MOVA- to complete it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klingo Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 Just now, JennaJ said: That quote is the opposite of reassuring to me - it basically says that due to the lawsuit, the movie will not feature the technology they were set on using. They basically started the process with one technology, and the finished movie will not feature any of it. a happy outcome in this case would have been if they could use the technology as intended and prepped. I dont just want the movie to come out when it's due, I want it to be as good as it can be. Being forced to abort a CGI tool well into post production is not my idea of "Won't be affected". For all we know, this may mean they got rid of the MOVA scene altogether or altered it greatly. This is probably what is going to happen without the motion capture. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
