Jump to content

Noctis

Blockbusters should be nominated more

Recommended Posts







There's no segregation. Make good movies that connect with your audience in a deeply meaningful way, and you'll get recognition. If you want to be rewarded by a certain subset of that audience, make your films connect with that subset.

Actually, exactly because blockbusters make so much money it means they connect with the audience. And considering the way you can become an Academy member it's pretty clear it's a vicious circle going around. Old snobs will only pick others like them to judge.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



If a blockbuster is great enough it will get nominated with a few exceptions of course. I have no problem with the Academy not nominating one every year and even if a blockbuster I feel is great doesn't get nominated, it doesn't bother me.

Well, except ESB. It should have won best picture. :P

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites





There's no segregation. Make good movies that connect with your audience in a deeply meaningful way, and you'll get recognition. If you want to be rewarded by a certain subset of that audience, make your films connect with that subset.

 

You won't win the argument that the old geezers of AMPAS don't have a bias towards certain genres, the segregation is de facto real.

Middle Earth won because it had Tolkien s street cred behind it and I am confident that without the books, the LOTR films would have gone nowhere with AMPAS except the tech categories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



You won't win the argument that the old geezers of AMPAS don't have a bias towards certain genres, the segregation is de facto real.

Middle Earth won because it had Tolkien s street cred behind it and I am confident that without the books, the LOTR films would have gone nowhere with AMPAS except the tech categories.

 

Street cred? :rofl: The fact remains that the Academy consistently nominates movies that've done really well at the box-office, and even have done so when there were only 5 nominees. The only change is that now fanboys refuse to accept critical and/or financial success and now demand awards as well.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Street cred? :rofl: The fact remains that the Academy consistently nominates movies that've done really well at the box-office, and even have done so when there were only 5 nominees. The only change is that now fanboys refuse to accept critical and/or financial success and now demand awards as well.

Not really. There are a lot critically well received blockbusters that are completely left out because the Academy never even nominated their genre. Example: DH2 got 96% on RT, higer than King's Speech, that won BP in 2011. Truth be told, the only thing the Academy nominates are adult dramas. Like, from all the movies last year they gave BP to 12 Years A Slave. It was laughable.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Street cred? :rofl: The fact remains that the Academy consistently nominates movies that've done really well at the box-office, and even have done so when there were only 5 nominees. The only change is that now fanboys refuse to accept critical and/or financial success and now demand awards as well.

 

Why using the word fanboy as a derogatory term like that ?

AMPAS were stuttering king of england fanboys too, booh, bad AMPAS fanboys, the are more predictable than Marvel or Nolan fanboys !

Why always this need to divide people into categories ?

People like what they like and there is no need to give them a derogatory or condescending description.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Not really. There are a lot critically well received blockbusters that are completely left out because the Academy never even nominated their genre. Example: DH2 got 96% on RT, higer than King's Speech, that won BP in 2011. Truth be told, the only thing the Academy nominates are adult dramas. Like, from all the movies last year they gave BP to 12 Years A Slave. It was laughable.

 

RT% measures how many critics thought positively, not how positive they were.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites







Not really. There are a lot critically well received blockbusters that are completely left out because the Academy never even nominated their genre. Example: DH2 got 96% on RT, higer than King's Speech, that won BP in 2011. Truth be told, the only thing the Academy nominates are adult dramas. Like, from all the movies last year they gave BP to 12 Years A Slave. It was laughable.

RT means nothing. And there's nothing wrong wih giving 12 SLAVES Best Picture, it was an excellent movie. All you're doing is revealing *your* biases.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.