Jump to content

baumer

The Great Gatsby (2013)

  

51 members have voted

  1. 1. Grade it



Recommended Posts

A big meh. It alternated between trashy and bland. Luhrmann's need to eliminate every possible subtlety and nuance of the source material was expected but still grating. I love Moulin Rouge, but his style simply did not work for this adaptation. 

 

The acting was a very mixed bag. Some like Edgerton and Debicki really surprised me with their takes. Others like Mulligan and DiCaprio were trying their best but clearly miscast and misdirected. Then you have Tobey Maguire, who was abysmal, even Razzie-worthy. Sounded like a child reading Christmas cards. I don't know what movie those who enjoyed his performance were watching.

 

I'm not usually a stickler for faithfulness to the original source material, but some of the narrative liberties were just too much to handle. The framing device was garbage, absolute garbage. It only served to remind us that we were watching an inferior version of a story that belongs on the page. If Luhrmann's so concerned about the 'realism' of Nick's narration, why not just cut it entirely? It certainly distracted from the film anyways. Things like Jordan's lack of screen-time and Myrtle's complete irrelevance (until the very end) were also poor adaptive choices.

 

Where the film fails most, however, is when it tries WAY too hard to capture the "spirit" of the novel. Things that were subtle and inconspicuous in the written word, such as TJ Eckleburg's glasses, become obvious and condescending on screen. Adding Jay-Z and Lady Gaga music to highlight the excess of the 1920s isn't so much an inspired choice as it is a nauseatingly unsubtle and uninteresting one. Luhrmann's direction is the cinematic equivalent of telling and not showing. 

 

The film does improve considerably after the half hour mark, but it's only a step up from gaudy and insulting to bland and rushed. The moments where Luhrmann tones down the visual pomposity reveal his weaknesses in directing actors. DiCaprio and Mulligan have weak chemistry, and they, along with the rest of the cast, seem completely confused as to what they're supposed to be doing. 

 

I didn't hate it entirely. I thought the climactic confrontation was executed really well (even if it is spoiled immediately after when Myrtle's gory body flies through the air like a corpse in a slasher flick), and it made me wonder what these actors could have done with a better director. I also thought the costumes and sets were gorgeous, even if they were slightly spoiled by asinine cinematography and haphazard edits.

 

In the end, it wasn't quite as offensive as I thought it might be, but it was nowhere near as innovative or daring either.

 

C, 5/10

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Where the film fails most, however, is when it tries WAY too hard to capture the "spirit" of the novel. Things that were subtle and inconspicuous in the written word, such as TJ Eckleburg's glasses, become obvious and condescending on screen.

I know this is just a thread for the 2013 movie but earlier Gatsby adaptations feature the billboard just as heavily. The eyes are even in the trailer of the silent version. If TJ Eckleburg had been left out or minimized here it would have been just another thing someone would have complained about Luhrmann getting "wrong", I suspect.

 

I really liked Leo's performance a lot. The book makes Gatsby out to be a tragic dreamer who also got caught up in the wrong world but I could appreciate this version where he seems more delusional to the point of being a little creepy and that scared Daisy off as much as her fickleness and the impossibiliy of their situation. I look at it like Shakespeare where there's always a slightly different take on Hamlet or Lady Macbeth or King Lear.

Edited by BoxOfficeChica
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this is just a thread for the 2013 movie but earlier Gatsby adaptations feature the billboard just as heavily. The eyes are even in the trailer of the silent version. If TJ Eckleburg had been left out or minimized here it would have been just another thing someone would have complained about Luhrmann getting "wrong", I suspect.

 

You nailed it.

 

I didn't feel like Dr. T.J. Eckleburg was handled in a condescending manner in the movie - or if it was, it wasn't necessarily out-of-place; the symbolism is spelled out just as clearly in the novel.

Edited by Webslinger
Link to comment
Share on other sites





I enjoyed it somewhat. Luhrmann's directing style isn't quite my thing, but it worked here for the most part. DiCaprio gives a powerhouse performance, but Maguire comes off as awkwardly funny in a lot of scenes. Story's great, but why wouldn't it be? C+

Edited by Blankments
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost everything about this film worked for me. I thought the performances were fantastic across the board (Leo is brilliant, Mulligan is a pleasant enough surprise, and Tobey was good). Love it or hate it, Baz has such a terrifically unique sense of style, and it's radiant here. One of my favorite films of the year.

 

A

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites







I would've been way more interested in a Baz HP than a Columbus one.

I've never heard that Baz was offered HP1! That one really had to play to young kids and his style can be so polarizing, I'm surprised WB offered it to him. I always wonder if the cast, the trio would've been the same if the first HP had had a different director. Probably not and that film history "what if" is interesting to consider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites









Wow... Just wow.

Initially, when I saw that people were worried about Luhrman taking on to the project, and when I saw that the reviews weren't that favorable, I didn't think this movie would be for me so I decided to wait for a DVD release.

 

Well, I just finished watching it and, once again, I learned that I shouldn't listen to the haters.

 

I love movies that have narration and music that fits with the scenes, especially the kind of music used in this movie: the kind of energetic one, mixed together with beautiful visuals, so, as you can guess, this movie clicked with me from the moment the narration started. The surprise is honestly Tobey Maguire who has a great performance that should gain him some more attention from award winning movie directors. Leo was great, but not as great as Tobey. I also liked that other guy (Buchanan, I forgot his real name, I'm sorry) and his wife (again, name forgotten).

Overall, I enjoyed it tremendously. The last fifteen minutes of the movie were simply the best ones and earned this movie a very decent score. A/A+

 

Edit: I just looked back over a few of the reviews. The reasons stated for hating the movie are downright idiotic and has 'hater' written all over it, to be honest.

"The green screen hurt my eyes." LOL

Edited by ChD
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Wow... Just wow.

Initially, when I saw that people were worried about Luhrman taking on to the project, and when I saw that the reviews weren't that favorable, I didn't think this movie would be for me so I decided to wait for a DVD release.

 

Well, I just finished watching it and, once again, I learned that I shouldn't listen to the haters.

 

I love movies that have narration and music that fits with the scenes, especially the kind of music used in this movie: the kind of energetic one, mixed together with beautiful visuals, so, as you can guess, this movie clicked with me from the moment the narration started. The surprise is honestly Tobey Maguire who has a great performance that should gain him some more attention from award winning movie directors. Leo was great, but not as great as Tobey. I also liked that other guy (Buchanan, I forgot his real name, I'm sorry) and his wife (again, name forgotten).

Overall, I enjoyed it tremendously. The last fifteen minutes of the movie were simply the best ones and earned this movie a very decent score. A/A+

 

Edit: I just looked back over a few of the reviews. The reasons stated for hating the movie are downright idiotic and has 'hater' written all over it, to be honest.

"The green screen hurt my eyes." LOL

you're opinion is completely bias, just letting you know. There's nothing wrong with people if they didn't like this film nor is it wrong if they liked it, If anything you're opinion is the idiotic one. I said one thing in the other thread( what was with all the jayz music?) and you attacked me, basically asking for my opinion, it's almost like you wanted other people to hate it so you could flash out your narcissism and claim I am different! anyways grow up and join the real world. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



you're opinion is completely bias, just letting you know. There's nothing wrong with people if they didn't like this film nor is it wrong if they liked it, If anything you're opinion is the idiotic one. I said one thing in the other thread( what was with all the jayz music?) and you attacked me, basically asking for my opinion, it's almost like you wanted other people to hate it so you could flash out your narcissism and claim I am different! anyways grow up and join the real world. 

 

No, but that reason was stupid. You just said "That movie with the Jay Z music" ? What I got from that? The way you said it it's like that movie sucks because it has Jay Z music in it, which is an idiotic thing to say. If you would've said that I don't know, it was boring or something like that, that would've been something else, but saying that it sucked because Jay Z had music in it is just as idiotic as saying that your eyes hurt from the green screen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



i'm not trying to fight with you. but what I said was "Whats with all the jayz music?" it was question, I didn't understand why everytime I heard music it was something completely out of it's century. It just felt out of place that and when Gatsy's in the car with tobey's character and it looks like there going 100mph which those cars would not have been able to do back then, flying passed cars, I mean there's lots of stupid little bits in this movie just made it an unpleasant experience. Now if that's idiotic to you, then call me what you will. I can see how some people might like this and that's fine but I didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.