Jump to content

BadAtGender

Monday 6 Nov. Numbers: Thor $8.25m (pg6)

Recommended Posts



But who's saying it won't be frontloaded though? Would a 2.6x multi still not be frontloaded for a film with glowing critical and early audience score reception? If it didn't have typical MCU sequel frontloading, I'd be discussing higher than 2.7x, that's for sure. Also OW size definitely plays a factor in frontloading. Hard to compare a 122m OW with a 179m one. Who's to say CW wouldn't have hit 2.5x+ with TR's OW? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MovieMan89 said:

But who's saying it won't be frontloaded though? Would a 2.6x multi still not be frontloaded for a film with glowing critical and early audience score reception? If it didn't have typical MCU sequel frontloading, I'd be discussing higher than 2.7x, that's for sure. Also OW size definitely plays a factor in frontloading. Hard to compare a 122m OW with a 179m one. Who's to say CW wouldn't have hit 2.5x+ with TR's OW? 

Me. CW with the OW no matter how good was basically an Avengers movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Just now, YourMother said:

Me. CW with the OW no matter how good was basically an Avengers movie.

Then why do the vast majority of OWs over 140m+ have such poor or mediocre multis? Get down to the 135m mark or so and multis start looking much healthier on average. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, The Last baumer said:

Chances are I'm going to miss some movies, but since 2008, here are all the sequels released in November (excluding animation) and their multipliers:

 

2008:

 

Quantum of Solace:  2.5

Transporter 3:  2.58

 

2009:

 

Twilight New Moon:  2.08

 

2010:

 

Deathly Hallows 1:  2.37

 

2011:

 

Breaking Dawn 1:  2.03

Harold and Kumar 3:  2.69

 

2012:

 

BD2:  2.07

 

2013:

 

Hunger Games CF:  2.68

Thor 2:  2.42

Best Man Holiday:  2.33

 

2014:

 

Mockingjay 1:  2.76

Dumb and Dumber To:  2.38

 

2015:

 

Mockingjay 2:  2.75

Spectre:  2.85

 

2016:  

 

None

 

So with the exception of the Hunger Games films, and one Bond film, not a lot of sequels have hit 2.6X.  Again, not saying it can't but releasing a sequel in November means statistically speaking, it's harder to hit a 2.6X, unless you are Katniss.  5 out of the 14 films exceeded 2.6 and three of those were Katniss.

 

 

 

Most of those were either critical duds or young adult.

 

Twilight, for example, is typically way more frontloaded than MCU, even the MCU sequels.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by grey ghost
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



10 minutes ago, MovieMan89 said:

Then why do the vast majority of OWs over 140m+ have such poor or mediocre multis? Get down to the 135m mark or so and multis start looking much healthier on average. 

Smaller fanbase and more accessible to the GA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, YourMother said:

Smaller fanbase and more accessible to the GA.

So then you're telling me the smaller fanbase and therefore opening of a Thor film vs that of an Iron Man/Captain America team up film shouldn't be expected to make a difference in frontloading? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



23 minutes ago, MovieMan89 said:

But who's saying it won't be frontloaded though? Would a 2.6x multi still not be frontloaded for a film with glowing critical and early audience score reception? If it didn't have typical MCU sequel frontloading, I'd be discussing higher than 2.7x, that's for sure. Also OW size definitely plays a factor in frontloading. Hard to compare a 122m OW with a 179m one. Who's to say CW wouldn't have hit 2.5x+ with TR's OW? 

 

2.6x seems about average for any sort of major tentpole these days (putting aside holiday runs). Legs are just shorter in general.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, grey ghost said:

Most of those were either critical duds or young adult.

 

Twilight, for example, is typically way more frontloaded than MCU, even the MCU sequels.

 

 

 

 

 

 

There's no passion or prejudice in my research.  It's hard numbers.  You can't dispute the numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



6 minutes ago, Squadron Leader Tele said:

 

2.6x seems about average for any sort of major tentpole these days (putting aside holiday runs). Legs are just shorter in general.

Yet Civil War and Logan are the only two big budget movies from the last few years I can think of with great critical acclaim and  sub 2.6x multis (and Logan just barely). Which are both CBM's, so I'm not saying it's impossible TR goes below that mark in spite of the critical reception. I just don't think it's inaccurate at all to say the odds are against it.   

Edited by MovieMan89
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MovieMan89 said:

Yet Civil War and Logan are the only two big budget movies from the last few years I can think of with great critical acclaim and  sub 2.6x multis. Which are both CBM's, so I'm not saying it's impossible TR goes below that mark in spite of the critical reception. I just don't think it's inaccurate at all to say the odds are against it.   

 

May the odds ever be in your favour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



7 minutes ago, The Last baumer said:

 

There's no passion or prejudice in my research.  It's hard numbers.  You can't dispute the numbers.

You can't dispute them, but you can put them into context. And context matters. A lot. Numbers can be quite meaningless without it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



19 minutes ago, The Last baumer said:

 

There's no passion or prejudice in my research.  It's hard numbers.  You can't dispute the numbers.

Speaking of numbers:

 

Civil War is the only MCU movie with an RT score above 80% to have legs shorter than 2.6.

 

That's what you call an anomaly, my friend.

 

And not one laugh out loud MCU film has had legs under 2.6.

 

You're lucky I'm outta points in the casino or I'd clean house.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Because I have nothing better to do today:

List of all Friday opening big budget movie multis that got RT scores over 80% from 2015-present

 

 

2015:

The Revenant - 4.57x

The Martian - 4.22x

Inside Out - 3.95x

The Force Awakens - 3.78x

Mission Impossible Rogue Nation - 3.55x

Max Max: Fury Road - 3.4x

Ant-Man - 3.15x

Cinderella - 3x

 

2016:

Zootopia - 4.55x

Finding Dory - 3.6x

Jungle Book - 3.54x

Kung Fu Panda 3 - 3.49x

Rogue One - 3.43x

Deadpool - 2.75x

Doctor Strange - 2.72x

Star Trek Beyond - 2.68x

Civil War - 2.28x

 

2017: 

Wonder Woman - 4x

Dunkirk - 3.76x

Spiderman Homecoming - 2.85x

Guardians of the Galaxy 2 - 2.66x

War for the Planet of the Apes - 2.63x

Logan - 2.58x

Thor: Ragnarok: ???

 

Once again, CW remains the major outlier in these stats. 

Edited by MovieMan89
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Just now, MovieMan89 said:

Because I have nothing better to do today:

List of all Friday opening big budget movie multis that got RT scores over 80% from 2015-present

 

 

2015:

The Revenant - 4.57x

Inside Out - 3.95x

The Force Awakens - 3.78x

Mission Impossible Rogue Nation - 3.55x

Max Max: Fury Road - 3.4x

Ant-Man - 3.15x

Cinderella - 3x

 

2016:

Zootopia - 4.55x

Finding Dory - 3.6x

Jungle Book - 3.54x

Kung Fu Panda 3 - 3.49x

Rogue One - 3.43x

Deadpool - 2.75x

Doctor Strange - 2.72x

Star Trek Beyond - 2.68x

Civil War - 2.28x

 

2017: 

Wonder Woman - 4x

Dunkirk - 3.76x

Spiderman Homecoming - 2.85x

Guardians of the Galaxy 2 - 2.66x

War for the Planet of the Apes - 2.63xLogan - 2.58x

Thor: Ragnarok: ???

 

Once again, CW remains the major outlier in these stats. 

You forgot The Martian in 2015.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites





11 hours ago, RagnaRoc said:

Whatever Ragnarok is at on about Wednesday or Thursday is probably going to be half its DOM gross. Most MCU films hit the halfway mark between days 5 and 8.

Uh...That's factually not true. For example, Homecoming was at $163m on its first Thursday, and Vol. 2 was at $183m on its first Thursday. Both went past the double of that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



3 hours ago, ZattMurdock said:

Uh...That's factually not true. For example, Homecoming was at $163m on its first Thursday, and Vol. 2 was at $183m on its first Thursday. Both went past the double of that. 

 

I think that's why he said MOST.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites







  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.