Coco | Pixar / Lee Unkrich | Now playing | #1 all-time in Mexico

[YM!]

Assuming that's without the Frozen short and assuming an intermission. Coco's total runtime should be about a 2 hours and 20 minutes without trailers.

[ThomasNicole]

If this movie it's good like it seems, i doubt this will gross less than $ 200m

[cannastop]

9 minutes ago, YourMother said:

Assuming that's without the Frozen short and assuming an intermission. Coco's total runtime should be about a 2 hours and 20 minutes without trailers.

That's a long ass runtime for a family movie.

[Ethan Hunt]

14 minutes ago, YourMother said:

Assuming that's without the Frozen short and assuming an intermission. Coco's total runtime should be about a 2 hours and 20 minutes without trailers.

LMAO 

 

R.I.P this movie. under 100M domestic incoming 

[That One Girl]

33 minutes ago, YourMother said:

Assuming that's without the Frozen short and assuming an intermission. Coco's total runtime should be about a 2 hours and 20 minutes without trailers.

 

Why would there be an intermission for this movie?

[YM!]

2 minutes ago, That One Guy said:

 

Why would there be an intermission for this movie?

It's a 20 minute short after 15 minutes of previews, I'd imagine there'd be some sort of break.

[WrathOfHan]

1 minute ago, YourMother said:

It's a 20 minute short after 15 minutes of previews, I'd imagine there'd be some sort of break.

Why? Just treat it like a 2 hour movie. It's not that hard.

[Ethan Hunt]

this movie is fucked 

[YM!]

5 minutes ago, WrathOfHan said:

Why? Just treat it like a 2 hour movie. It's not that hard.

I would think that it'd be a break to go to the lobby or take a bathroom trip for families. They did it the last time Disney had a 22 minute short in front of a movie. Then again that was the 90's. I might be overthinking it.

Edited October 12, 2017 by YourMother

[Ezen Baklattan]

That's about as long as BATB was. A bit stretchy for an animated film, but not uneasonable, I'd say.

[Eric Loves Rey]

3 minutes ago, WrathOfHan said:

Why? Just treat it like a 2 hour movie. It's not that hard.

I kinda get where he's coming from. In 1990, Rescuers Down Under had a 30-minute short film attached to it, and there was an intermission between both the short and the movie. Keep in mind I don't think there will be an intermission. Rescuers was 77 minutes long, while Frozen will be 10 minutes shorter than the Mickey short, and I think such a practice was probably at fault for why Rescuers underperformed at the box office.

 

[Jonwo]

37 minutes ago, WrathOfHan said:

Why? Just treat it like a 2 hour movie. It's not that hard.

It's not even that long for a Pixar film, Cars and The Incredibles were 116 minutes and 115 minutes plus a 7 minute short so Coco with the Frozen short which is 21 minutes long is only 2-3 minutes longer than those two which is nothing. 

36 minutes ago, Ethan Hunt said:

this movie is fucked 

God Dammit Ethan! The adults are talking! 

[cookie]

33 minutes ago, CoolEric258 said:

and I think such a practice was probably at fault for why Rescuers underperformed at the box office.

 

No, it's because Katzenberg pulled all advertising giving Rescuers Down Under absolutely no chance to recover. The idea that the short had something to do with it is absurd.

[Fancyarcher]

40 minutes ago, Ethan Hunt said:

this movie is fucked 

You seem awfully convinced Coco's going to flop based seemingly sorely off the fact that it has an intermission. Oh Ethan!

Just now, Jonwo said:

It's not even that long for a Pixar film, Cars and The Incredibles were 116 minutes and 115 minutes plus a 7 minute short so Coco with the Frozen short which is 21 minutes long is only 2-3 minutes longer than those two which is nothing. 

God Dammit Ethan! The adults are talking! 

Yeah, it's actually pretty average for an animated film these days too. Technology keeps advancing and advancing, and it's allowed animators to make animated films that are much longer in length then a classic Disney animated film which tended to be 70 to 80 minutes in length. Lets not forget that 1 hour and 44 minutes also includes the credits. 

[Ethan Hunt]

Just now, Fancyarcher said:

You seem awfully convinced Coco's going to flop based seemingly sorely off the fact that it has an intermission. Oh Ethan!

 

Tis only part of it. I would probably still be predicting it to be Pixar'so lowest grossing movie either way

[YM!]

The intermission thing isn't confirmed but it's a guess due to the past and one of my theories.

Edited October 13, 2017 by YourMother

[cannastop]

4 minutes ago, Ethan Hunt said:

Tis only part of it. I would probably still be predicting it to be Pixar'so lowest grossing movie either way

Why, though?

[Jonwo]

1 minute ago, Fancyarcher said:

Yeah, it's actually pretty average for an animated film these days too. Technology keeps advancing and advancing, and it's allowed animators to make animated films that are much longer in length then a classic Disney animated film which tended to be 70 to 80 minutes in length. Lets not forget that 1 hour and 44 minutes also includes the credits. 

I doubt any of the big studio will attempt a 2 hour plus animated film, it's more common in anime. 

[YM!]

1 minute ago, Jonwo said:

I doubt any of the big studio will attempt a 2 hour plus animated film, it's more common in anime. 

Incredibles 2 is around the corner.

[Fancyarcher]

5 minutes ago, Ethan Hunt said:

Tis only part of it. I would probably still be predicting it to be Pixar'so lowest grossing movie either way

I can only imagine it doing less then The Good Dinosaurs if reviews are in the 70% or 60% percentage. Also we have no screening reactions yet.

Just now, Jonwo said:

I doubt any of the big studio will attempt a 2 hour plus animated film, it's more common in anime. 

If any western animated films has the possible potential to go over 2 hours in length, I think it's The Incredibles 2.