Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets | July 21, 2017 | FLOP OF THE YEAR

[kowhite]

On 9/19/2017 at 2:27 PM, CJohn said:

You have to be joking, right?

 

Are you trying to say Transporter movies didn't make money?  Wat?

[Barnack]

On ‎9‎/‎19‎/‎2017 at 5:27 PM, CJohn said:

You have to be joking, right?

Do you think they are making all those sequels to non profitable movies ?

 

The Jason Statham  movie business is more of a home video one (they are somewhat close to direct to video movie in some ways):

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2016/08/23/why-is-there-a-mechanic-sequel-jason-statham/89110234/

[Arlborn]

Fun universe to explore in this movie, shame we'll never get a sequel.

 

But just like with King Arthur I'm just glad we at least got this one.

 

 

[Valonqar]

2 minutes ago, Arlborn said:

Fun universe to explore in this movie, shame we'll never get a sequel.

 

But just like with King Arthur I'm just glad we at least got this one.

 

 

They can always make lower-budgeted sequels to both with The Rock and turn them into solid hits. 

[Napoleon]

3 hours ago, Arlborn said:

Fun universe to explore in this movie, shame we'll never get a sequel.

 

Never say never, look what happened to Blade Runner.

[grim22]

@That One Guy

 

 

[That One Girl]

16 minutes ago, grim22 said:

@That One Guy

 

 

 

Cool.  Still a great movie.

[TalismanRing]

The first comment is of course about casting better leads.  The 2nd comment though 

 

 

 

[Mr Impossible]

It’s better than Last Jedi.